Niederstrasser Svenja Laura, Hammer Kerstin, Möllers Mareike, Falkenberg Maria Karina, Schmidt Rene, Steinhard Johannes, Klockenbusch Walter, Schmitz Ralf
J Perinat Med. 2017 Feb 1;45(2):193-198. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2015-0434.
The aim of this study was to compare transabdominal chorionic villus sampling, transcervical chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis with respect to their total fetal loss rates.
We retrospectively evaluated procedures of invasive prenatal testing performed during a 14-year period (2001-2014) including 936 amniocentesis procedures and 1051 chorionic villus samplings, of which 405 cases were executed transabdominally and 646 transcervically. Only singleton pregnancies before 24 weeks and 0 days of gestation where the pregnancy outcome was known were included. Fetal loss was defined as an abortion occurring either before 24 weeks and 0 days of gestation or <2 weeks after the procedure.
The total fetal loss rates were determined to be 1.73% for transabdominal chorionic villus sampling, 2.01% for transcervical chorionic villus sampling and 1.18% for amniocentesis. No statistically noticeable differences between the total fetal loss rates of all three procedures were found (P=0.399).
Our study has shown that chorionic villus sampling (either transabdominal or transcervical) and amniocentesis are equal methods for invasive prenatal testing with respect to their abortion risk.
本研究旨在比较经腹绒毛取样、经宫颈绒毛取样和羊膜穿刺术的总胎儿丢失率。
我们回顾性评估了14年期间(2001 - 2014年)进行的侵入性产前检测程序,包括936例羊膜穿刺术和1051例绒毛取样,其中405例经腹进行,646例经宫颈进行。仅纳入妊娠24周0天前的单胎妊娠且已知妊娠结局的病例。胎儿丢失定义为在妊娠24周0天前或手术后<2周发生的流产。
经腹绒毛取样的总胎儿丢失率为1.73%,经宫颈绒毛取样为2.01%,羊膜穿刺术为1.18%。三种程序的总胎儿丢失率之间未发现统计学上的显著差异(P = 0.399)。
我们的研究表明,绒毛取样(经腹或经宫颈)和羊膜穿刺术在流产风险方面是侵入性产前检测等同的方法。