Rajkumar Ravi P
Psychiatry, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, IND.
Cureus. 2022 Nov 13;14(11):e31433. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31433. eCollection 2022 Nov.
Background It has often been suggested that restricting access to legal abortion could have a negative impact on the mental health of women seeking this procedure. The recent judgment of the United States Supreme Court in the Dobbs case has brought the question of the psychological impact of changes in abortion policy into focus. The results of studies on the link between induced abortion and mental health are contradictory, and interpreting the results of these studies is complex due to a multitude of potential confounding factors. However, there is little data on the relationship between the availability of legal abortion and its effects on the mental health of women of childbearing age in the general population. Objective The objective of the current study was to examine cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between access to legal abortion and the prevalence of common mental disorders in women of childbearing age at a cross-national level while correcting for potential confounding factors. Methods The current study employs both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of nation-level data for 197 countries and regions. As data on global abortion policy were compiled in 2009 and 2017 by the Guttmacher Institute, data on access to legal abortion for these years were examined in relation to the prevalence of anxiety disorders and depression in women of childbearing age for each country, obtained from the Global Burden of Disease Studies for the most recent subsequent year (2010 and 2019). The relationship between changes in abortion policy and changes in the prevalence of these disorders in each country was examined for the aforementioned period. All analyses were adjusted for the potential confounding effects of gender development, gender inequality, and intimate partner violence. Cross-sectional associations were examined using Pearson's bivariate and partial correlations, while longitudinal associations were examined using a general linear model and analyses of covariance. Results At the cross-sectional level, broad legal access to abortion was associated with a lower prevalence of depression in women aged 25-49 years, however, this association was not significant after correcting for measures of gender development, gender inequality, and intimate partner violence. At the longitudinal level, a slight but significant decrease in the prevalence of anxiety disorders in women aged 25-49 years was observed in countries where access to legal abortion was broadened in the period 2009-2017. This association remained marginally significant after adjustment for the above confounders. Conclusions The current study suggests that there is a modest relationship between access to legal abortion and its effects on the mental health of women aged 25-49 years. However, this relationship appears to be largely indirect in nature and influenced by factors, such as gender development, gender inequality, and intimate partner violence. These results may lead to further exploration of the links between reproductive rights and mental health of women in the general population and draw attention to the influence of gender inequality and intimate partner violence on mental health of women of childbearing age.
背景 人们常认为,限制合法堕胎的获取途径可能会对寻求堕胎手术的女性心理健康产生负面影响。美国最高法院最近在多布斯案中的判决使堕胎政策变化的心理影响问题成为焦点。关于人工流产与心理健康之间联系的研究结果相互矛盾,由于存在众多潜在的混杂因素,对这些研究结果的解读很复杂。然而,关于合法堕胎的可及性及其对一般人群中育龄妇女心理健康影响之间关系的数据却很少。
目的 本研究的目的是在跨国层面上,校正潜在混杂因素,研究合法堕胎的可及性与育龄妇女常见精神障碍患病率之间的横断面和纵向关联。
方法 本研究对197个国家和地区的国家层面数据进行了横断面和纵向分析。由于古特马赫研究所于2009年和2017年汇编了全球堕胎政策数据,因此研究了这些年份的合法堕胎可及性数据与每个国家育龄妇女焦虑症和抑郁症患病率之间的关系,这些患病率数据来自最近后续年份(2010年和2019年)的全球疾病负担研究。研究了上述时期每个国家堕胎政策变化与这些疾病患病率变化之间的关系。所有分析都对性别发展、性别不平等和亲密伴侣暴力的潜在混杂效应进行了校正。横断面关联采用Pearson双变量和偏相关进行检验,纵向关联采用一般线性模型和协方差分析进行检验。
结果 在横断面水平上,广泛的合法堕胎可及性与25至49岁女性较低的抑郁症患病率相关,然而,在校正性别发展、性别不平等和亲密伴侣暴力的测量指标后,这种关联并不显著。在纵向水平上,在2009 - 2017年期间合法堕胎可及性扩大的国家中,观察到25至49岁女性焦虑症患病率略有但显著下降。在对上述混杂因素进行调整后,这种关联仍略显显著。
结论 本研究表明,合法堕胎的可及性与其对25至49岁女性心理健康的影响之间存在适度的关系。然而,这种关系在很大程度上似乎是间接的,并且受到性别发展、性别不平等和亲密伴侣暴力等因素的影响。这些结果可能会促使人们进一步探索一般人群中妇女生殖权利与心理健康之间的联系,并引起人们对性别不平等和亲密伴侣暴力对育龄妇女心理健康影响的关注。