Suppr超能文献

对一种用于副鸡禽杆菌血清分型的分子方法的评估。

Evaluation of a proposed molecular methodology for the serotyping of Avibacterium paragallinarum.

作者信息

Wang Hongjun, Sun Huiling, Blackall Patrick J, Zhang Zhenhua, Zhou Hongzhuan, Xu Fuzhou, Chen Xiaoling

机构信息

Beijing Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases in Livestock and Poultry, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Beijing Municipal Academy of Agriculture and Forestry, Beijing, China (Wang, Sun, Zhang, Zhou, Xu, Chen)Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia (Blackall).

Beijing Key Laboratory for Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases in Livestock and Poultry, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Beijing Municipal Academy of Agriculture and Forestry, Beijing, China (Wang, Sun, Zhang, Zhou, Xu, Chen)Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia (Blackall)

出版信息

J Vet Diagn Invest. 2016 Sep;28(5):555-60. doi: 10.1177/1040638716659523. Epub 2016 Jul 16.

Abstract

A multiplex (m)PCR and a PCR followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of Avibacterium paragallinarum have been proposed as alternatives to conventional serotyping by the Page scheme. We evaluated both methods, and also sequenced the PCR-RFLP target fragment to reexamine the capacity of molecular serotyping. Eleven reference strains and 27 field isolates were used. Many reference strains and isolates were misidentified as Page serogroup B. The sequence analysis revealed 6 profiles based on the matching rates of the target sequence with the 3 reverse primers of the mPCR. The reference strains and field isolates in profiles 1 and 4 were correctly identified as serogroup A or C by the mPCR. The strains and/or isolates in profiles 2, 3, 5, and 6 could be misidentified as serogroup B or as nontypeable by the mPCR. The homology comparison of the sequences showed that the target sequence of the mPCR, called region 2, was not Page serogroup specific, although some Kume serovars, such as A-1 and C-2, were correctly serotyped. In addition, there was a 9 nucleotide deletion in the sequences of profiles 1, 3, and 5, but not of profiles 2, 4, and 6. Overall, we confirmed that the mPCR and PCR-RFLP molecular assays are not suitable for identifying the serogroups of A. paragallinarum isolates. With further study, analysis of region 2 sequences may have potential as a means of recognizing the Kume serovars of A. paragallinarum isolates.

摘要

有人提出,多重(m)PCR以及对副鸡禽杆菌进行PCR后限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)分析,可作为Page分型法传统血清分型的替代方法。我们对这两种方法进行了评估,还对PCR-RFLP目标片段进行了测序,以重新审视分子血清分型的能力。使用了11株参考菌株和27株现场分离株。许多参考菌株和分离株被误鉴定为Page血清群B。序列分析基于目标序列与mPCR的3条反向引物的匹配率揭示了6种图谱。图谱1和4中的参考菌株和现场分离株通过mPCR被正确鉴定为血清群A或C。图谱2、3、5和6中的菌株和/或分离株可能会被mPCR误鉴定为血清群B或不可分型。序列的同源性比较表明,尽管一些久米血清型,如A-1和C-2,被正确血清分型,但mPCR的目标序列(称为区域2)并非Page血清群特异性。此外,图谱1、3和5的序列中有9个核苷酸缺失,而图谱2、4和6中没有。总体而言,我们证实mPCR和PCR-RFLP分子检测方法不适用于鉴定副鸡禽杆菌分离株的血清群。随着进一步研究,区域2序列分析可能有潜力作为识别副鸡禽杆菌分离株久米血清型的一种手段。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验