School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China ; Guangxi Key Laboratory of AIDS Prevention and Treatment, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 30;8(9):e76107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076107. eCollection 2013.
Three models for promoting male circumcision (MC) as a preventative intervention against HIV infection were compared among migrant worker populations in western China.
A cohort study was performed after an initial cross-sectional survey among migrant workers in three provincial level districts with high HIV prevalence in western China. A total of 1,670 HIV seronegative male migrants were cluster-randomized into three intervention models, in which the dissemination of promotional materials and expert- and volunteer-led discussions are conducted in one, two, and three stage interventions. Changes in knowledge of MC, acceptability of MC, MC surgery uptake, and the costs of implementation were analyzed at 6-month and 9-month follow-up visits.
All three models significantly increased the participants' knowledge about MC. The three-stage model significantly increased the acceptability of MC among participants and led to greatest increase in MC uptake. At the end of follow-up, 9.2% (153/1,670) of participants underwent MC surgery; uptake among the one-, two-, and three-stage models were 4.9%, 9.3%, and 14.6%, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that three-stage model was the most effective method to scale up MC, with RR = 2.0 (95% CI, 1.3-3.1, P=0.002) compared to the on-site session model. The two-stage intervention model showed no significant difference with either the on-site session model (RR=1.5, 95% CI, 0.92-2.4, P=0.12) or three-stage model (P=0.10).
A three-stage intervention with gradual introduction of knowledge led to the significantly increase in MC uptake among migrant workers in western China, and was also the most cost-effective method among the three models.
在中国西部,对三种促进男性割礼(MC)作为预防艾滋病毒感染的干预措施模型在流动人口中进行了比较。
在中国西部三个艾滋病高发省级地区,在流动人口中进行了一项横断面调查后,开展了一项队列研究。共有 1670 名 HIV 血清阴性的男性移民被整群随机分为三种干预模式,在这三种干预模式中,在一、二、三阶段干预中分别进行宣传材料的传播和专家及志愿者主导的讨论。在 6 个月和 9 个月的随访中,分析知识变化、MC 可接受性、MC 手术接受度和实施成本。
所有三种模型均显著提高了参与者对 MC 的认识。三阶段模型显著提高了参与者对 MC 的接受度,并导致 MC 接受度的最大增加。在随访结束时,9.2%(153/1670)的参与者接受了 MC 手术;一、二、三阶段模型的接受率分别为 4.9%、9.3%和 14.6%。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,与现场会议模型相比,三阶段模型是扩大 MC 规模最有效的方法,RR=2.0(95%CI,1.3-3.1,P=0.002)。二阶段干预模型与现场会议模型(RR=1.5,95%CI,0.92-2.4,P=0.12)或三阶段模型(P=0.10)均无显著差异。
在流动人口中,逐步引入知识的三阶段干预措施显著提高了 MC 的接受率,是三种模型中最具成本效益的方法。