• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏再同步治疗的多模态心脏成像指导。

Cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by multimodality cardiac imaging.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University of Ferrara, S. Anna Hospital, Cona-Ferrara, Italy.

Department of Radiology, University of Ferrara, S. Anna Hospital, Cona-Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Nov;18(11):1375-1382. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.605. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1002/ejhf.605
PMID:27406979
Abstract

AIMS

Up to 30-45% of implanted patients are non-responders to CRT. We evaluated the role of a 'CRT team' using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and longitudinal myocardial strain to identify the target area defined as the most delayed and viable region for LV pacing.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 100 heart failure patients candidates for CRT divided into two groups were enrolled. Group 1 consisted of 50 consecutive patients scheduled for CRT and prospectively included. Group 2 (control) consisted of 50 patients with a CRT device implanted according to standard clinical practice and matched for age, sex, and LVEF with group 1. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 6-month follow-up. In group 1, patients underwent two-dimensional speckle-tracking assessment of longitudinal myocardial strain and CMR imaging to identify the target area for LV lead pacing. A positive response to CRT was defined as a reduction of ≥15% of the LV end-systolic volume at 6-month follow-up. A total of 39 (78%) patients of group 1 were classified as responders to CRT whilst in group 2, only 28 (56%) were responders (P = 0.019). The 'CRT team' identified as target for LV pacing the lateral area in 30 (60%) patients, and the anterolateral or posterolateral areas in 12 (24%) patients. In 8 (16%) patients, the target was far from the lateral area, in the anterior or posterior areas. The patients with concordant position exhibited the highest positive response (93.1%) to CRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodality cardiac imaging as a guide for CRT implantation is useful to increase response rate.

摘要

目的

多达 30-45%的植入患者对 CRT 无反应。我们评估了“CRT 团队”的作用,使用心脏磁共振(CMR)和纵向心肌应变来确定目标区域,该区域定义为 LV 起搏的延迟最严重和最具活力的区域。

方法和结果

共纳入 100 名心力衰竭患者,分为两组。第 1 组为 50 例连续接受 CRT 并前瞻性纳入的患者。第 2 组(对照组)由 50 例根据标准临床实践植入 CRT 装置的患者组成,与第 1 组的年龄、性别和 LVEF 相匹配。患者在基线和 6 个月随访时进行评估。在第 1 组中,患者接受二维斑点追踪评估纵向心肌应变和 CMR 成像,以确定 LV 导联起搏的目标区域。CRT 的阳性反应定义为 6 个月随访时 LV 收缩末期容积减少≥15%。第 1 组共有 39 例(78%)患者被归类为 CRT 反应者,而第 2 组仅有 28 例(56%)患者为 CRT 反应者(P=0.019)。“CRT 团队”将 LV 起搏的目标区域确定为 30 例(60%)患者的侧区,12 例(24%)患者的前外侧或后外侧区。在 8 例(16%)患者中,目标区域远离侧区,在前区或后区。具有一致位置的患者对 CRT 的反应率最高(93.1%)。

结论

多模态心脏成像作为 CRT 植入的指导,有助于提高反应率。

相似文献

1
Cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by multimodality cardiac imaging.心脏再同步治疗的多模态心脏成像指导。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Nov;18(11):1375-1382. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.605. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
2
Multimodality imaging-guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a randomized controlled trial.多模态影像引导下心脏再同步治疗的左心室导线放置:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Nov;18(11):1365-1374. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.530. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
3
Using three-dimensional echocardiography to guide left ventricle lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy: does it make any difference.使用三维超声心动图指导心脏再同步治疗中左心室电极位置:有何不同吗?
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017 Apr;48(3):299-306. doi: 10.1007/s10840-017-0229-7. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
4
Right ventricular septal pacing as alternative for failed left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates.右室间隔部起搏作为心脏再同步治疗候选者中左心室起搏导线植入失败的替代方法。
Europace. 2015 Jan;17(1):94-100. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu259. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
5
Electrically vs. imaging-guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a randomized controlled trial.电引导与影像引导左心室导线放置在心脏再同步治疗中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Europace. 2019 Sep 1;21(9):1369-1377. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz184.
6
Prognostic benefit of optimum left ventricular lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy: follow-up of the TARGET Study Cohort (Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement to guide Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy).心脏再同步治疗中最佳左心室导线位置的预后获益:TARGET 研究队列的随访结果(靶向左心室导线位置指导心脏再同步治疗)。
JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Jun;2(3):205-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.11.010.
7
Targeted left ventricular lead placement to guide cardiac resynchronization therapy: the TARGET study: a randomized, controlled trial.靶向左心室导线放置指导心脏再同步治疗:TARGET 研究:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 24;59(17):1509-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.030. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
8
The impact of the right ventricular lead position on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.右心室导线位置对心脏再同步治疗反应的影响。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Apr;34(4):467-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02995.x. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
9
Left Ventricular Lead Position Guided by Parametric Strain Echocardiography Improves Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.参数应变超声心动图引导左心室导线位置可改善心脏再同步治疗反应。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Oct;30(10):1001-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
10
Cardiac resynchronization therapy when no lateral pacing option exists: vectorcardiographic guided non-lateral left ventricular lead placement predicts acute hemodynamic response.当不存在外侧起搏选择时的心脏再同步治疗:向量心电图引导的非外侧左心室导联放置预测急性血液动力学反应。
Europace. 2018 Aug 1;20(8):1294-1302. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux249.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Insights and Novel Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance-Based Techniques in the Prognosis of Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.基于心血管磁共振成像的非缺血性扩张型心肌病预后的当前见解与新技术
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 9;13(4):1017. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041017.
2
Device therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.心脏机械装置治疗射血分数保留的心力衰竭合并心房颤动
Heart Fail Rev. 2024 Mar;29(2):417-430. doi: 10.1007/s10741-023-10366-7. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
3
Targeted left ventricular lead positioning to the site of latest activation in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
心脏再同步治疗中靶向左心室导线放置到最新激活部位:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Europace. 2023 Aug 2;25(9). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad267.
4
Conduction system pacing on track to replace CRT? Review of current evidence and prospects of conduction system pacing.传导系统起搏有望取代心脏再同步治疗?当前证据及传导系统起搏前景综述
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Aug 15;10:1220709. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1220709. eCollection 2023.
5
The role of cardiac magnetic resonance in identifying appropriate candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy - a systematic review of the literature.心脏磁共振成像在识别心脏再同步治疗合适候选者中的作用——文献系统综述
Heart Fail Rev. 2022 Nov;27(6):2095-2118. doi: 10.1007/s10741-022-10263-5. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
6
Cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes with left ventricular lead concordant with latest mechanical activation: A meta-analysis.左心室导线与最新机械激活一致的心脏再同步治疗结果:一项荟萃分析。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Aug;45(8):930-939. doi: 10.1111/pace.14549. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
7
Image-guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: focused on image fusion methods.心脏再同步治疗中影像引导下的左心室导线置入:聚焦于影像融合方法
J Appl Biomed. 2019 Dec;17(4):199-208. doi: 10.32725/jab.2019.019. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
8
A Novel High-Resolution Surface Electrocardiographic Method to Identify and Characterize Myocardial Scar: A Proof-of-Concept Study.一种用于识别和表征心肌瘢痕的新型高分辨率体表心电图方法:概念验证研究。
CJC Open. 2021 May 27;3(10):1207-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.05.010. eCollection 2021 Oct.
9
Comparative efficacy of image-guided techniques in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a meta-analysis.基于影像学引导技术的心脏再同步化治疗的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 May 24;21(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02061-y.
10
Segment length in cine (SLICE) strain analysis: a practical approach to estimate potential benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy.电影节段长度(SLICE)应变分析:一种估计心脏再同步治疗潜在获益的实用方法。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021 Jan 11;23(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00701-4.