Yang Lin, Xia Liangping, Wang Yan, Hong Shaodong, Chen Haiyang, Liang Shaobo, Peng Peijian, Chen Yong
Sun Yat-sen University cancer center, Guangzhou, China.
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China.
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 11;11(7):e0158853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158853. eCollection 2016.
Poor nutritional status is associated with progression and advanced disease in patients with cancer. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) may represent a simple method of assessing host immunonutritional status. This study was designed to investigate the prognostic value of the PNI for distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
A training cohort of 1,168 patients with non-metastatic NPC from two institutions was retrospectively analyzed. The optimal PNI cutoff value for DMFS was identified using the online tool "Cutoff Finder". DMFS was analyzed using stratified and adjusted analysis. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed to balance baseline characteristics between the high and low PNI groups. Subsequently, the prognostic value of the PNI for DMFS was validated in an external validation cohort of 756 patients with NPC. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) was calculated to compare the discriminatory ability of different prognostic scores.
The optimal PNI cutoff value was determined to be 51. Low PNI was significantly associated with poorer DMFS than high PNI in univariate analysis (P<0.001) as well as multivariate analysis (P<0.001) before propensity score matching. In subgroup analyses, PNI could also stratify different risks of distant metastases. Propensity score-matched analyses confirmed the prognostic value of PNI, excluding other interpretations and selection bias. In the external validation cohort, patients with high PNI also had significantly lower risk of distant metastases than those with low PNI (Hazards Ratios, 0.487; P<0.001). The PNI consistently showed a higher AUC value at 1-year (0.780), 3-year (0.793) and 5-year (0.812) in comparison with other prognostic scores.
PNI, an inexpensive and easily assessable inflammatory index, could aid clinicians in developing individualized treatment and follow-up strategies for patients with non-metastatic NPC.
营养状况不佳与癌症患者的病情进展和疾病晚期相关。预后营养指数(PNI)可能是评估宿主免疫营养状况的一种简单方法。本研究旨在探讨PNI对鼻咽癌(NPC)患者无远处转移生存期(DMFS)的预后价值。
回顾性分析来自两个机构的1168例非转移性NPC患者的训练队列。使用在线工具“Cutoff Finder”确定DMFS的最佳PNI临界值。采用分层和校正分析对DMFS进行分析。进行倾向评分匹配分析以平衡高PNI组和低PNI组之间的基线特征。随后,在756例NPC患者的外部验证队列中验证PNI对DMFS的预后价值。计算受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积以比较不同预后评分的鉴别能力。
确定最佳PNI临界值为51。在倾向评分匹配前的单因素分析(P<0.001)以及多因素分析(P<0.001)中,低PNI与比高PNI更差的DMFS显著相关。在亚组分析中,PNI也可以对远处转移的不同风险进行分层。倾向评分匹配分析证实了PNI的预后价值,排除了其他解释和选择偏倚。在外部验证队列中,高PNI患者的远处转移风险也显著低于低PNI患者(风险比,0.487;P<0.001)。与其他预后评分相比,PNI在1年(0.780)、3年(0.793)和5年(0.812)时始终显示出更高的AUC值。
PNI是一种廉价且易于评估的炎症指标,可帮助临床医生为非转移性NPC患者制定个体化的治疗和随访策略。