Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford, California.
Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford, California.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jul 19;68(3):313-321. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.599.
Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease worldwide. The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and the European Society of Cardiology periodically release practice guidelines to guide clinicians in the management of NSTE-ACS, most recently in in 2014 and 2015, respectively. The present review compares and contrasts the 2 guidelines, with a focus on the strength of recommendation and level of evidence in the approach to initial presentation and diagnosis of NSTE-ACS, risk assessment, treatments, and systems of care. Important differences include the use of a rapid rule-out protocol with high-sensitivity troponin assays, a preference for prasugrel/ticagrelor and fondaparinux for anticoagulation therapy, and a preference for radial arterial access in the European Society of Cardiology guidelines compared with the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines. We also highlight the similarities and differences in the guidelines for special patient populations and suggest areas of further study.
非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)是全球心血管疾病发病率和死亡率的主要原因。美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会和欧洲心脏病学会定期发布实践指南,以指导临床医生管理 NSTE-ACS,最近分别在 2014 年和 2015 年发布。本综述比较和对比了这 2 个指南,重点关注初始表现和诊断 NSTE-ACS、风险评估、治疗和护理系统的推荐强度和证据水平。重要的差异包括使用高敏肌钙蛋白检测的快速排除方案、普拉格雷/替格瑞洛和磺达肝癸钠抗凝治疗的偏好,以及与美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会指南相比,欧洲心脏病学会指南中对桡动脉入路的偏好。我们还强调了特殊患者人群指南的相似和不同之处,并提出了进一步研究的领域。