Weathers Shiao-Pei, Han Xiaosi, Liu Diane D, Conrad Charles A, Gilbert Mark R, Loghin Monica E, O'Brien Barbara J, Penas-Prado Marta, Puduvalli Vinay K, Tremont-Lukats Ivo, Colen Rivka R, Yung W K Alfred, de Groot John F
Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 431, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1020 Faculty Office Tower, 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
J Neurooncol. 2016 Sep;129(3):487-494. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2195-9. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
Antiangiogenic therapy can rapidly reduce vascular permeability and cerebral edema but high doses of bevacizumab may induce selective pressure to promote resistance. This trial evaluated the efficacy of low dose bevacizumab in combination with lomustine (CCNU) compared to standard dose bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Patients (N = 71) with recurrent glioblastoma who previously received radiation and temozolomide were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive bevacizumab monotherapy (10 mg/kg) or low dose bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) in combination with lomustine (90 mg/m(2)). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) based on a blinded, independent radiographic assessment of post-contrast T1-weighted and non-contrast T2/FLAIR weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using RANO criteria. For 69 evaluable patients, median PFS was not significantly longer in the low dose bevacizumab + lomustine arm (4.34 months, CI 2.96-8.34) compared to the bevacizumab alone arm (4.11 months, CI 2.69-5.55, p = 0.19). In patients with first recurrence, there was a trend towards longer median PFS time in the low dose bevacizumab + lomustine arm (4.96 months, CI 4.17-13.44) compared to the bevacizumab alone arm (3.22 months CI 2.5-6.01, p = 0.08). The combination of low dose bevacizumab plus lomustine was not superior to standard dose bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Although the study was not designed to exclusively evaluate patients at first recurrence, a strong trend towards improved PFS was seen in that subgroup for the combination of low dose bevacizumab plus lomustine. Further studies are needed to better identify such subgroups that may most benefit from the combination treatment.
抗血管生成疗法可迅速降低血管通透性和脑水肿,但高剂量贝伐单抗可能会产生选择性压力,促使肿瘤产生耐药性。本试验评估了低剂量贝伐单抗联合洛莫司汀(环己亚硝脲)与标准剂量贝伐单抗相比,在复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者中的疗效。既往接受过放疗和替莫唑胺治疗的复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者(N = 71)被随机分为1:1两组,分别接受贝伐单抗单药治疗(10 mg/kg)或低剂量贝伐单抗(5 mg/kg)联合洛莫司汀(90 mg/m²)治疗。主要终点是基于使用RANO标准对增强T1加权和非增强T2/FLAIR加权磁共振成像(MRI)进行的盲法、独立影像学评估得出的无进展生存期(PFS)。对于69例可评估患者,低剂量贝伐单抗联合洛莫司汀组的中位PFS(4.34个月,CI 2.96 - 8.34)与单独使用贝伐单抗组(4.11个月,CI 2.69 - 5.55,p = 0.19)相比,并无显著延长。在首次复发的患者中,低剂量贝伐单抗联合洛莫司汀组的中位PFS时间有延长趋势(4.96个月,CI 4.17 - 13.44),而单独使用贝伐单抗组为(3.22个月,CI 2.5 - 6.01,p = 0.08)。低剂量贝伐单抗联合洛莫司汀在复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者中并不优于标准剂量贝伐单抗。尽管该研究并非专门设计用于评估首次复发的患者,但在该亚组中,低剂量贝伐单抗联合洛莫司汀治疗显示出PFS改善的明显趋势。需要进一步研究以更好地确定可能最受益于联合治疗的此类亚组。