Gawler S, Skelton D A, Dinan-Young S, Masud T, Morris R W, Griffin M, Kendrick D, Iliffe S
Research Dept. of Primary Care & Population Health, UCL, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill St., London NW3 2PF, UK.
School of Health & Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Nov-Dec;67:46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.06.019. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
Falls are common in the older UK population and associated costs to the NHS are high. Systematic reviews suggest that home exercise and group-based exercise interventions, which focus on progressively challenging balance and increasing strength, can reduce up to 42% of falls in those with a history of falls. The evidence is less clear for those older adults who are currently at low risk of falls.
ProAct65+, a large, cluster-randomised, controlled trial, investigated the effectiveness of a home exercise programme (Otago Exercise Programme (OEP)) and a group-based exercise programme (Falls Management Exercise (FaME)) compared to usual care (UC) at increasing moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). This paper examines the trial's secondary outcomes; the effectiveness of the interventions at reducing falls and falls-related injuries.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 1256 community-dwelling older adults (aged 65+) were recruited through GP practices in two sites (London and Nottingham). Frequent fallers (≥3 falls in last year) and those with unstable medical conditions were excluded, as were those already reaching the UK Government recommended levels of physical activity (PA) for health.
Baseline assessment (including assessment of health, function and previous falls) occurred before randomisation; the intervention period lasted 24 weeks and there was an immediate post-intervention assessment; participants were followed up every six months for 24 months. Falls data were analysed using negative binomial modelling.
Falls data were collected prospectively during the intervention period by 4-weekly diaries (6 in total). Falls recall was recorded at the 3-monthly follow-ups for a total of 24 months. Balance was measured at baseline and at the end of the intervention period using the Timed Up & Go and Functional Reach tests. Balance confidence (CONFbal), falls risk (FRAT) and falls self-efficacy (FES-I) were measured by questionnaire at baseline and at all subsequent assessment points.
294 participants (24%) reported one or two falls in the previous year. There was no increase in falls in either exercise group compared to UC during the intervention period (resulting from increased exposure to risk). The FaME arm experienced a significant reduction in injurious falls compared to UC (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.55, 95% CI 0.31, 0.96; p=0.04) and this continued during the 12 months after the end of the intervention (IRR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54, 0.99; p=0.05). There was also a significant reduction in the incidence of all falls (injurious and non-injurious) in the FaME arm compared with UC (IRR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55, 0.99; p=0.04) in the 12 month period following the cessation of the intervention. There was a non-significant reduction in the incidence of all falls in the OEP arm compared with UC (IRR 0.76, 95% CI 0.53, 1.09; p=0.14) in the 12 months following the cessation of the intervention. The effects on falls did not persist at the 24 months assessment in either exercise arm. However, when those in the FaME group who continued to achieve 150min of MVPA per week into the second post-intervention year were compared to those in the FaME group who did not maintain their physical activity, there was a significant reduction in falls incidence (IRR=0.49, 95% CI 0.30, 0.79; p=0.004). CONFbal was significantly improved at 12 months post intervention in both intervention arms compared with UC. There were no significant changes in any of the functional balance measures, FES-I or FRAT, between baseline and the end of the intervention period.
Community-dwelling older adults who joined an exercise intervention (FaME) aimed at increasing MVPA did not fall more during the intervention period, fell less and had fewer injurious falls in the 12 months after cessation of the intervention. However, 24 months after cessation of exercise, the beneficial effects of FaME on falls reduction ceased, except in those who maintained higher levels of MVPA. OEP exercise appears less effective at reducing falls in this functionally more able population of older adults.
跌倒在英国老年人群中很常见,给国民保健服务体系(NHS)带来的相关成本很高。系统评价表明,以逐步挑战平衡和增强力量为重点的家庭锻炼和基于小组的锻炼干预措施,可使有跌倒史的人群中跌倒发生率降低多达42%。对于目前跌倒风险较低的老年人,证据尚不明确。
ProAct65+是一项大型的整群随机对照试验,研究了家庭锻炼计划(奥塔哥锻炼计划(OEP))和基于小组的锻炼计划(跌倒管理锻炼(FaME))与常规护理(UC)相比,在增加中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)方面的有效性。本文研究该试验的次要结果;这些干预措施在减少跌倒及跌倒相关伤害方面的有效性。
通过两个地点(伦敦和诺丁汉)的全科医生诊所招募了1256名社区居住的老年人(年龄≥65岁)。排除频繁跌倒者(过去一年中跌倒≥3次)以及患有不稳定疾病的人,以及那些已经达到英国政府推荐的健康身体活动(PA)水平的人。
在随机分组前进行基线评估(包括健康、功能和既往跌倒情况评估);干预期持续24周,干预后立即进行评估;参与者每六个月随访一次,共随访24个月。使用负二项式模型分析跌倒数据。
在干预期内,通过每4周的日记前瞻性收集跌倒数据(共6次)。在总共24个月的每3个月随访中记录跌倒回忆情况。在基线和干预期结束时,使用定时起立行走测试和功能性伸展测试测量平衡能力。在基线以及所有后续评估点,通过问卷调查测量平衡信心(CONFbal)、跌倒风险(FRAT)和跌倒自我效能感(FES-I)。
294名参与者(24%)报告上一年有一两次跌倒。与常规护理相比,在干预期内两个锻炼组的跌倒情况均未增加(因暴露于风险增加所致)。与常规护理相比,FaME组的伤害性跌倒显著减少(发病率比(IRR)0.55,95%置信区间0.31,0.96;p=0.04),并且在干预结束后的12个月内持续减少(IRR 0.73,95%置信区间0.54,0.99;p=0.05)。与常规护理相比,在干预停止后的12个月内,FaME组所有跌倒(伤害性和非伤害性)的发生率也显著降低(IRR 0.74,95%置信区间0.55,0.99;p=0.04)。与常规护理相比,在干预停止后的12个月内,OEP组所有跌倒的发生率有非显著降低(IRR 0.76,95%置信区间0.53,1.09;p=0.14)。在24个月评估时,两个锻炼组对跌倒的影响均未持续存在。然而,将干预后第二年每周继续达到150分钟MVPA的FaME组参与者与未保持身体活动的FaME组参与者进行比较时,跌倒发生率显著降低(IRR=0.49,95%置信区间0.30,0.79;p=0.004)。与常规护理相比,两个干预组在干预后12个月时CONFbal均有显著改善。在基线和干预期结束之间,任何功能性平衡测量、FES-I或FRAT均无显著变化。
参加旨在增加MVPA的锻炼干预(FaME)的社区居住老年人在干预期内跌倒次数没有增加,在干预停止后的12个月内跌倒次数减少,伤害性跌倒也更少。然而,在停止锻炼24个月后,FaME对减少跌倒的有益效果消失,除非那些保持较高MVPA水平的人。在这个功能上更有能力的老年人群中,OEP锻炼在减少跌倒方面似乎效果较差。