Crausaz F M, de Tonnac N, Rolet S
Ther Umsch. 1989 May;46(5):319-24.
The evaluation and definition of excessive weight and obesity have greatly varied depending on the civilization and the era. These two themes have assumed importance under the influence of outside social pressures, and then medical criteria when obesity was associated with chronic illness and complications, for example, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Everyday, articles appear taking this or that method for losing weight, methods where the effects are often described as miraculous in the short term, but uncertain in the medium-term and unsatisfying or unknown in the long term. This is mainly due to drop out rates, a ack of precise epidemiological data concerning obesity and its treatment, and lack of long-term follow-up of patients. Also in the long term at least, there does not seem to be a big difference in weight loss whatever the method chosen. Taking into account the importance of psychological and social factors frequently encountered in overweight patients, we have chosen an integrated approach (internist, psychiatrist, dietician). The following article describes the methods used and offers some reflections after a first period of six months.
超重和肥胖的评估与定义在不同文明和时代有很大差异。在外部社会压力的影响下,这两个主题变得重要起来,之后当肥胖与慢性病和并发症(如糖尿病和高血压)相关联时,医学标准也随之产生。每天都有文章介绍各种减肥方法,这些方法的效果在短期内往往被描述为神奇,但中期效果不确定,长期效果则不尽人意或未知。这主要是由于退出率、缺乏关于肥胖及其治疗的确切流行病学数据以及对患者缺乏长期随访。而且至少从长期来看,无论选择何种方法,体重减轻似乎并没有太大差异。考虑到超重患者中经常遇到的心理和社会因素的重要性,我们选择了一种综合方法(内科医生、精神科医生、营养师)。以下文章描述了所使用的方法,并在六个月的第一阶段后给出了一些思考。