Khanduri K C
Classified Specialist (Anaesthesiology), Military Hospital, Ranikhet - 263 645.
Med J Armed Forces India. 2002 Apr;58(2):104-6. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(02)80038-7. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
The most commonly used technique in routine spinal anaesthesia practice is the midline approach, compared to the lateral or paramedian approach. With the better understanding of the technique and introduction of fine gauge spinal needles, this practice needs a rethinking. Lateral approach was used in 60 patients undergoing different surgical procedures below the umbilicus, using 24 or 25 gauge, Quincke spinal needle without an introducer. The result was gratifying. In 77% of the cases the subarachnoid space could be entered in the first attempt. There was no failure. No patient complained of postdural puncture headache or post operative backache. Only one patient reported paraesthesia during needle placement without any residual effect. Various other advantages of the technique are discussed. Thus with due practice, lateral approach is found to be superior in modern day spinal anaesthesia.
与侧入路或旁正中入路相比,常规脊髓麻醉实践中最常用的技术是正中入路。随着对该技术的更好理解以及细规格脊髓穿刺针的引入,这种做法需要重新思考。对60例接受脐以下不同外科手术的患者采用侧入路,使用24或25号无导引器的昆克脊髓穿刺针。结果令人满意。77%的病例在首次尝试时即可进入蛛网膜下腔。没有失败病例。没有患者抱怨硬膜穿刺后头痛或术后背痛。只有1例患者在穿刺针放置过程中报告有感觉异常,但没有任何残留影响。文中讨论了该技术的其他各种优点。因此,经过适当练习,发现侧入路在现代脊髓麻醉中更具优势。