• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伴侣的外向性和宜人性对信任的影响。

The Effects of Partner Extraversion and Agreeableness on Trust.

机构信息

Tilburg University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Jul;49(7):1028-1042. doi: 10.1177/01461672221086768. Epub 2022 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1177/01461672221086768
PMID:35481439
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10302358/
Abstract

Existing research has documented the social benefits (i.e., higher popularity and liking) of extraversion and agreeableness. Do these positive reputational consequences extend to social dilemma situations that require trust? We found that people do not trust extraverts more than introverts. Instead, people's trust decisions are guided by their partner's level of agreeableness. In a trust game (Studies 1 and 2), individuals were more likely to trust a partner who was described as agreeable (vs. disagreeable); and, in a laboratory study of work groups, participants trusted more (vs. less) agreeable group members (Study 3). Individuals anticipated others' preferences for agreeable partners and tried to come across as more agreeable, but not more extraverted, in social dilemmas (Study 4). These findings suggest that the social benefits of agreeableness (but not extraversion) extend to social interactions involving trust and highlight the importance of target personality traits in shaping trust decisions.

摘要

现有研究记录了外向性和宜人性的社交益处(即更高的人气和喜爱度)。这些积极的声誉后果是否会延伸到需要信任的社交困境情境中?我们发现,人们不会比内向者更信任外向者。相反,人们的信任决策取决于他们伴侣的宜人性水平。在信任游戏(研究 1 和 2)中,个体更有可能信任被描述为宜人性(而非不友好)的伴侣;在一项关于工作群体的实验室研究中,参与者更信任(而非更少信任)宜人性更高的群体成员(研究 3)。个体预期他人会喜欢宜人性的伴侣,并试图在社交困境中表现得更加宜人性(而非更加外向),但不是更加外向(研究 4)。这些发现表明,宜人性(而非外向性)的社交益处会延伸到涉及信任的社交互动中,并强调目标人格特质在塑造信任决策中的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28f5/10302358/07e013194a95/10.1177_01461672221086768-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28f5/10302358/f2205ee707f5/10.1177_01461672221086768-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28f5/10302358/5fc2b7dab5f3/10.1177_01461672221086768-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28f5/10302358/5e8ff8ce691c/10.1177_01461672221086768-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28f5/10302358/07e013194a95/10.1177_01461672221086768-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28f5/10302358/f2205ee707f5/10.1177_01461672221086768-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28f5/10302358/5fc2b7dab5f3/10.1177_01461672221086768-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28f5/10302358/5e8ff8ce691c/10.1177_01461672221086768-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28f5/10302358/07e013194a95/10.1177_01461672221086768-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effects of Partner Extraversion and Agreeableness on Trust.伴侣的外向性和宜人性对信任的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Jul;49(7):1028-1042. doi: 10.1177/01461672221086768. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
2
Popularity, similarity, and the network extraversion bias.受欢迎程度、相似性与网络外向性偏差。
Psychol Sci. 2015 May;26(5):593-603. doi: 10.1177/0956797615569580. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
3
Effects of Gender and Personality on First Impression.性别与个性对第一印象的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 2;10(9):e0135529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135529. eCollection 2015.
4
Agreeableness, extraversion and life satisfaction: Investigating the mediating roles of social inclusion and status.宜人性、外向性与生活满意度:探究社会包容与地位的中介作用。
Scand J Psychol. 2021 Oct;62(5):752-762. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12755. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
5
Implicit policies about relations between personality traits and behavioral effectiveness in situational judgment items.情境判断项目中关于人格特质与行为有效性之间关系的隐性政策。
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Jul;91(4):749-61. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.749.
6
Extraversion, social interactions, and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: Did extraverts really suffer more than introverts?外向性、社交互动与新冠疫情期间的幸福感:外向者真的比内向者更痛苦吗?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Sep;125(3):649-679. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000468.
7
The Traits One Can Trust: Dissecting Reciprocity and Kindness as Determinants of Trustworthy Behavior.值得信赖的特质:剖析互惠与善良作为可信赖行为的决定因素
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Nov;41(11):1523-36. doi: 10.1177/0146167215600530. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
8
Do nice guys--and gals--really finish last? The joint effects of sex and agreeableness on income.好好先生(女士)真的会落得最后下场吗?性别和随和性对收入的综合影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Feb;102(2):390-407. doi: 10.1037/a0026021. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
9
Pessimistic expectations and poorer experiences: The role of (low) extraversion in anticipated and experienced enjoyment of social interaction.悲观的期望和较差的体验:(低)外向性在预期和体验社会互动的乐趣中的作用。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 5;13(7):e0199146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199146. eCollection 2018.
10
Are You Listening to Me? The Negative Link Between Extraversion and Perceived Listening.你在听我说话吗?外向与感知倾听之间的负面联系。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Jun;49(6):837-851. doi: 10.1177/01461672211072815. Epub 2022 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The Correlation between the MBTI-Based Personality Analysis of Anime Characters and Their Popularity.基于MBTI的动漫角色性格分析与其受欢迎程度之间的相关性。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jun 22;14(7):522. doi: 10.3390/bs14070522.
2
Association between Reaction Times in the Joint Simon Task and Personality Traits.联合西蒙任务中的反应时间与人格特质之间的关联。
Brain Sci. 2023 Aug 15;13(8):1207. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13081207.

本文引用的文献

1
Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis.人格与亲社会行为:理论框架与元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2020 Jan;146(1):30-90. doi: 10.1037/bul0000217.
2
Does forcing reduce faking? A meta-analytic review of forced-choice personality measures in high-stakes situations.强迫是否会减少伪装?高风险情境下迫选人格测验的元分析综述。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Nov;104(11):1347-1368. doi: 10.1037/apl0000414. Epub 2019 May 9.
3
Culture and problem-solving: Congruency between the cultural mindset of individualism versus collectivism and problem type.
文化与问题解决:个体主义与集体主义文化思维模式与问题类型的一致性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Jun;147(6):789-814. doi: 10.1037/xge0000444.
4
Stereotype Content: Warmth and Competence Endure.刻板印象内容:温暖与能力持久不变。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018 Apr;27(2):67-73. doi: 10.1177/0963721417738825. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
5
How Orthogonal Are the Big Two of Social Perception? On the Curvilinear Relation Between Agency and Communion.大社交知觉双因素的正交性如何?论能动性和共通性之间的曲线关系。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Jan;12(1):122-137. doi: 10.1177/1745691616657334.
6
Facets of the Fundamental Content Dimensions: Agency with Competence and Assertiveness-Communion with Warmth and Morality.基本内容维度的各个方面:具备能力与自信的能动性——兼具温暖与道德的亲和性。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 22;7:1810. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810. eCollection 2016.
7
When It's Bad to Be Friendly and Smart: The Desirability of Sociability and Competence Depends on Morality.友善且聪明有时并非好事:社交能力与能力的可取性取决于道德。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Sep;42(9):1272-90. doi: 10.1177/0146167216655984. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
8
The Traits One Can Trust: Dissecting Reciprocity and Kindness as Determinants of Trustworthy Behavior.值得信赖的特质:剖析互惠与善良作为可信赖行为的决定因素
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Nov;41(11):1523-36. doi: 10.1177/0146167215600530. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
9
Popularity, similarity, and the network extraversion bias.受欢迎程度、相似性与网络外向性偏差。
Psychol Sci. 2015 May;26(5):593-603. doi: 10.1177/0956797615569580. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
10
What does my avatar say about me? Inferring personality from avatars.我的头像能透露出关于我的什么信息?从头像推断个性。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Feb;41(2):237-49. doi: 10.1177/0146167214562761.