Sarkar Urmimala, Gourley Gato I, Lyles Courtney R, Tieu Lina, Clarity Cassidy, Newmark Lisa, Singh Karandeep, Bates David W
Center for Vulnerable Populations at San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
DGIM at SFGH, 1001 Potrero Ave, Bldg 10, Ward 13, Box 1364, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Dec;31(12):1417-1426. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3771-6. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
Mobile applications or 'apps' intended to help people manage their health and chronic conditions are widespread and gaining in popularity. However, little is known about their acceptability and usability for low-income, racially/ethnically diverse populations who experience a disproportionate burden of chronic disease and its complications.
The objective of this study was to investigate the usability of existing mobile health applications ("apps") for diabetes, depression, and caregiving, in order to facilitate development and tailoring of patient-facing apps for diverse populations.
Usability testing, a mixed-methods approach that includes interviewing and direct observation of participant technology use, was conducted with participants (n = 9 caregivers; n = 10 patients with depression; and n = 10 patients with diabetes) on a total of 11 of the most popular health apps (four diabetes apps, four depression apps, and three caregiver apps) on both iPad and Android tablets.
The participants were diverse: 15 (58 %) African Americans, seven (27 %) Whites, two (8 %) Asians, two (8 %) Latinos with either diabetes, depression, or who were caregivers.
Participants were given condition-specific tasks, such as entering a blood glucose value into a diabetes app. Participant interviews were video recorded and were coded using standard methods to evaluate attempts and completions of tasks. We performed inductive coding of participant comments to identify emergent themes.
Participants completed 79 of 185 (43 %) tasks across 11 apps without assistance. Three themes emerged from participant comments: lack of confidence with technology, frustration with design features and navigation, and interest in having technology to support their self-management.
App developers should employ participatory design strategies in order to have an impact on chronic conditions such as diabetes and depression that disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. While patients express interest in using technologies for self-management, current tools are not consistently usable for diverse patients.
旨在帮助人们管理自身健康和慢性病的移动应用程序(即“应用”)广泛存在且日益流行。然而,对于那些慢性病及其并发症负担过重的低收入、种族/民族多样化人群而言,这些应用的可接受性和可用性却鲜为人知。
本研究的目的是调查现有用于糖尿病、抑郁症和护理的移动健康应用程序(“应用”)的可用性,以便为不同人群开发和定制面向患者的应用程序。
采用可用性测试这一混合方法,包括对参与者技术使用情况的访谈和直接观察,共有11款最受欢迎的健康应用程序(4款糖尿病应用程序、4款抑郁症应用程序和3款护理应用程序)在iPad和安卓平板电脑上对参与者(n = 9名护理人员;n = 10名抑郁症患者;n = 10名糖尿病患者)进行了测试。
参与者具有多样性:15名(58%)非裔美国人、7名(27%)白人、2名(8%)亚洲人、2名(8%)拉丁裔,他们患有糖尿病、抑郁症或为护理人员。
为参与者分配特定疾病的任务,例如在糖尿病应用程序中输入血糖值。对参与者的访谈进行视频记录,并使用标准方法进行编码,以评估任务的尝试和完成情况。我们对参与者的评论进行归纳编码,以识别新出现的主题。
参与者在没有帮助的情况下完成了11款应用程序中185项任务中的79项(43%)。参与者的评论中出现了三个主题:对技术缺乏信心、对设计功能和导航感到沮丧,以及对拥有支持自我管理的技术感兴趣。
应用程序开发者应采用参与式设计策略,以便对糖尿病和抑郁症等 disproportionately affect vulnerable populations 的慢性病产生影响。虽然患者表示有兴趣使用技术进行自我管理,但目前的工具对不同患者而言并非始终可用。