Leppälahti Suvi, Heikinheimo Oskari, Kalliala Ilkka, Santalahti Päivi, Gissler Mika
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Helsinki and Kätilöopisto Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital, P.O. Box 610, 00029-HUS Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Helsinki and Kätilöopisto Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital, P.O. Box 610, 00029-HUS Helsinki, Finland
Hum Reprod. 2016 Sep;31(9):2142-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew178. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
Is underage abortion associated with adverse socioeconomic and health outcomes in early adulthood when compared with underage delivery?
Underage abortion was not found to be associated with mental health problems in early adulthood, and socioeconomic outcomes were better among those who experienced abortion compared with those who gave birth.
Teenage motherhood has been linked with numerous adverse outcomes in later life, including low educational levels and poor physical and mental health. Whether abortion at a young age predisposes to similar consequences is not clear.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This nationwide, retrospective cohort study from Finland, included all women born in 1987 (n = 29 041) and followed until 2012.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: We analysed socioeconomic, psychiatric and risk-taking-related health outcomes up to 25 years of age after underage (<18 years) abortion (n = 1041, 3.6%) and after childbirth (n = 394, 1.4%). Before and after conception analyses within the study groups were performed to further examine the association between abortion and adverse health outcomes. A group with no pregnancies up to 20 years of age (n = 25 312, 88.0%) served as an external reference group.
We found no significant differences between the underage abortion and the childbirth group regarding risks of psychiatric disorders (adjusted odds ratio 0.96 [0.67-1.40]) or suffering from intentional or unintentional poisoning by medications or drugs (1.06 [0.57-1.98]). Compared with those who gave birth, girls who underwent abortion were less likely to achieve only a low educational level (0.41 [95% confidence interval 0.31-0.54]) or to be welfare-dependent (0.31 [0.22-0.45]), but more likely to suffer from injuries (1.51 [1.09-2.10]). Compared with the external control group, both pregnancy groups were disadvantaged already prior to the pregnancy. Psychiatric disorders and risk-taking-related health outcomes, including injury, were increased in the abortion group and in the childbirth group similarly on both sides of the pregnancy.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The retrospective nature of the study remains a limitation. The identification of study subjects in order to collect additional data was not allowed for ethical reasons. Therefore further confounding factors, such as the intentionality of the pregnancy, could not be checked.
Previous studies have found that abortion is not harmful to mental health in the majority of adult women. Our study adds to the current understanding in suggesting that this is also the case concerning underage girls. Furthermore, women with a history of underage abortion had better socioeconomic outcomes compared with those who gave birth. These findings can be generalized to settings of high-quality social and health-care services, where abortion is accessible and affordable to all citizens. Social and health-care professionals who care for and counsel underage girls facing unplanned pregnancy should acknowledge this information.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was financially supported by the Finnish Cultural Foundation and the Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation. The researchers are independent of funders and the funders had no role in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report or in the decision to submit the article for publication. The authors have no competing interests.
与未成年生育相比,未成年人工流产在成年早期是否会带来不良的社会经济和健康后果?
未发现未成年人工流产与成年早期的心理健康问题相关,且与生育的人相比,经历过人工流产的人的社会经济状况更好。
少女怀孕与日后的众多不良后果有关,包括教育水平低以及身心健康状况差。年轻时人工流产是否会导致类似后果尚不清楚。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:这项来自芬兰的全国性回顾性队列研究纳入了所有1987年出生的女性(n = 29041),随访至2012年。
研究对象/材料、地点、方法:我们分析了未成年(<18岁)人工流产(n = 1041,3.6%)和分娩(n = 394,1.4%)后至25岁的社会经济、精神和与冒险行为相关的健康后果。在研究组内进行受孕前后分析,以进一步研究人工流产与不良健康后果之间的关联。一个20岁前未怀孕的组(n = 25312,88.0%)作为外部参照组。
我们发现,未成年人工流产组和分娩组在精神疾病风险(调整后的优势比为0.96 [0.67 - 1.40])或遭受药物或毒品有意或无意中毒方面(1.06 [0.57 - 1.98])没有显著差异。与分娩的女孩相比,接受人工流产的女孩获得低教育水平(0.41 [95%置信区间0.31 - 0.54])或依赖福利救济(0.31 [0.22 - 0.45])的可能性较小,但受伤的可能性更大(1.51 [1.09 - 2.10])。与外部对照组相比,两个怀孕组在怀孕前就处于不利地位。人工流产组和分娩组在怀孕前后,精神疾病和与冒险行为相关的健康后果(包括受伤)均同样增加。
局限性、谨慎原因:该研究的回顾性性质仍是一个局限。出于伦理原因,不允许为收集更多数据而识别研究对象。因此,无法检查其他混杂因素,如怀孕的意图。
先前的研究发现,人工流产对大多数成年女性的心理健康无害。我们的研究进一步表明,未成年女孩也是如此。此外,与生育的女性相比,有未成年人工流产史的女性的社会经济状况更好。这些发现可推广到高质量社会和医疗服务的环境中,在这种环境下,所有公民都能获得且负担得起人工流产服务。照顾和为面临意外怀孕的未成年女孩提供咨询的社会和医疗专业人员应了解这一信息。
研究资金/利益冲突:本研究得到芬兰文化基金会以及派维姬和萨卡里·索尔伯格基金会的资金支持。研究人员独立于资助者,资助者在研究设计、数据收集、分析和解释、报告撰写或提交文章发表的决策过程中没有任何作用。作者不存在利益冲突。