Stull Mamie C, Clemens Michael S, Heafner Thomas A, Watson John Devin B, Arthurs Zachary M, Propper Brandon W
San Antonio Military Medical Center, Sam Houston, TX; Clinical Research Division, 59th Medical Wing, Joint Base San Antonio - Lackland, Sam Houston, TX.
San Antonio Military Medical Center, Sam Houston, TX; Clinical Research Division, 59th Medical Wing, Joint Base San Antonio - Lackland, Sam Houston, TX.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Oct;36:265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.05.089. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
In the setting of vascular injury, vein interposition graft is the preferred conduit, but may have limited availability. This study seeks to develop a large animal model assessing the graft performance of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and Dacron in the setting of a polymicrobial infection.
Thirty-seven animals were placed into 4 groups for a 21-day survival period. Six-millimeter PTFE or Dacron interposition grafts were placed in the right iliac artery with a standardized bacterial inoculation. Native vessel with and without contamination served as control groups. The inoculant was 1 × 10 of genetically labeled Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. The primary end points were graft patency (determined by duplex ultrasound and necropsy) and graft infection (culture with molecular analysis). Secondary end points included physiological measurements, blood cultures, laboratory data, and histopathology.
PTFE and Dacron had similar infection rates of 85.7% and 75%, respectively. There was no significant difference in infectious organisms between graft materials. PTFE and Dacron exhibited bacterial ingrowth and transmigration to the intraluminal portion of the conduit. Forty-five percent of the Dacron group and 40% of the PTFE group remained patent at postoperative day 21 (P = 0.98). Clinical data, including white blood cell count, percent neutrophils, and lactate, did not vary significantly between groups.
PTFE and Dacron perform similarly in terms of infection rates and graft failure as both have a propensity toward bacterial ingrowth and occlusion when compared with controls. This is a valid animal model to assess graft performance in the setting of polymicrobial infection and provides an avenue for studying novel prosthetic conduits.
在血管损伤的情况下,静脉移植是首选的管道,但可用性可能有限。本研究旨在建立一种大型动物模型,以评估聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)和涤纶在多微生物感染情况下的移植性能。
37只动物被分为4组,为期21天的生存期。将6毫米的PTFE或涤纶移植管置于右髂动脉,并进行标准化的细菌接种。有污染和无污染的天然血管作为对照组。接种物为1×10的基因标记铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌。主要终点是移植管通畅情况(通过双功超声和尸检确定)和移植管感染(分子分析培养)。次要终点包括生理测量、血培养、实验室数据和组织病理学。
PTFE和涤纶的感染率分别为85.7%和75%,相似。移植材料之间的感染微生物没有显著差异。PTFE和涤纶均表现出细菌向内生长并迁移至管道腔内部分。在术后第21天,涤纶组45%和PTFE组40%的移植管仍保持通畅(P = 0.98)。各实验组间临床数据,包括白细胞计数、中性粒细胞百分比和乳酸水平,差异均无统计学意义。
PTFE和涤纶在感染率和移植失败方面表现相似,因为与对照组相比,两者都有细菌向内生长和堵塞的倾向。这是一种评估多微生物感染情况下移植性能的有效动物模型,并为研究新型人工血管提供了途径。