Nunes-da-Cunha Ines, Arguello Blanca, Martinez Fernando Martinez, Fernandez-Llimos Fernando
University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
University of Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Institute for Medicines Research, Lisbon, Portugal.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Jun 25;80(5):83. doi: 10.5688/ajpe80583.
Objective. To compare United States and European Higher Education Area (EHEA) undergraduate pharmacy curricula in terms of patient-centered care courses. Methods. Websites from all pharmacy colleges or schools in the United States and the 41 countries in the EHEA were retrieved from the FIP Official World List of Pharmacy Schools and investigated. A random sample of schools was selected and, based on analyses of course descriptions from syllabi, each course was classified into the following categories: social/behavioral/administrative pharmacy sciences, clinical sciences, experiential, or other/basic sciences. Results. Of 147 schools of pharmacy, 59 were included (23 in US and 36 in the EHEA). Differences existed in the percentages of credits/hours in all of the four subject area categories. Conclusion. Institutions in EHEA countries maintain a greater focus on basic sciences and a lower load of clinical sciences in pharmacy curricula compared to the United States. These differences may not be in accordance with international recommendations to educate future pharmacists focused on patient care.
目的。比较美国和欧洲高等教育区(EHEA)本科药学课程中以患者为中心的护理课程。方法。从国际药学联合会(FIP)官方药学学校世界名录中检索美国所有药学院校以及EHEA 41个国家的药学院校网站并进行调查。选取学校的随机样本,并根据教学大纲中的课程描述分析,将每门课程分为以下类别:社会/行为/行政药学科学、临床科学、实践课程或其他/基础科学。结果。在147所药学院校中,纳入了59所(美国23所,EHEA 36所)。四个学科领域类别的学分/学时百分比存在差异。结论。与美国相比,EHEA国家的院校在药学课程中更注重基础科学,临床科学的比重较低。这些差异可能不符合培养以患者护理为重点的未来药剂师的国际建议。