Maxfield Nathan D
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Oct 17;60(10):2906-2923. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0309.
Some psycholinguistic theories of stuttering propose that language production operates along a different time course in adults who stutter (AWS) versus typically fluent adults (TFA). However, behavioral evidence for such a difference has been mixed. Here, the time course of semantic and phonological encoding in picture naming was compared in AWS (n = 16) versus TFA (n = 16) by measuring 2 event-related potential (ERP) components: NoGo N200, an ERP index of response inhibition, and lateralized readiness potential, an ERP index of response preparation.
Each trial required a semantic judgment about a picture in addition to a phonemic judgment about the target label of the picture. Judgments were mapped onto a dual-choice (Go-NoGo/left-right) push-button response paradigm. On each trial, ERP activity time-locked to picture onset was recorded at 32 scalp electrodes.
NoGo N200 was detected earlier to semantic NoGo trials than to phonemic NoGo trials in both groups, replicating previous evidence that semantic encoding generally precedes phonological encoding in language production. Moreover, N200 onset was earlier to semantic NoGo trials in TFA than in AWS, indicating that semantic information triggering response inhibition became available earlier in TFA versus AWS. In contrast, the time course of N200 activity to phonemic NoGo trials did not differ between groups. Lateralized readiness potential activity was influenced by strategic response preparation and, thus, could not be used to index real-time semantic and phonological encoding.
NoGo N200 results point to slowed semantic encoding in AWS versus TFA. Discussion considers possible factors in slowed semantic encoding in AWS and how fluency might be impacted by slowed semantic encoding.
一些关于口吃的心理语言学理论认为,与典型流利的成年人(TFA)相比,口吃成年人(AWS)的语言生成过程在时间进程上有所不同。然而,关于这种差异的行为证据并不一致。在此,通过测量两个事件相关电位(ERP)成分:NoGo N200(一种反应抑制的ERP指标)和偏侧化准备电位(一种反应准备的ERP指标),比较了AWS组(n = 16)和TFA组(n = 16)在图片命名中语义和语音编码的时间进程。
每个试验除了需要对图片的目标标签进行音素判断外,还需要对图片进行语义判断。判断被映射到一个双选(Go-NoGo/左右)按钮反应范式上。在每个试验中,在32个头皮电极上记录与图片开始时间锁定的ERP活动。
在两组中,语义NoGo试验比音素NoGo试验更早检测到NoGo N200,这重复了先前的证据,即语言生成中语义编码通常先于语音编码。此外,TFA组中语义NoGo试验的N200起始时间比AWS组更早,表明触发反应抑制的语义信息在TFA组比AWS组中更早可用。相比之下,两组之间音素NoGo试验的N200活动时间进程没有差异。偏侧化准备电位活动受策略性反应准备的影响,因此不能用于索引实时语义和语音编码。
NoGo N200结果表明AWS组与TFA组相比语义编码减慢。讨论考虑了AWS组语义编码减慢的可能因素以及语义编码减慢可能如何影响流畅性。