Suppr超能文献

友善且聪明有时并非好事:社交能力与能力的可取性取决于道德。

When It's Bad to Be Friendly and Smart: The Desirability of Sociability and Competence Depends on Morality.

作者信息

Landy Justin F, Piazza Jared, Goodwin Geoffrey P

机构信息

The University of Chicago, IL, USA

Lancaster University, UK.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Sep;42(9):1272-90. doi: 10.1177/0146167216655984. Epub 2016 Jul 12.

Abstract

Morality, sociability, and competence are distinct dimensions in person perception. We argue that a person's morality informs us about their likely intentions, whereas their competence and sociability inform us about the likelihood that they will fulfill those intentions. Accordingly, we hypothesized that whereas morality would be considered unconditionally positive, sociability and competence would be highly positive only in moral others, and would be less positive in immoral others. Using exploratory factor analyses, Studies 1a and 1b distinguished evaluations of morality and sociability. Studies 2 to 5 then showed that sociability and competence are evaluated positively contingent on morality-Study 2 demonstrated this phenomenon, while the remaining studies explained it (Study 3), generalized it (Studies 3-5), and ruled out an alternative explanation for it (Study 5). Study 6 showed that the positivity of morality traits is independent of other morality traits. These results support a functionalist account of these dimensions of person perception.

摘要

道德、社交能力和能力水平是人物认知中的不同维度。我们认为,一个人的道德能让我们了解其可能的意图,而其能力水平和社交能力则能让我们了解其实现这些意图的可能性。因此,我们假设,道德会被视为无条件积极的,而社交能力和能力水平只有在道德高尚的人身上才会被高度评价为积极的,在不道德的人身上则没那么积极。通过探索性因素分析,研究1a和1b区分了对道德和社交能力的评价。研究2至5随后表明,社交能力和能力水平的积极评价取决于道德——研究2证明了这一现象,其余研究则对其进行了解释(研究3)、推广(研究3 - 5)并排除了对此的另一种解释(研究5)。研究6表明,道德特质的积极性独立于其他道德特质。这些结果支持了关于人物认知这些维度的功能主义观点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验