• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口吃者与非口吃者喉前运动时间、调整时间及反应时间的对比研究。

A comparative investigation of the laryngeal premotor, adjustment, and reaction times of stutterers and nonstutterers.

作者信息

Bakker K, Brutten G J

机构信息

Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1989 Jun;32(2):239-44. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3202.239.

DOI:10.1044/jshr.3202.239
PMID:2739375
Abstract

The laryngeal premotor, adjustment, and reaction times of 24 stutterers and 24 nonstutterers were assessed by means of a group (2) by stimulus modality (3) by stimulus order (6) factorial investigation. The laryngeal measures were determined from print outs made from electroglottographic recordings taken during the production of [a] that was cued by a visual, auditory, or somato-sensory stimulus. The results revealed that the laryngeal reaction times of stutterers were significantly longer than those of the nonstutterers. Moreover, the reaction times were significantly longer both during the laryngeal premotor and adjustment time periods. The observed between-group difference for each of these laryngeal measures was independent of the stimulus that was employed.

摘要

通过一项2(组)×3(刺激方式)×6(刺激顺序)的析因研究,对24名口吃者和24名非口吃者的喉前运动时间、调整时间和反应时间进行了评估。喉部测量数据是根据在视觉、听觉或躯体感觉刺激提示下发出[a]音时所记录的电声门图打印件确定的。结果显示,口吃者的喉部反应时间明显长于非口吃者。此外,在喉前运动和调整时间段内,反应时间也明显更长。在这些喉部测量指标中观察到的组间差异与所采用的刺激无关。

相似文献

1
A comparative investigation of the laryngeal premotor, adjustment, and reaction times of stutterers and nonstutterers.口吃者与非口吃者喉前运动时间、调整时间及反应时间的对比研究。
J Speech Hear Res. 1989 Jun;32(2):239-44. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3202.239.
2
Preparation time and response complexity effects on stutterers' and nonstutterers' acoustic LRT.
J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Feb;34(1):49-59. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3401.49.
3
Speech-related reaction times of stutterers and nonstutterers: diagnostic implications.
J Speech Hear Disord. 1990 May;55(2):295-9. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5502.295.
4
Acoustic and physiological reaction times of stutterers and nonstutterers.口吃者与非口吃者的听觉及生理反应时间。
J Speech Hear Res. 1989 Sep;32(3):668-80. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3203.668.
5
Subvocalization and reading rate differences between stuttering and nonstuttering children and adults.口吃儿童和成人与非口吃儿童和成人之间的默读和阅读速度差异。
J Speech Hear Res. 1990 Dec;33(4):776-85. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3304.776.
6
Physiological bases of acoustic LRT in nonstutterers, mild stutterers, and severe stutterers.非口吃者、轻度口吃者和重度口吃者声学性言语流畅性的生理基础。
J Speech Hear Res. 1987 Dec;30(4):434-47. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3004.434.
7
Laryngeal and manual reaction times of stuttering and nonstuttering adults.
J Speech Hear Res. 1981 Jun;24(2):192-6. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2402.192.
8
Shadowed and simple reaction times in stutterers and nonstutterers.口吃者和非口吃者的隐蔽反应时间与简单反应时间
J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Oct;86(4):1277-84. doi: 10.1121/1.398742.
9
Temporal-phonemic processing skills in adult stutterers and nonstutterers.成年口吃者和非口吃者的颞部音素加工技能。
J Speech Hear Res. 1989 Jun;32(2):274-80. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3202.274.
10
Laryngeal behavior during stuttering: a further study.
J Speech Hear Res. 1985 Jun;28(2):233-40. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2802.233.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of volitional opposing and following responses across speakers with different vocal histories.比较不同嗓音史的说话者的自主对抗和跟随反应。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Dec;146(6):4244. doi: 10.1121/1.5134769.
2
Semantic and Phonological Encoding Times in Adults Who Stutter: Brain Electrophysiological Evidence.口吃成年人的语义和语音编码时间:脑电生理证据。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Oct 17;60(10):2906-2923. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0309.
3
Understanding the mechanisms underlying voluntary responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback.
理解对音高变化的听觉反馈的自主反应背后的机制。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 May;135(5):3036-44. doi: 10.1121/1.4870490.