Suppr超能文献

比较三种干预模式在中国西部促进农民工进行环切术以减少当地艾滋病毒的性传播。

Comparison of three intervention models for promoting circumcision among migrant workers in western China to reduce local sexual transmission of HIV.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China ; Guangxi Key Laboratory of AIDS Prevention and Treatment, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Sep 30;8(9):e76107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076107. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Three models for promoting male circumcision (MC) as a preventative intervention against HIV infection were compared among migrant worker populations in western China.

METHODS

A cohort study was performed after an initial cross-sectional survey among migrant workers in three provincial level districts with high HIV prevalence in western China. A total of 1,670 HIV seronegative male migrants were cluster-randomized into three intervention models, in which the dissemination of promotional materials and expert- and volunteer-led discussions are conducted in one, two, and three stage interventions. Changes in knowledge of MC, acceptability of MC, MC surgery uptake, and the costs of implementation were analyzed at 6-month and 9-month follow-up visits.

RESULTS

All three models significantly increased the participants' knowledge about MC. The three-stage model significantly increased the acceptability of MC among participants and led to greatest increase in MC uptake. At the end of follow-up, 9.2% (153/1,670) of participants underwent MC surgery; uptake among the one-, two-, and three-stage models were 4.9%, 9.3%, and 14.6%, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that three-stage model was the most effective method to scale up MC, with RR = 2.0 (95% CI, 1.3-3.1, P=0.002) compared to the on-site session model. The two-stage intervention model showed no significant difference with either the on-site session model (RR=1.5, 95% CI, 0.92-2.4, P=0.12) or three-stage model (P=0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

A three-stage intervention with gradual introduction of knowledge led to the significantly increase in MC uptake among migrant workers in western China, and was also the most cost-effective method among the three models.

摘要

目的

在中国西部,对三种促进男性割礼(MC)作为预防艾滋病毒感染的干预措施模型在流动人口中进行了比较。

方法

在中国西部三个艾滋病高发省级地区,在流动人口中进行了一项横断面调查后,开展了一项队列研究。共有 1670 名 HIV 血清阴性的男性移民被整群随机分为三种干预模式,在这三种干预模式中,在一、二、三阶段干预中分别进行宣传材料的传播和专家及志愿者主导的讨论。在 6 个月和 9 个月的随访中,分析知识变化、MC 可接受性、MC 手术接受度和实施成本。

结果

所有三种模型均显著提高了参与者对 MC 的认识。三阶段模型显著提高了参与者对 MC 的接受度,并导致 MC 接受度的最大增加。在随访结束时,9.2%(153/1670)的参与者接受了 MC 手术;一、二、三阶段模型的接受率分别为 4.9%、9.3%和 14.6%。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,与现场会议模型相比,三阶段模型是扩大 MC 规模最有效的方法,RR=2.0(95%CI,1.3-3.1,P=0.002)。二阶段干预模型与现场会议模型(RR=1.5,95%CI,0.92-2.4,P=0.12)或三阶段模型(P=0.10)均无显著差异。

结论

在流动人口中,逐步引入知识的三阶段干预措施显著提高了 MC 的接受率,是三种模型中最具成本效益的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验