反应力量指数及其与身体和运动表现指标的关联:一项荟萃分析的系统评价

Reactive Strength Index and its Associations with Measures of Physical and Sports Performance: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Jarvis Paul, Turner Anthony, Read Paul, Bishop Chris

机构信息

Faculty of Science and Technology, London Sport Institute, Middlesex University, London, UK.

Institute of Sport, Exercise and Health, London, UK.

出版信息

Sports Med. 2022 Feb;52(2):301-330. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01566-y. Epub 2021 Oct 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reactive strength index (RSI) is used frequently in the testing and monitoring of athletes. Associations with sports performance measures may vary dependent on the task but a literature synthesis has not been performed.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this meta-analysis was to examine associations between RSI measured during rebound jumping tasks and measures of strength, linear and change of direction speed, and endurance performance.

METHODS

A systematic literature search with meta-analysis was conducted using databases PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, and Ovid. Inclusion criteria required studies to (1) examine the relationship between RSI and an independent measure of physical or sporting performance for at least one variable; and (2) provide rebound test instructions to minimise ground contact time and maximise displacement of the jump. Methodological quality was assessed using a modified version of the Downs and Black Quality Index tool. Heterogeneity was examined via the Q statistic and I. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using a random-effects model, with Egger's regression test used to assess small study bias (inclusive of publication bias).

RESULTS

Of the 1320 citations reviewed, a total of 32 studies were included in this meta-analysis. RSI was significantly and moderately associated with strength (isometric: r = 0.356 [95% CI 0.209-0.504]; isotonic: r = 0.365 [0.075-0.654]; pooled strength measures: r = 0.339 [0.209-0.469]) and endurance performance (r = 0.401 [0.173-0.629]). Significant moderate and negative associations were indicated for acceleration (r = - 0.426 [- 0.562 to - 0.290]), top speed (r = - 0.326 [- 0.502 to - 0.151]), and significant large negative associations were noted for change of direction speed (r = - 0.565 [- 0.726 to - 0.404]). Heterogeneity was trivial to moderate across all measures (I = 0-66%), and significant for isotonic strength and change of direction speed (p < 0.1). Evidence of small study bias was apparent for both acceleration and change of direction speed (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified primarily moderate associations between RSI and independent measures of physical and sporting performance, and the strength of these relationships varied based on the task and physical quality assessed. The findings from this meta-analysis can help practitioners to develop more targeted testing and monitoring processes. Future research may wish to examine if associations are stronger in tasks that display greater specificity.

摘要

背景

反应力量指数(RSI)常用于运动员的测试和监测。与运动表现指标的关联可能因任务而异,但尚未进行文献综合分析。

目的

本荟萃分析的目的是研究在反弹跳跃任务中测量的RSI与力量、直线和变向速度以及耐力表现指标之间的关联。

方法

使用PubMed、SPORTDiscus、Web of Science和Ovid数据库进行了系统的文献检索和荟萃分析。纳入标准要求研究(1)至少针对一个变量检验RSI与身体或运动表现的独立测量指标之间的关系;(2)提供反弹测试说明,以尽量减少地面接触时间并最大化跳跃位移。使用Downs和Black质量指数工具的修改版评估方法学质量。通过Q统计量和I2检验异质性。使用随机效应模型计算合并效应量,并用Egger回归检验评估小研究偏倚(包括发表偏倚)。

结果

在审查的1320篇文献中,本荟萃分析共纳入32项研究。RSI与力量(等长收缩:r = 0.356 [95% CI 0.209 - 0.504];等张收缩:r = 0.365 [0.075 - 0.654];合并力量测量指标:r = 0.339 [0.209 - 0.469])和耐力表现(r = 0.401 [0.173 - 0.629])显著且中等程度相关。加速度(r = - 0.426 [- 0.562至 - 0.290])和最高速度(r = - 0.326 [- 0.502至 - 0.151])显示出显著的中等程度负相关,变向速度(r = - 0.565 [- 0.726至 - 0.404])显示出显著的高度负相关。所有测量指标的异质性为轻微至中等(I2 = 0 - 66%),等张力量和变向速度的异质性显著(p < 0.1)。加速度和变向速度均有明显的小研究偏倚证据(p < 0.05)。

结论

我们主要确定了RSI与身体和运动表现的独立测量指标之间的中等程度关联,这些关系的强度因所评估的任务和身体素质而异。本荟萃分析的结果可帮助从业者制定更具针对性的测试和监测流程。未来的研究不妨检验在显示出更高特异性的任务中关联是否更强。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索