School of Public Health and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Oct;18(10):2620-5. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0299. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
Optimizing participant response rates is important for obtaining representative samples and the timely completion of studies. It is a common practice to use participant incentives to boost response rates, but few studies have systematically examined their effectiveness, particularly among minority groups.
We experimentally tested three incentive strategies for their effectiveness in improving response rates among colorectal cancer cases (n = 3,816) and their relatives (n = 2,353). A 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design compared (a) registered versus first class mail, (b) $5 cash with the initial mailing (yes/no), and (c) $20 promise (yes/no) upon completion of the information form (for cases) or $10 promise (yes/no) upon completion of the baseline survey (for relatives). Outcome measures were provision of contact information on first-degree relatives for cases and completion of the baseline survey for relatives.
The response rate among cases was low in all ethnic groups (28-37%) and incentive strategies did not have an effect. Among relatives, the overall baseline survey response rate was 71%, ranging from 66% among Asians to 76% among Whites. Modest absolute increases were observed for payment schedules that included a $5 cash enclosure with the initial mailing in the total sample [odds ratio (OR), 1.65 and 1.47] and among Latinos (OR, 1.94 and 1.74) but not among Asians (OR, 1.61 and 1.55) or African Americans (OR, 1.19 and 1.02). Response rates were not influenced by registered versus first-class mailing.
The effects of incentives in this study were modest with some suggestion of differences by ethnic group and type of incentive.
提高参与者的回复率对于获得有代表性的样本和及时完成研究非常重要。使用参与者激励措施来提高回复率是一种常见做法,但很少有研究系统地检查它们的有效性,特别是在少数群体中。
我们通过实验测试了三种激励策略,以提高结肠癌病例(n=3816)及其亲属(n=2353)的回复率。采用 2x2x2 析因设计比较了(a)挂号信与平信,(b)首次邮寄时是否随信附上 5 美元现金(是/否),以及(c)完成信息表时是否承诺给予 20 美元(是/否)(针对病例)或完成基线调查时是否承诺给予 10 美元(是/否)(针对亲属)。病例提供一级亲属的联系方式,亲属完成基线调查作为结局指标。
所有族裔群体的病例回复率都较低(28-37%),激励策略没有效果。亲属的基线调查总回复率为 71%,从亚洲人的 66%到白人的 76%不等。在总样本中,初始邮件中随附 5 美元现金的支付方案[比值比(OR)为 1.65 和 1.47]以及拉丁裔人群(OR 为 1.94 和 1.74)观察到适度的绝对增长,但在亚洲人(OR 为 1.61 和 1.55)或非裔美国人(OR 为 1.19 和 1.02)中则没有观察到。挂号信与平信的邮寄方式对回复率没有影响。
本研究中的激励措施效果有限,提示激励措施的效果可能因族裔群体和激励类型的不同而有所差异。