Huang Jiegang, Jiang Junjun, Yang Xiaobo, Liang Bingyu, Qin Bo, Upur Halmurat, Zhong Chaohui, Wang Qianqiu, Wang Qian, Ruan Yuhua, Deng Wei, Xie Peiyan, Liao Yanyan, Xu Na, Zou Yunfeng, Wei Fumei, Ye Li, Liang Hao
1 Guangxi Key Laboratory of AIDS Prevention and Treatment & School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University , Nanning, Guangxi, China .
2 The First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University , Chongqing, China .
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2016 Oct/Nov;32(10-11):972-980. doi: 10.1089/AID.2016.0019. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
World Health Organization (WHO) and Joint United Nations Program on AIDS (UNAIDS) recommend male circumcision (MC) as an additional HIV prevention measure. This study aimed to assess three models of promoting MC and their effects on preventing HIV infection among drug users in western China. We carried out a cohort study in three provinces of western China. HIV seronegative male drug users were recruited from methadone maintenance therapy clinics and cluster randomized into three intervention models. At baseline, 6, and 9 months of follow-up, changes in MC knowledge, the acceptability of MC, MC surgery uptake, and the costs of model implementation were analyzed. Of 1,304 male drug users who were screened, 1,218 were enrolled in the study. The participants' knowledge about MC was significantly increased after interventions by all three models. The one-stage model led to the highest increase in MC acceptability and the greatest increase in MC uptake. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that the one-stage model was also the most effective method to promote MC uptake, compared with the two-stage model [rate ratio (RR) = 0.602; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.420-0.862] and three-stage model (RR = 0.555; 95% CI, 0.382-0.807). The HIV incidence rate in the MC group was lower than that in the non-MC group (RR = 0.234; 95% CI, 0.056-0.974). Moreover, the one-stage model required the lowest cost per circumcision. The one-stage model is the most effective and the most cost-effective intervention to increase MC uptake among male drug users in western China and could decrease the HIV incidence rate, based on a short follow-up investigation.
世界卫生组织(WHO)和联合国艾滋病规划署(UNAIDS)建议将男性包皮环切术(MC)作为一项额外的艾滋病预防措施。本研究旨在评估三种推广男性包皮环切术的模式及其对中国西部吸毒者预防艾滋病病毒感染的效果。我们在中国西部三个省份开展了一项队列研究。从美沙酮维持治疗诊所招募HIV血清阴性的男性吸毒者,并将其整群随机分为三种干预模式。在基线、随访6个月和9个月时,分析男性包皮环切术知识的变化、对男性包皮环切术的接受度、男性包皮环切术手术接受情况以及模式实施成本。在1304名接受筛查的男性吸毒者中,有1218名被纳入研究。所有三种模式干预后,参与者对男性包皮环切术的知识均显著增加。单阶段模式导致男性包皮环切术接受度增加最多,男性包皮环切术手术接受情况增加也最大。多变量Cox回归分析表明,与两阶段模式[率比(RR)=0.602;95%置信区间(CI),0.420 - 0.862]和三阶段模式(RR = 0.555;95%CI,0.382 - 0.807)相比,单阶段模式也是促进男性包皮环切术手术接受情况的最有效方法。男性包皮环切术组的艾滋病病毒发病率低于未进行男性包皮环切术组(RR = 0.234;95%CI,0.056 - 0.974)。此外,单阶段模式每次包皮环切术所需成本最低。基于短期随访调查,单阶段模式是增加中国西部男性吸毒者男性包皮环切术接受情况的最有效且最具成本效益的干预措施,并且可以降低艾滋病病毒发病率。