Suppr超能文献

口吃成年人的语义和语音编码时间:脑电生理证据。

Semantic and Phonological Encoding Times in Adults Who Stutter: Brain Electrophysiological Evidence.

作者信息

Maxfield Nathan D

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Oct 17;60(10):2906-2923. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0309.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Some psycholinguistic theories of stuttering propose that language production operates along a different time course in adults who stutter (AWS) versus typically fluent adults (TFA). However, behavioral evidence for such a difference has been mixed. Here, the time course of semantic and phonological encoding in picture naming was compared in AWS (n = 16) versus TFA (n = 16) by measuring 2 event-related potential (ERP) components: NoGo N200, an ERP index of response inhibition, and lateralized readiness potential, an ERP index of response preparation.

METHOD

Each trial required a semantic judgment about a picture in addition to a phonemic judgment about the target label of the picture. Judgments were mapped onto a dual-choice (Go-NoGo/left-right) push-button response paradigm. On each trial, ERP activity time-locked to picture onset was recorded at 32 scalp electrodes.

RESULTS

NoGo N200 was detected earlier to semantic NoGo trials than to phonemic NoGo trials in both groups, replicating previous evidence that semantic encoding generally precedes phonological encoding in language production. Moreover, N200 onset was earlier to semantic NoGo trials in TFA than in AWS, indicating that semantic information triggering response inhibition became available earlier in TFA versus AWS. In contrast, the time course of N200 activity to phonemic NoGo trials did not differ between groups. Lateralized readiness potential activity was influenced by strategic response preparation and, thus, could not be used to index real-time semantic and phonological encoding.

CONCLUSION

NoGo N200 results point to slowed semantic encoding in AWS versus TFA. Discussion considers possible factors in slowed semantic encoding in AWS and how fluency might be impacted by slowed semantic encoding.

摘要

目的

一些关于口吃的心理语言学理论认为,与典型流利的成年人(TFA)相比,口吃成年人(AWS)的语言生成过程在时间进程上有所不同。然而,关于这种差异的行为证据并不一致。在此,通过测量两个事件相关电位(ERP)成分:NoGo N200(一种反应抑制的ERP指标)和偏侧化准备电位(一种反应准备的ERP指标),比较了AWS组(n = 16)和TFA组(n = 16)在图片命名中语义和语音编码的时间进程。

方法

每个试验除了需要对图片的目标标签进行音素判断外,还需要对图片进行语义判断。判断被映射到一个双选(Go-NoGo/左右)按钮反应范式上。在每个试验中,在32个头皮电极上记录与图片开始时间锁定的ERP活动。

结果

在两组中,语义NoGo试验比音素NoGo试验更早检测到NoGo N200,这重复了先前的证据,即语言生成中语义编码通常先于语音编码。此外,TFA组中语义NoGo试验的N200起始时间比AWS组更早,表明触发反应抑制的语义信息在TFA组比AWS组中更早可用。相比之下,两组之间音素NoGo试验的N200活动时间进程没有差异。偏侧化准备电位活动受策略性反应准备的影响,因此不能用于索引实时语义和语音编码。

结论

NoGo N200结果表明AWS组与TFA组相比语义编码减慢。讨论考虑了AWS组语义编码减慢的可能因素以及语义编码减慢可能如何影响流畅性。

相似文献

1
Semantic and Phonological Encoding Times in Adults Who Stutter: Brain Electrophysiological Evidence.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Oct 17;60(10):2906-2923. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0309.
2
Exploring semantic and phonological picture-word priming in adults who stutter using event-related potentials.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Jun;123(6):1131-46. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
4
Inhibitory Control of Lexical Selection in Adults who Stutter.
J Fluency Disord. 2020 Dec;66:105780. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105780. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
5
Semantic and Phonological Encoding in Adults Who Stutter: Silent Responses to Pictorial Stimuli.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Sep 18;60(9):2537-2550. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0323.
6
Neural correlates of semantic activation spreading on the path to picture naming in adults who stutter.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Sep;121(9):1447-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.03.026. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
7
Abnormal processing of prosodic boundary in adults who stutter: An ERP study.
Brain Cogn. 2018 Dec;128:17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
8
Involvement of the Central Cognitive Mechanism in Word Production in Adults Who Stutter.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 Dec 1;59(6):1269-1282. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-14-0224.
9
An event-related potential investigation of sentence processing in adults who stutter.
Neurosci Res. 2016 May;106:29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
10
Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Jul;23(4):787-806. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.23.4.787.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the activation of target words in adults who stutter with and without conscious intention to speak: ERP evidence.
J Commun Disord. 2025 Jan-Feb;113:106486. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106486. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
2
Exploring the Activation of Target Words in Picture Naming in Children Who Stutter: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Sep 12;67(9):2903-2919. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00570. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
3
Adults Who Stutter Show Diminished Word Fluency, Regardless of Mode.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Mar 8;65(3):906-922. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00344. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
4
Cognitive control of action naming in adults who stutter.
J Fluency Disord. 2021 Dec;70:105841. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2021.105841. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
5
Inhibitory Control of Lexical Selection in Adults who Stutter.
J Fluency Disord. 2020 Dec;66:105780. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105780. Epub 2020 Sep 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Attention demands of language production in adults who stutter.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Apr;127(4):1942-60. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
2
A preliminary investigation of daily variability of stuttering in adults.
J Commun Disord. 2016 Mar-Apr;60:39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
3
An event-related potential investigation of sentence processing in adults who stutter.
Neurosci Res. 2016 May;106:29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
4
Bridging computational approaches to speech production: The semantic-lexical-auditory-motor model (SLAM).
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Apr;23(2):339-52. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0903-7.
5
Modulation of auditory processing during speech movement planning is limited in adults who stutter.
Brain Lang. 2015 Apr;143:59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
6
Real-time processing in picture naming in adults who stutter: ERP evidence.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Feb;126(2):284-96. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 May 20.
7
Language production: Methods and methodologies.
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Dec;3(4):395-421. doi: 10.3758/BF03214545.
8
Conscious intention to speak proactively facilitates lexical access during overt object naming.
J Mem Lang. 2012 Nov 1;65(4):345-362. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.06.002.
9
Epidemiology of stuttering: 21st century advances.
J Fluency Disord. 2013 Jun;38(2):66-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.11.002. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
10
A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies.
J Mem Lang. 2004 Aug;51(2):247-250. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.002.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验