Suppr超能文献

随机、前瞻性的初步比较三种心耳消除技术:内部结扎、缝合切除和外科切除。

A randomized, prospective pilot comparison of 3 atrial appendage elimination techniques: Internal ligation, stapled excision, and surgical excision.

机构信息

Center for Comprehensive Cardiovascular Care, Saint Louis University, St Louis, Mo.

Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Oct;152(4):1075-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Elimination of the left atrial appendage (LAA) attempts to reduce stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). A retrospective review suggests that various surgical techniques are often unsuccessful and may leave a stump or gap. In a pilot study, we prospectively evaluated 3 surgical techniques with long-term follow up to define effectiveness.

METHODS

At a single institution, 28 patients undergoing concomitant AF surgery were randomized prospectively into 1 of 3 techniques of LAA elimination: internal suture ligation (IL), external stapled excision (StEx), and surgical excision (SxEx). The success of LAA elimination was assessed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in all patients at the time of surgery. Failure of LAA closure consisted of either a stump (residual appendage tissue >1 cm in maximum length) or a gap (persistent flow between the left atrium [LA] and the LAA). Failure was treated intraoperatively when recognized. Late follow-up was obtained using a TEE at a mean of 0.4 years in 21/28 (75%) of patients.

RESULTS

Early failure was recognized and treated in 1 patient in the IL group (13%), 6 patients in the StEx group (60%), and 2 patients in the SxEx group (20%) (P = .06). On follow-up TEE, 4 of 7 patients in the IL group (57%) had developed gaps, 3 of whom (43%) with greater than mild flow. No patients in the StEx or SxEx groups had a gap (P = .03). In late follow-up, 1 of 7 patients in the IL group (14%) had a stump, compared with 2 of 8 (25%) in the StEx group and 3 of 6 (50%) in the SxEx group (P = .35). The overall failure rate was 57%: 5 of 8 (63%) in the IL group, 6 of 10 (60%) in the StEx group, and 5 of 10 (50%) in the SxEx group (P = .85). No patient had a stroke at any time during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

LAA elimination is often incomplete and goes undetected. If the LAA is eliminated at the time of surgery, then TEE should be used intraoperatively to assess effectiveness and reintervention performed if warranted. Late assessment for completeness of closure should be considered before cessation of anticoagulation until more effective LAA techniques can be developed.

摘要

背景

消除左心耳(LAA)尝试减少心房颤动(AF)患者的中风。一项回顾性研究表明,各种手术技术往往不成功,可能会留下残端或间隙。在一项试点研究中,我们前瞻性地评估了 3 种具有长期随访的手术技术,以确定其有效性。

方法

在一家机构中,28 名接受 AF 手术的患者被前瞻性随机分为 3 种 LAA 消除技术之一:内部缝合结扎(IL)、外部缝合切除(StEx)和手术切除(SxEx)。所有患者均在手术时通过经食管超声心动图(TEE)评估 LAA 消除的效果。LAA 闭合失败包括残端(最大长度超过 1 厘米的残余心耳组织)或间隙(左心房 [LA] 和 LAA 之间持续血流)。术中发现失败时进行治疗。28 名患者中有 21 名(75%)在术后平均 0.4 年时通过 TEE 进行了晚期随访。

结果

IL 组 1 名患者(13%)、StEx 组 6 名患者(60%)和 SxEx 组 2 名患者(20%)早期发现并治疗失败(P=0.06)。在 TEE 随访中,IL 组 7 名患者中有 4 名(57%)出现间隙,其中 3 名(43%)存在中度以上血流。StEx 组和 SxEx 组均无患者出现间隙(P=0.03)。在晚期随访中,IL 组 7 名患者中有 1 名(14%)有残端,而 StEx 组 8 名患者中有 2 名(25%),SxEx 组 6 名患者中有 3 名(50%)(P=0.35)。总的失败率为 57%:IL 组 5 例(63%),StEx 组 6 例(60%),SxEx 组 5 例(50%)(P=0.85)。在随访期间,没有患者发生任何时间的中风。

结论

LAA 消除往往不彻底且未被发现。如果在手术时消除 LAA,则应在术中使用 TEE 评估效果,如果需要,应进行再次干预。在停止抗凝治疗之前,应考虑在完全闭合之前进行晚期评估,直到可以开发出更有效的 LAA 技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验