• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
State legislators' sources and use of information: bridging the gap between research and policy.州立法者的信息来源与使用:弥合研究与政策之间的差距
Health Educ Res. 2015 Dec;30(6):840-8. doi: 10.1093/her/cyv044. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
2
Comparison of Research Framing Preferences and Information Use of State Legislators and Advocates Involved in Cancer Control, United States, 2012-2013.2012 - 2013年美国参与癌症控制的州立法者与倡导者的研究框架偏好及信息使用情况比较
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Feb 2;14:E10. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.160292.
3
State legislators' work on public health-related issues: what influences priorities?州立法者在公共卫生相关问题上的工作:哪些因素影响优先事项?
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):25-9. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318246475c.
4
"My good friends on the other side of the aisle aren't bothered by those facts": U.S. State legislators' use of evidence in making policy on abortion.“过道另一边的好朋友们并不为这些事实所困扰”:美国州议员在制定堕胎政策时使用证据。
Contraception. 2020 Apr;101(4):249-255. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.11.009. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
5
Legislators' Sources of Behavioral Health Research and Preferences for Dissemination: Variations by Political Party.立法者的行为健康研究来源和传播偏好:按政党划分的差异。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Oct 1;69(10):1105-1108. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800153. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
6
Accessing evidence to inform public health policy: a study to enhance advocacy.获取用于为公共卫生政策提供信息的证据:一项加强宣传的研究
Public Health. 2015 Jun;129(6):698-704. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.02.016. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
7
Are tobacco industry campaign contributions influencing state legislative behavior?烟草行业的竞选捐款正在影响州立法行为吗?
Am J Public Health. 1998 Jun;88(6):918-23. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.6.918.
8
Addressing Health and Well-Being Through State Policy: Understanding Barriers and Opportunities for Policy-Making to Prevent Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) in South Carolina.通过州政策解决健康和福祉问题:了解南卡罗来纳州制定政策预防不良儿童经历 (ACEs) 的障碍和机遇。
Am J Health Promot. 2020 Feb;34(2):189-197. doi: 10.1177/0890117119878068. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
9
Predictors of state legislators' intentions to vote for cigarette tax increases.州立法者投票支持提高香烟税意图的预测因素。
Prev Med. 1998 Mar-Apr;27(2):157-65. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0308.
10
Leveraging Public Health Research to Inform State Legislative Policy that Promotes Health for Children and Families.利用公共卫生研究为促进儿童和家庭健康的州立法政策提供信息。
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Jun;23(6):733-738. doi: 10.1007/s10995-018-02708-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Research outcomes informing the selection of public health interventions and strategies to implement them: A cross-sectional survey of Australian policy-maker and practitioner preferences.研究结果为公共卫生干预措施和实施策略的选择提供信息:澳大利亚政策制定者和实践者偏好的横断面调查。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 May 14;22(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01144-4.
2
Effectively communicating with local policymakers: a randomized trial of policy brief dissemination to address obesity.有效沟通当地政策制定者:传播政策简报以解决肥胖问题的随机试验。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 8;12:1246897. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1246897. eCollection 2024.
3
Dissemination of public health research to prevent non-communicable diseases: a scoping review.向公众传播预防非传染性疾病的公共卫生研究:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 24;23(1):757. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15622-x.
4
Open science at the science-policy interface: bringing in the evidence?科学政策接口的开放科学:引入证据?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jun 20;20(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00867-6.
5
Dispersion of contraceptive access policies across the United States from 2006 to 2021.2006年至2021年美国各地避孕服务获取政策的差异
Prev Med Rep. 2022 May 13;27:101827. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101827. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review.开放科学中的累积优势动态与公平性威胁:一项范围综述
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Jan 19;9(1):211032. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211032. eCollection 2022 Jan.
7
Embracing policy implementation science to ensure translation of evidence to cancer control policy.采用政策实施科学,确保将证据转化为癌症控制政策。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):1972-1979. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab147.
8
Policy Implementation Science to Advance Population Health: The Potential for Learning Health Policy Systems.政策实施科学促进人群健康:学习卫生政策系统的潜力。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 17;9:681602. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.681602. eCollection 2021.
9
European-wide policymaking at the urban level: a qualitative study.欧洲范围内的城市层面政策制定:一项定性研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Oct 26;31(5):931-936. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab016.
10
The Relationships Between State Health Department Practitioners' Perceptions of Organizational Supports and Evidence-Based Decision-Making Skills.州卫生部门从业者对组织支持的看法与循证决策技能之间的关系。
Public Health Rep. 2021 Nov-Dec;136(6):710-718. doi: 10.1177/0033354920984159. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Getting research to the policy table: a qualitative study with public health researchers on engaging with policy makers.将研究成果引入政策议程:一项针对公共卫生研究人员与政策制定者互动的定性研究
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Apr 30;12:E56. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140546.
2
A review of obesity-themed policy briefs.肥胖主题政策简报述评。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3 Suppl 2):S143-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.021.
3
Advocacy evaluation: challenges and emerging trends.宣传评估:挑战与新趋势
Health Promot Pract. 2012 Sep;13(5):581-6. doi: 10.1177/1524839912446482. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
4
Communicating evidence-based information on cancer prevention to state-level policy makers.向州级政策制定者传达癌症预防的循证信息。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Feb 16;103(4):306-16. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq529. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
5
Communicating prevention messages to policy makers: the role of stories in promoting physical activity.向政策制定者传达预防信息:故事在促进身体活动中的作用。
J Phys Act Health. 2010 Mar;7 Suppl 1(0 1):S99-107. doi: 10.1123/jpah.7.s1.s99.
6
The Voice of Experience: How Social Scientists Communicate Family Research to Policymakers.经验之声:社会科学家如何向政策制定者传达家庭研究成果。
Fam Relat. 2009 Mar 26;58(2):229-243. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00549.x.
7
Increasing the use of evidence in health policy: practice and views of policy makers and researchers.增加健康政策中证据的使用:政策制定者和研究人员的实践与观点
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2009 Aug 24;6:21. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-6-21.
8
Pathways to the use of health services research in policy.将卫生服务研究应用于政策的途径。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1111-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00958.x. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
9
Evidence-based public health: a fundamental concept for public health practice.循证公共卫生:公共卫生实践的一个基本概念。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:175-201. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100134.
10
Practice-based teaching for health policy action and advocacy.基于实践的卫生政策行动与宣传教学。
Public Health Rep. 2008;123 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):65-70. doi: 10.1177/00333549081230S209.

州立法者的信息来源与使用:弥合研究与政策之间的差距

State legislators' sources and use of information: bridging the gap between research and policy.

作者信息

Dodson Elizabeth A, Geary Nora A, Brownson Ross C

机构信息

Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA,

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA and.

出版信息

Health Educ Res. 2015 Dec;30(6):840-8. doi: 10.1093/her/cyv044. Epub 2015 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1093/her/cyv044
PMID:26464418
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4769321/
Abstract

Research can inform policymakers of public health issues and shape policy decisions, hopefully benefiting public health; thus, improving dissemination of research to policymakers is important for developing effective public health policies that improve health and health equity. However, the utilization of research among policymakers is often not fully realized. This study builds upon current knowledge about what types of information legislators seek when working on health issues and where they go for information. Further, it explores what kinds of information legislators find most helpful and if there are ways researchers could better provide this evidence. Key-informant interviews were conducted with 25 U.S. state legislators holding health committee leadership positions between July and November, 2010. Regarding types of information sought, most legislators discussed their desire for data and statistics when working on health-related issues. When asked about their most trusted sources of information, participants mentioned government sources as well as advocacy, lobby and industry groups. A few mentioned universities and healthcare professionals. Results from this study offer public health researchers and practitioners' insights into the types of information that may be most helpful to policymakers. Insights gathered may improve the dissemination of research and bridge the gap between knowledge users and knowledge producers.

摘要

研究可以让政策制定者了解公共卫生问题并形成政策决策,有望使公众健康受益;因此,改善向政策制定者传播研究成果对于制定有效的公共卫生政策以促进健康和健康公平至关重要。然而,政策制定者对研究的利用往往并未得到充分实现。本研究基于当前关于立法者在处理卫生问题时寻求何种类型信息以及他们从何处获取信息的知识。此外,它还探讨了立法者认为最有帮助的信息类型,以及研究人员是否有办法更好地提供此类证据。2010年7月至11月期间,对25位担任卫生委员会领导职务的美国州立法者进行了关键信息提供者访谈。关于所寻求信息的类型,大多数立法者在处理与健康相关问题时谈到了他们对数据和统计数据的需求。当被问及他们最信任的信息来源时,参与者提到了政府来源以及倡导、游说和行业团体。少数人提到了大学和医疗保健专业人员。本研究的结果为公共卫生研究人员和从业者提供了关于可能对政策制定者最有帮助的信息类型的见解。收集到的见解可能会改善研究的传播,并弥合知识使用者和知识生产者之间的差距。