• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

照明和标识政策与降低农用设备相关碰撞率有关:对美国中西部九个州的政策分析

Lighting and marking policies are associated with reduced farm equipment-related crash rates: a policy analysis of nine Midwestern US states.

作者信息

Ramirez Marizen, Bedford Ronald, Wu Hongqian, Harland Karisa, Cavanaugh Joseph E, Peek-Asa Corinne

机构信息

Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, College of Public Health, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

出版信息

Occup Environ Med. 2016 Sep;73(9):621-6. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-103672. Epub 2016 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1136/oemed-2016-103672
PMID:27405602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5013097/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of roadway policies for lighting and marking of farm equipment in reducing crashes in Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wisconsin.

METHODS

In this ecological study, state policies on lighting and marking of farm equipment were scored for compliance with standards of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE). Using generalized estimating equations negative binomial models, we estimated the relationships between lighting and marking scores, and farm equipment crash rates, per 100 000 farm operations.

RESULTS

A total of 7083 crashes involving farm equipment was reported from 2005 to 2010 in the Upper Midwest and Great Plains. As the state lighting and marking score increased by 5 units, crash rates reduced by 17% (rate ratio=0.83; 95% CI 0.78 to 0.88). Lighting-only (rate ratio=0.48; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.51) and marking-only policies (rate ratio=0.89; 95% CI 0.83 to 0.96) were each associated with reduced crash rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Aligning lighting and marking policies with ASABE standards may effectively reduce crash rates involving farm equipment.

摘要

目的

评估伊利诺伊州、爱荷华州、堪萨斯州、明尼苏达州、密苏里州、内布拉斯加州、北达科他州、南达科他州和威斯康星州关于农用设备照明和标识的道路政策在减少事故方面的有效性。

方法

在这项生态学研究中,对各州关于农用设备照明和标识的政策进行评分,以确定其是否符合美国农业与生物工程师协会(ASABE)的标准。使用广义估计方程负二项式模型,我们估计了照明和标识评分与每10万次农业作业中农用设备事故率之间的关系。

结果

2005年至2010年期间,美国中西部上游地区和大平原地区共报告了7083起涉及农用设备的事故。随着州照明和标识评分每提高5个单位,事故率降低17%(率比=0.83;95%置信区间0.78至0.88)。仅照明政策(率比=0.48;95%置信区间0.45至0.51)和仅标识政策(率比=0.89;95%置信区间0.83至0.96)均与事故率降低相关。

结论

使照明和标识政策符合ASABE标准可能有效降低涉及农用设备的事故率。

相似文献

1
Lighting and marking policies are associated with reduced farm equipment-related crash rates: a policy analysis of nine Midwestern US states.照明和标识政策与降低农用设备相关碰撞率有关:对美国中西部九个州的政策分析
Occup Environ Med. 2016 Sep;73(9):621-6. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-103672. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
2
Not just a rural occurrence: differences in agricultural equipment crash characteristics by rural-urban crash site and proximity to town.不仅仅是农村地区的现象:农村-城市事故现场和靠近城镇的位置不同,农业设备碰撞特征也不同。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Sep;70:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
3
Farm Equipment-Motor Vehicle Crash Prevention Conference (FEMVCPC).农机-机动车碰撞预防会议(FEMVCPC)。
J Agromedicine. 2010 Apr;15(2):92-5. doi: 10.1080/10599241003627144.
4
Injury risks for on-road farm equipment and horse and buggy crashes in Pennsylvania: 2010-2013.宾夕法尼亚州道路上农用设备以及马车碰撞事故的受伤风险:2010 - 2013年
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Apr 3;18(3):286-292. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1198009. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
5
A Systematic Review of Large Agriculture Vehicles Use and Crash Incidents on Public Roads.大型农业车辆在公共道路上的使用与事故的系统评价
J Agromedicine. 2020 Jan;25(1):14-27. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2019.1593275. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
6
Summary of Roadway Incidents Involving Farm Equipment in Five Midwestern States Using the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS).五中西部州使用致命事故分析报告系统(FARS)的涉及农用设备的道路事故摘要。
J Agromedicine. 2024 Jul;29(3):504-507. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2024.2333552. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
7
Farm vehicle crashes on public roads: Analysis of farm-level factors.农田作业车在公共道路上发生事故:农场层面因素分析。
J Rural Health. 2022 Jun;38(3):537-545. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12621. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
8
Farmers' perceptions and concerns: the risks of driving farm vehicles on rural roadways in North Carolina.农民的认知与担忧:在北卡罗来纳州乡村道路上驾驶农用车辆的风险
J Agric Saf Health. 2003 Nov;9(4):327-48. doi: 10.13031/2013.15461.
9
Evaluation of a policy to reduce youth tractor crashes on public roads.一项减少公共道路上青少年拖拉机碰撞事故政策的评估。
Inj Prev. 2006 Feb;12(1):46-51. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.008771.
10
Characteristics of crashes with farm equipment that increase potential for injury.与农用设备碰撞的特征增加了受伤的可能性。
J Rural Health. 2007 Autumn;23(4):339-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2007.00112.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Community engagement in the development and implementation of a rural road safety campaign: Steps and lessons learned.社区参与农村道路安全宣传活动的开展与实施:步骤及经验教训
J Transp Health. 2021 Dec;23. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101282.
2
Evaluation of Self-Reported Agricultural Tasks, Safety Concerns, and Health and Safety Behaviors of Young Adults in U.S. Collegiate Agricultural Programs.对美国大学农业项目中青年成年人自我报告的农业任务、安全担忧以及健康与安全行为的评估。
Safety (Basel). 2021 Jun 3;7(2). doi: 10.3390/safety7020044.
3
Prevalence of alcohol impairment and odds of a driver injury or fatality in on-road farm equipment crashes.

本文引用的文献

1
Alcohol policies and impaired driving in the United States: Effects of driving- vs. drinking-oriented policies.美国的酒精政策与酒驾:以驾驶为导向和以饮酒为导向的政策的影响。
Int J Alcohol Drug Res. 2015;4(2):119-130. doi: 10.7895/ijadr.v4i2.205.
2
Associations Between Antibullying Policies and Bullying in 25 States.25个州反欺凌政策与欺凌行为之间的关联
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Oct;169(10):e152411. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2411. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
3
Tightness-looseness across the 50 united states.50 个州的紧松度。
道路农用设备碰撞事故中酒精损害的发生率及驾驶员受伤或死亡的几率。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Apr 3;19(3):230-234. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1407924. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 3;111(22):7990-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317937111. Epub 2014 May 19.
4
Not just a rural occurrence: differences in agricultural equipment crash characteristics by rural-urban crash site and proximity to town.不仅仅是农村地区的现象:农村-城市事故现场和靠近城镇的位置不同,农业设备碰撞特征也不同。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Sep;70:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
5
Inclusive anti-bullying policies and reduced risk of suicide attempts in lesbian and gay youth.包容的反欺凌政策可降低女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋青年自杀企图的风险。
J Adolesc Health. 2013 Jul;53(1 Suppl):S21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.08.010.
6
An evaluation of graduated driver licensing effects on fatal crash involvements of young drivers in the United States.评估美国青年驾驶员的分级驾照制度对致命撞车事故中的参与情况的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2011 Oct;12(5):423-31. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.588296.
7
State laws restricting driver use of mobile communications devices distracted-driving provisions, 1992-2010.州法律限制驾驶员使用移动通信设备分心驾驶条款,1992-2010 年。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jun;40(6):659-65. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.024.
8
Tractors and rollover protection in the United States.美国的拖拉机和翻滚保护装置。
J Agromedicine. 2010 Jul;15(3):249-63. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2010.484309.
9
Long-term effects of repealing the national maximum speed limit in the United States.废除美国全国最高限速的长期影响。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Sep;99(9):1626-31. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.153726. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
10
Motorcycle helmet laws in the United States from 1990 to 2005: politics and public health.1990年至2005年美国的摩托车头盔法律:政治与公共卫生
Am J Public Health. 2009 Mar;99(3):415-23. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.134106. Epub 2008 Dec 23.