Spry V M, Hovell M F, Sallis J G, Hofsteter C R, Elder J P, Molgaard C A
Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, CA 92182.
Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Jul;130(1):166-72. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115309.
Three controlled experiments tested the efficacy of 1) a postcard or telephone prompt, 2) a lottery, 3) monetary incentives, and 4) questionnaire length to recruit adult survey respondents to a random sample of residences in San Diego, California, during 1986-1988. In experiment 1, the group randomly assigned to receive a telephone call prenotification plus the lottery incentive responded 26-66% more frequently than did controls (p = 0.02) after a single mailing. The postcard plus lottery was 17-54% more effective than no intervention with controls (p = 0.05). A second mailing of the survey weakened these effects. In experiment 2, the group randomly assigned to receive a two-page survey with the lottery announcement responded 69% more frequently after one mailing (p = 0.03) and 53% more frequently after a second mailing (p = 0.04) than the group that received an eight-page survey without the lottery incentive. The shorter form alone or the lottery alone did not increase response rates significantly relative to the long form without a lottery. In experiment 3, a monetary incentive of $5.00 contingent on response to the second mailing of the survey increased the rate of response from initial "nonresponders" by 100% relative to control who received no incentive (p = 0.03) and 75% over those who received $1.00 not contingent on response (p = 0.04). Little sampling bias and no reactivity was attributable to the recruitment procedures.
1)明信片或电话提示;2)抽奖;3)金钱激励;4)问卷长度,目的是在1986年至1988年期间招募成年调查对象,对加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥的住宅进行随机抽样。在实验1中,随机分配接受电话预通知加抽奖激励的组在单次邮寄后回复的频率比对照组高26% - 66%(p = 0.02)。明信片加抽奖比不进行干预的对照组有效17% - 54%(p = 0.05)。调查的第二次邮寄削弱了这些效果。在实验2中,随机分配接受带有抽奖通知的两页调查问卷的组在一次邮寄后回复频率比接受没有抽奖激励的八页调查问卷的组高69%(p = 0.03),在第二次邮寄后高53%(p = 0.04)。单独的简短问卷形式或单独的抽奖相对于没有抽奖的长问卷形式并没有显著提高回复率。在实验3中,以对调查问卷第二次邮寄的回复为条件给予5美元的金钱激励,相对于没有激励的对照组,使最初“无回复者”的回复率提高了100%(p = 0.03),比接受1美元但不以回复为条件的组高75%(p = 0.04)。招募程序几乎没有造成抽样偏差,也没有产生反应性。