Tiwari Amit, Lemke Johannes, Altmueller Janine, Thiele Holger, Glaus Esther, Fleischhauer Johannes, Nürnberg Peter, Neidhardt John, Berger Wolfgang
Institute of Medical Molecular Genetics, University of Zurich, Wagistrasse 12, CH-8952, Schlieren, Switzerland.
Cologne Center for Genomics (CCG), University of Cologne, Weyertal 115b, D-50931, Cologne, Germany.
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158692. eCollection 2016.
Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) are Mendelian diseases with tremendous genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity. Identification of the underlying genetic basis of these dystrophies is therefore challenging. In this study we employed whole exome sequencing (WES) in 11 families with IRDs and identified disease-causing variants in 8 of them. Sequence analysis of about 250 IRD-associated genes revealed 3 previously reported disease-associated variants in RHO, BEST1 and RP1. We further identified 5 novel pathogenic variants in RPGRIP1 (p.Ser964Profs37), PRPF8 (p.Tyr2334Leufs51), CDHR1 (p.Pro133Arg and c.439-17G>A) and PRPF31 (p.Glu183_Met193dup). In addition to confirming the power of WES in genetic diagnosis of IRDs, we document challenges in data analysis and show cases where the underlying genetic causes of IRDs were missed by WES and required additional techniques. For example, the mutation c.439-17G>A in CDHR1 would be rated unlikely applying the standard WES analysis. Only transcript analysis in patient fibroblasts confirmed the pathogenic nature of this variant that affected splicing of CDHR1 by activating a cryptic splice-acceptor site. In another example, a 33-base pair duplication in PRPF31 missed by WES could be identified only via targeted analysis by Sanger sequencing. We discuss the advantages and challenges of using WES to identify mutations in heterogeneous diseases like IRDs.
遗传性视网膜营养不良(IRDs)是具有巨大遗传和表型异质性的孟德尔疾病。因此,确定这些营养不良的潜在遗传基础具有挑战性。在本研究中,我们对11个患有IRDs的家庭进行了全外显子组测序(WES),并在其中8个家庭中鉴定出致病变体。对约250个与IRD相关的基因进行序列分析,发现RHO、BEST1和RP1中有3个先前报道的疾病相关变体。我们进一步在RPGRIP1(p.Ser964Profs37)、PRPF8(p.Tyr2334Leufs51)、CDHR1(p.Pro133Arg和c.439-17G>A)和PRPF31(p.Glu183_Met193dup)中鉴定出5个新的致病变体。除了证实WES在IRD基因诊断中的作用外,我们还记录了数据分析中的挑战,并展示了一些病例,其中WES遗漏了IRD的潜在遗传原因,需要额外的技术。例如,应用标准WES分析,CDHR1中的突变c.439-17G>A可能被判定为不太可能。只有对患者成纤维细胞进行转录分析,才能证实该变体的致病性质,该变体通过激活一个隐蔽的剪接受体位点影响CDHR1的剪接。在另一个例子中,WES遗漏的PRPF31中的一个33碱基对重复,只能通过桑格测序的靶向分析来鉴定。我们讨论了使用WES来鉴定像IRDs这样的异质性疾病中的突变的优点和挑战。