Physense, BCN Medtech, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08018 Barcelona, Spain.
IHU Liryc, CHU Bordeaux, Université Bordeaux, Inserm, Pessac, France.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Sep 26;20(9):e1011546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011546. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Left atrial appendage occlusion devices (LAAO) are a feasible alternative for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high risk of thromboembolic stroke and contraindication to antithrombotic therapies. However, optimal LAAO device configurations (i.e., size, type, location) remain unstandardized due to the large anatomical variability of the left atrial appendage (LAA) morphology, leading to a 4-6% incidence of device-related thrombus (DRT). In-silico simulations have the potential to assess DRT risk and identify the key factors, such as suboptimal device positioning. This work presents fluid simulation results computed on 20 patient-specific left atrial geometries, analysing different commercially available LAAO occluders, including plug-type and pacifier-type devices. In addition, we explored two distinct device positions: 1) the real post-LAAO intervention configuration derived from follow-up imaging; and 2) one covering the pulmonary ridge if it was not achieved during the implantation (13 out of 20). In total, 33 different configurations were analysed. In-silico indices indicating high risk of DRT (e.g., low blood flow velocities and flow complexity around the device) were combined with particle deposition analysis based on a discrete phase model. The obtained results revealed that covering the pulmonary ridge with the LAAO device may be one of the key factors to prevent DRT, resulting in higher velocities and reduced flow recirculations (e.g., mean velocities of 0.183 ± 0.12 m/s and 0.236 ± 0.16 m/s for uncovered versus covered positions in DRT patients). Moreover, disk-based devices exhibited enhanced adaptability to various LAA morphologies and, generally, demonstrated a lower risk of abnormal events after LAAO implantation.
左心耳封堵装置(LAAO)是一种可行的选择,适用于有高血栓栓塞性中风风险和抗血栓治疗禁忌的非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)患者。然而,由于左心耳(LAA)形态的解剖学变异性很大,导致设备相关血栓(DRT)的发生率为 4-6%,因此最佳的 LAAO 设备配置(即大小、类型、位置)仍然没有标准化。基于计算机的模拟具有评估 DRT 风险和确定关键因素的潜力,例如设备定位不当。这项工作展示了对 20 个患者特定左心房几何形状进行的流体模拟结果,分析了不同的商业可用 LAAO 封堵器,包括塞型和奶嘴型装置。此外,我们还探索了两种不同的设备位置:1)来自随访成像的真实 LAAO 干预后的配置;2)如果在植入过程中无法实现,则覆盖肺嵴(20 个中的 13 个)。总共分析了 33 种不同的配置。与基于离散相模型的粒子沉积分析相结合,将指示 DRT 高风险的计算指标(例如设备周围血流速度低和流态复杂)。获得的结果表明,用 LAAO 装置覆盖肺嵴可能是预防 DRT 的关键因素之一,这会导致速度更高,血流再循环减少(例如,在有 DRT 的患者中,未覆盖与覆盖位置的平均速度分别为 0.183±0.12m/s 和 0.236±0.16m/s)。此外,盘型装置对各种 LAA 形态具有更好的适应性,并且通常在 LAAO 植入后发生异常事件的风险较低。