• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将科学融入政治与政策:立法者作为心理健康政策传播研究受众的重要性

Infusing Science into Politics and Policy: The Importance of Legislators as an Audience in Mental Health Policy Dissemination Research.

作者信息

Purtle Jonathan, Brownson Ross C, Proctor Enola K

机构信息

Department of Health Management & Policy, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Nesbitt Hall, 3rd Floor, 3215 Market St., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Division of Public Health Sciences, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.

出版信息

Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 Mar;44(2):160-163. doi: 10.1007/s10488-016-0752-3.

DOI:10.1007/s10488-016-0752-3
PMID:27418342
Abstract

Legislators (i.e., elected Senators and House Representatives at the federal- and state-level) are a critically important dissemination audience because they shape the architecture of the US mental health system through budgetary and regulatory decisions. In this Point of View, we argue that legislators are a neglected audience in mental health dissemination research. We synthesize relevant research, discuss its potential implications for dissemination efforts, identify challenges, and outline areas for future study.

摘要

立法者(即联邦和州一级当选的参议员和众议院代表)是一个极其重要的传播受众群体,因为他们通过预算和监管决策塑造了美国心理健康系统的架构。在本观点文章中,我们认为立法者是心理健康传播研究中被忽视的受众群体。我们综合了相关研究,讨论其对传播工作的潜在影响,识别挑战,并概述未来研究的领域。

相似文献

1
Infusing Science into Politics and Policy: The Importance of Legislators as an Audience in Mental Health Policy Dissemination Research.将科学融入政治与政策:立法者作为心理健康政策传播研究受众的重要性
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 Mar;44(2):160-163. doi: 10.1007/s10488-016-0752-3.
2
Audience segmentation to disseminate behavioral health evidence to legislators: an empirical clustering analysis.向立法者传播行为健康证据的受众细分:一项实证聚类分析。
Implement Sci. 2018 Sep 19;13(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0816-8.
3
Health policy roundtable--view from the state legislature: translating research into policy.健康政策圆桌会议——来自州立法机构的观点:将研究转化为政策
Health Serv Res. 2005 Apr;40(2):337-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00359.x.
4
Comparison of Research Framing Preferences and Information Use of State Legislators and Advocates Involved in Cancer Control, United States, 2012-2013.2012 - 2013年美国参与癌症控制的州立法者与倡导者的研究框架偏好及信息使用情况比较
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Feb 2;14:E10. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.160292.
5
State legislators' sources and use of information: bridging the gap between research and policy.州立法者的信息来源与使用:弥合研究与政策之间的差距
Health Educ Res. 2015 Dec;30(6):840-8. doi: 10.1093/her/cyv044. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
6
Mental health policy and the political process.
Am J Psychiatry. 1983 Jul;140(7):875-6. doi: 10.1176/ajp.140.7.875.
7
The patient as a policy factor: a historical case study of the consumer/survivor movement in mental health.作为政策因素的患者:心理健康领域消费者/幸存者运动的历史案例研究
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 May-Jun;25(3):720-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.3.720.
8
Partisan differences in the effects of economic evidence and local data on legislator engagement with dissemination materials about behavioral health: a dissemination trial.党派差异对经济证据和当地数据影响立法者参与传播行为健康材料的作用:一项传播试验。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jun 22;17(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01214-7.
9
Science and public health policy makers.科学和公共卫生政策制定者。
J Law Med Ethics. 2005 Winter;33(4 Suppl):89-93.
10
Legislators' Sources of Behavioral Health Research and Preferences for Dissemination: Variations by Political Party.立法者的行为健康研究来源和传播偏好:按政党划分的差异。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Oct 1;69(10):1105-1108. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800153. Epub 2018 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Unintended consequences of disseminating behavioral health evidence to policymakers: Results from a survey-based experiment.向政策制定者传播行为健康证据的意外后果:基于调查的实验结果。
Implement Res Pract. 2023 May 8;4:26334895231172807. doi: 10.1177/26334895231172807. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Who's "in the room where it happens"? A taxonomy and five-step methodology for identifying and characterizing policy actors.谁在“事情发生的房间”里?一种用于识别和描述政策行为者的分类法及五步方法。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Sep 18;4(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00492-6.
3
Quantitative measures used in empirical evaluations of mental health policy implementation: A systematic review.
心理健康政策实施实证评估中使用的定量措施:一项系统综述。
Implement Res Pract. 2022 Dec 4;3:26334895221141116. doi: 10.1177/26334895221141116. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
4
Measures of outer setting constructs for implementation research: A systematic review and analysis of psychometric quality.实施研究的外部环境构建测量:心理测量质量的系统评价与分析
Implement Res Pract. 2020 Jul 21;1:2633489520940022. doi: 10.1177/2633489520940022. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
5
A policy implementation study of earmarked taxes for mental health services: study protocol.一项关于心理健康服务专项税政策实施的研究:研究方案
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Mar 31;4(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00408-4.
6
Promoting the use of evidence in health policy-making in the economic commission of the West African States Region: Exploring the perception of policy-makers on the necessity of an evidence-based policy-making guidance.促进西非国家经济共同体区域卫生决策中证据的使用:探索政策制定者对制定循证政策指南必要性的看法。
Ann Afr Med. 2022 Jul-Sep;21(3):223-230. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_90_20.
7
A Qualitative Exploration of the Views of Policymakers and Policy Advisors on the Impact of Mental Health Stigma on the Development and Implementation of Mental Health Policy in Singapore.新加坡政策制定者和政策顾问对心理健康污名对心理健康政策制定和实施的影响的看法的定性探讨。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2022 May;49(3):404-414. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01171-1. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
8
Policy Makers' Priorities for Addressing Youth Substance Use and Factors That Influence Priorities.政策制定者解决青少年药物使用问题的优先事项及影响优先事项的因素。
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 Apr 1;73(4):388-395. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000919. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
9
Policy Implementation Science to Advance Population Health: The Potential for Learning Health Policy Systems.政策实施科学促进人群健康:学习卫生政策系统的潜力。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 17;9:681602. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.681602. eCollection 2021.
10
Dietary Policies and Programs: Moving Beyond Efficacy and Into "Real-World" Settings.饮食政策与计划:超越有效性,迈向“现实世界”场景。
Health Equity. 2021 Apr 19;5(1):194-202. doi: 10.1089/heq.2020.0050. eCollection 2021.