Sayans-Jiménez Pablo, Rojas Tejada Antonio José, Cuadrado Guirado Isabel
University of Almería, Spain.
Centre for the Study of Migrations and Intercultural Relations (CEMyRI), University of Almería, Spain.
Scand J Psychol. 2017 Apr;58(2):170-178. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12346. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
Competence, morality and sociability dimensions have shown to be essential to measure stereotypes. Theoretically, the attributes associated with the negative pole of morality are more reliable and have shown to have higher evaluative weight. However, the current research usually employs only positive attributes to measure each dimension. Since the advantages of the inclusion of negative morality are clear it would be interesting to know about the effects of the inclusion of such type of attributes (i.e., it is good or bad for the measurement). The purpose of this study is to examine if the addition of negative items makes possible to improve the stereotype content measures. This study compares the differences between scales with various compositions of positive and negative items of stereotypes to predict three related variables: anger, fear and a semantic differential of evaluation. The study was carried out with a sample of 550 Spaniards. The data found highlights the importance of using attributes of the negative pole of morality in studying stereotypes. Their use was able to explain the intergroup emotional responses and the semantic differential more efficiently.
能力、道德和社交维度已被证明是衡量刻板印象的关键要素。从理论上讲,与道德负极相关的属性更为可靠,且已显示出具有更高的评价权重。然而,当前的研究通常仅采用积极属性来衡量每个维度。鉴于纳入消极道德属性的优势显而易见,了解此类属性的纳入所产生的影响(即对测量是好是坏)将会很有意思。本研究的目的是检验添加消极项目是否能够改进刻板印象内容的测量。本研究比较了具有不同刻板印象正负项目构成的量表之间的差异,以预测三个相关变量:愤怒、恐惧和评价语义差异。该研究以550名西班牙人为样本进行。研究所得数据凸显了在研究刻板印象时使用道德负极属性的重要性。它们的使用能够更有效地解释群体间的情绪反应和语义差异。