Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No.300, Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huaian, Jiangsu, China.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 May 24;21(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02061-y.
Several studies have illustrated the use of echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and nuclear imaging to optimize left ventricular (LV) lead placement to enhance the response of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to determine the incremental efficacy of image-guided CRT over standard CRT.
We searched PubMed, Cochrane library, and EMBASE to identify relevant studies. The outcome measures of cardiac function and clinical outcomes were CRT response, concordance of the LV lead to the latest sites of contraction (concordance of LV), heart failure (HF) hospitalization, mortality rates, changes of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV).
The study population comprised 1075 patients from eight studies. 544 patients underwent image-guided CRT implantation and 531 underwent routine implantation without imaging guidance. The image-guided group had a significantly higher CRT response and more on-target LV lead placement than the control group (RR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.21 to 1.47]; p < 0.01 and RR, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.92]; p < 0.05, respectively). The reduction of LVESV in the image-guided group was significantly greater than that in the control group (weighted mean difference, - 12.46 [95% CI, - 18.89 to - 6.03]; p < 0.01). The improvement in LVEF was significantly higher in the image-guided group (weighted mean difference, 3.25 [95% CI, 1.80 to 4.70]; p < 0.01). Pooled data demonstrated no significant difference in HF hospitalization and mortality rates between two groups (RR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.16 to 5.08]; p = 0.90, RR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.37 to 1.29]; p = 0.24, respectively).
This meta-analysis indicates that image-guided CRT is correlated with improved CRT volumetric response and cardiac function in heart failure patients but not with lower hospitalization or mortality rate.
多项研究表明,超声心动图、磁共振成像和核成像可用于优化左心室(LV)导线的放置,以提高心力衰竭患者心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的反应。我们旨在进行荟萃分析,以确定图像引导 CRT 比标准 CRT 的附加疗效。
我们检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 EMBASE 以确定相关研究。心脏功能和临床结局的结局测量指标包括 CRT 反应、LV 导线与最新收缩部位的一致性(LV 一致性)、心力衰竭(HF)住院、死亡率、左心室射血分数(LVEF)的变化和左心室收缩末期容积(LVESV)。
该研究人群由 8 项研究中的 1075 例患者组成。544 例患者接受了图像引导 CRT 植入,531 例患者接受了常规植入而未进行影像学引导。图像引导组的 CRT 反应和更准确的 LV 导线放置明显高于对照组(RR,1.33[95%CI,1.21 至 1.47];p<0.01 和 RR,1.39[95%CI,1.01 至 1.92];p<0.05,分别)。图像引导组的 LVESV 降低明显大于对照组(加权均数差,-12.46[95%CI,-18.89 至-6.03];p<0.01)。图像引导组的 LVEF 改善明显高于对照组(加权均数差,3.25[95%CI,1.80 至 4.70];p<0.01)。汇总数据显示两组 HF 住院率和死亡率无显著差异(RR,0.89[95%CI,0.16 至 5.08];p=0.90,RR,0.69[95%CI,0.37 至 1.29];p=0.24,分别)。
本荟萃分析表明,图像引导 CRT 与心力衰竭患者 CRT 容积反应和心功能的改善相关,但与住院率或死亡率的降低无关。