Park Jong-Kyoung, Kim Hae-Young, Kim Woong-Chul, Kim Ji-Hwan
Doctoral student, Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Associate Professor, Department of Public Health Science, Graduate school, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Dec;116(6):909-915. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.024. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
Fit is an important factor influencing the success or failure of restorations. Recently, there has been increasing use of a newly developed pre-sintered soft alloy for use in computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) of cobalt-chromium alloys for the fabrication of metal ceramic restorations. However, almost no studies are available on the fit of restorations fabricated in this way.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the fit of metal coping fabricated from a newly developed CAD-CAM soft alloy in order to investigate its clinical applicability.
Metal coping was categorized as casting alloy (CA), fully sintered hard alloy (FHA), or pre-sintered soft alloy (PSA) depending on the material, and 10 specimens of each category were fabricated. Seven measurement locations were selected in both the mesiodistal and labiolingual directions. For measurement of the marginal and internal discrepancies, silicone molds produced using a silicone replica technique were divided into mesiodistal and labiolingual cross-sections, and the width was measured. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test were performed (corrected α error level=.05/3).
The mean values of the total discrepancy were smallest in the CA group (52.53 ±33.40 μm) and largest in the FHA group (87.84 ±39.43 μm). The CA group and the PSA group were not significantly different from each other (P>.05) but were statistically significantly different from the FHA group (P<.001). In particular, the absolute marginal discrepancy did not differ significantly between the CA (33.68 ±8.44 μm) and PSA groups (37.01 ±8.04 μm) (P>.05).
The fit of the PSA restorations determined by this study was similar to that of conventional cast restorations. Both FHA and PSA restorations demonstrated clinically acceptable values (<120 μm).
适合性是影响修复体成败的一个重要因素。最近,一种新开发的预烧结软合金越来越多地用于钴铬合金的计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM),以制作金属陶瓷修复体。然而,几乎没有关于以此方式制作的修复体适合性的研究。
本体外研究的目的是评估由新开发的CAD-CAM软合金制成的金属基底冠的适合性,以研究其临床适用性。
根据材料将金属基底冠分为铸造合金(CA)、完全烧结硬合金(FHA)或预烧结软合金(PSA),每组制作10个样本。在近远中方向和唇舌方向均选择7个测量位置。为测量边缘和内部差异,使用硅橡胶复制技术制作的硅橡胶模具被切成近远中横截面和唇舌横截面,并测量宽度。进行Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney U检验(校正α错误水平 = 0.05/3)。
总差异的平均值在CA组最小(52.53±33.40μm),在FHA组最大(87.84±39.43μm)。CA组和PSA组之间无显著差异(P>0.05),但与FHA组有统计学显著差异(P<0.001)。特别是,CA组(33.68±8.44μm)和PSA组(37.01±8.04μm)之间的绝对边缘差异无显著差异(P>0.05)。
本研究确定的PSA修复体的适合性与传统铸造修复体相似。FHA和PSA修复体均显示出临床可接受的值(<120μm)。