• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

维持性血液透析的终末期肾病患者中透析器传统一次性使用与机械复用的总直接成本比较:一项单中心研究。

Comparison of total direct cost of conventional single use and mechanical reuse of dialyzers in patients of end-stage renal disease on maintenance hemodialysis: A single center study.

作者信息

Qureshi Ruqaya, Dhrolia Murtaza F, Nasir Kiran, Imtiaz Salman, Ahmad Aasim

机构信息

The Kidney Centre Post Graduate Training Institute, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2016 Jul-Aug;27(4):774-80. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.185242.

DOI:10.4103/1319-2442.185242
PMID:27424697
Abstract

Reusing dialyzers is almost universal in developing countries to reduce the cost of hemodialysis (HD). Economic benefits of dialyzer reuse, when estimated only on the basis of the dialyzer and its consumables are very significant and attractive. In this study, we compared the cost of mechanical reuse of dialyzer considering all of the direct costs (medications, dialyzer, and its consumables, disinfection fluid, and hospitalization if any) in HD treatment, which if significantly different between single use and reuse, can nullify the obvious cost benefits. A total of 70 adult patients of any gender on maintenance HD at The Kidney Centre Post Graduate Training Institute for more than three months were included. Equal numbers of patients were on single use (Group A) and reuse of dialyzer (Group B). Both groups were compared for total direct costs of HD over a six months period. Average six monthly total direct cost per patient of Group A was significantly high as compared to Group B, the United States Dollar (USD) 1750.67 ± 135.31$ vs. USD 1488.50 ± 132.23$); difference USD 262.18$ (P <0.001). The total cost saving being 14.97% in Group B. Our study shows that dialyzer reuse provides a significant economic benefit and remains a means of reducing the cost of HD.

摘要

在发展中国家,为降低血液透析(HD)成本,复用透析器几乎很普遍。仅基于透析器及其耗材估算的透析器复用经济效益非常显著且有吸引力。在本研究中,我们比较了血液透析治疗中考虑所有直接成本(药物、透析器及其耗材、消毒液以及如有住院费用)的透析器机械复用成本,若单次使用和复用之间存在显著差异,可能会抵消明显的成本效益。纳入了肾脏中心研究生培训学院70名维持性血液透析超过三个月的成年患者,男女不限。单次使用组(A组)和透析器复用组(B组)患者数量相等。比较了两组在六个月期间血液透析的总直接成本。A组患者平均六个月的总直接成本显著高于B组,分别为1750.67美元±135.31美元和1488.50美元±132.23美元;差值为262.18美元(P<0.001)。B组的总成本节约为14.97%。我们的研究表明,透析器复用提供了显著的经济效益,仍然是降低血液透析成本的一种方式。

相似文献

1
Comparison of total direct cost of conventional single use and mechanical reuse of dialyzers in patients of end-stage renal disease on maintenance hemodialysis: A single center study.维持性血液透析的终末期肾病患者中透析器传统一次性使用与机械复用的总直接成本比较:一项单中心研究。
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2016 Jul-Aug;27(4):774-80. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.185242.
2
A quality and cost-benefit analysis of dialyzer reuse in hemodialysis patients.血液透析患者透析器复用的质量与成本效益分析
Ren Fail. 2008;30(5):521-6. doi: 10.1080/08860220802064747.
3
Dialyzer reuse--part II: advantages and disadvantages.透析器复用——第二部分:优点与缺点
Semin Dial. 2006 May-Jun;19(3):217-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2006.00158.x.
4
The technology of dialyzer reuse.透析器复用技术。
Semin Nephrol. 1997 Jul;17(4):321-30.
5
To reuse or not to reuse? An economic evaluation of hemodialyzer reuse versus conventional single-use hemodialysis for chronic hemodialysis patients.复用还是不复用?慢性血液透析患者血液透析器复用与传统一次性使用血液透析的经济学评估。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002 Winter;18(1):81-93.
6
Hemodialyzer Reuse and Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections.血液透析器复用与革兰氏阴性菌血流感染
Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Jun;69(6):726-733. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.09.022. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
7
Association of dialyzer reuse and hospitalization rates among hemodialysis patients in the US.美国血液透析患者中透析器复用与住院率的关联。
Am J Nephrol. 1999;19(6):641-8. doi: 10.1159/000013535.
8
Influence of erythropoietin treatment on dialyzer reuse.促红细胞生成素治疗对透析器复用的影响。
Blood Purif. 1997;15(2):77-83. doi: 10.1159/000170319.
9
Clinical and microbiological effects of dialyzers reuse in hemodialysis patients.透析器复用对血液透析患者的临床及微生物学影响。
J Bras Nefrol. 2019 Jul-Sep;41(3):384-392. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2018-0151. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
10
Association of dialyzer reuse with hospitalization and survival rates among U.S. hemodialysis patients: do comorbidities matter?美国血液透析患者中透析器复用与住院率及生存率的关联:合并症有影响吗?
J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Mar;52(3):209-17. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00162-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Dialyzer reuse: is it safe and worth it?透析器复用:它安全且值得吗?
J Bras Nefrol. 2019 Sep 2;41(3):312-314. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2019-0134.
2
Correlation of serum levels of fibroblast growth factor 23 and Klotho protein levels with bone mineral density in maintenance hemodialysis patients.维持性血液透析患者血清成纤维细胞生长因子 23 和 Klotho 蛋白水平与骨密度的相关性。
Eur J Med Res. 2018 Apr 17;23(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40001-018-0315-z.