Suppr超能文献

立法者的行为健康研究来源和传播偏好:按政党划分的差异。

Legislators' Sources of Behavioral Health Research and Preferences for Dissemination: Variations by Political Party.

机构信息

Dr. Purtle and Ms. Nelson are with the Department of Health Management and Policy, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia. Dr. Dodson and Dr. Brownson are with the Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis. Dr. Brownson is also with the Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis. Dr. Meisel is with the Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Oct 1;69(10):1105-1108. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800153. Epub 2018 Jul 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to characterize primary sources of behavioral health research and dissemination preferences of state legislators and assess differences by political party.

METHODS

A 2017 cross-sectional survey of state legislators (N=475) assessed where legislators seek, and the most important features of, behavioral health research. Bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression were conducted.

RESULTS

Advocacy organizations (53%), legislative staff (51%), and state agencies (48%) were identified most frequently as sources of behavioral health research. Universities were identified by significantly more Democrats than Republicans (34% versus 19%; adjusted odds ratio=1.79). Data about budget impact and cost-effectiveness were most frequently rated as very important, but by significantly fewer Democrats than Republicans (77% versus 87% and 76% versus 89%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

To reach legislators and satisfy their information preferences, behavioral health researchers should target diverse audiences, partner with intermediary organizations, and craft messages that include economic evaluation data.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述行为健康研究的主要来源和州议员对行为健康研究传播的偏好,并评估其党派差异。

方法

2017 年对州议员(N=475)进行了一项横断面调查,评估了议员们寻求行为健康研究的来源和最重要的特征。进行了单变量分析和多变量逻辑回归分析。

结果

倡导组织(53%)、立法工作人员(51%)和州机构(48%)被认为是行为健康研究的主要来源。民主党人比共和党人更频繁地认为大学是研究来源(34%比 19%;调整后的优势比=1.79)。关于预算影响和成本效益的数据被认为是最重要的,但民主党人的比例明显低于共和党人(77%比 87%和 76%比 89%)。

结论

为了接触到议员并满足他们的信息偏好,行为健康研究人员应该针对不同的受众,与中介组织合作,并制定包含经济评估数据的信息。

相似文献

1
Legislators' Sources of Behavioral Health Research and Preferences for Dissemination: Variations by Political Party.
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Oct 1;69(10):1105-1108. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800153. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
4
Unintended consequences of disseminating behavioral health evidence to policymakers: Results from a survey-based experiment.
Implement Res Pract. 2023 May 8;4:26334895231172807. doi: 10.1177/26334895231172807. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
State Legislators' Opinions About Adverse Childhood Experiences as Risk Factors for Adult Behavioral Health Conditions.
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Oct 1;70(10):894-900. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900175. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
6
State legislators' work on public health-related issues: what influences priorities?
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):25-9. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318246475c.
7
State mental health agency officials' preferences for and sources of behavioral health research.
Psychol Serv. 2020;17(S1):93-97. doi: 10.1037/ser0000364. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
8
State legislators' sources and use of information: bridging the gap between research and policy.
Health Educ Res. 2015 Dec;30(6):840-8. doi: 10.1093/her/cyv044. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
9
Nurse state legislators, 2013 to 2023.
Nurs Outlook. 2024 Jan-Feb;72(1):102102. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2023.102102. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
10
Legislators' positions on gay and lesbian rights: the personal and political.
J Homosex. 2010;57(7):928-43. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2010.493449.

引用本文的文献

2
Municipal officials' perspectives on policymaking for addressing obesity and health equity.
Evid Policy. 2023;19(3):444-464. doi: 10.1332/174426421x16793276974116.
3
Unintended consequences of disseminating behavioral health evidence to policymakers: Results from a survey-based experiment.
Implement Res Pract. 2023 May 8;4:26334895231172807. doi: 10.1177/26334895231172807. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
A policy implementation study of earmarked taxes for mental health services: study protocol.
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Mar 31;4(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00408-4.
9
Policy Makers' Priorities for Addressing Youth Substance Use and Factors That Influence Priorities.
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 Apr 1;73(4):388-395. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000919. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
10
A more practical guide to incorporating health equity domains in implementation determinant frameworks.
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jun 5;2(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00146-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Communication Strategies to Counter Stigma and Improve Mental Illness and Substance Use Disorder Policy.
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Feb 1;69(2):136-146. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700076. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
2
A Way Forward for Bipartisan Health Reform? Democrat and Republican State Legislator Priorities for the Goals of Health Policy.
Am J Public Health. 2017 Oct;107(10):1601-1603. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304023. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
5
Uses of Research Evidence by State Legislators Who Prioritize Behavioral Health Issues.
Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Dec 1;67(12):1355-1361. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500443. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
6
Economic Evaluations of Opioid Use Disorder Interventions.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Sep;34(9):863-87. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0400-5.
7
How Narrative Focus and a Statistical Map Shape Health Policy Support Among State Legislators.
Health Commun. 2016;31(2):242-55. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.998913. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
8
How Can the Use of Evidence in Mental Health Policy Be Increased? A Systematic Review.
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Aug 1;66(8):783-97. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400329. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
9
Social determinants of mental health.
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;26(4):392-407. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2014.928270.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验