Suppr超能文献

上身姿势和姿势控制的标准值:一项研究方案。

Standard values of the upper body posture and postural control: a study protocol.

作者信息

Ohlendorf Daniela, Mickel Christoph, Filmann Natalie, Wanke Eileen M, Groneberg David A

机构信息

Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9A, Frankfurt/Main, 60590 Germany.

Institute of Sport Sciences, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Ginnheimer Landstraße 39, Frankfurt/Main, 60487 Germany.

出版信息

J Occup Med Toxicol. 2016 Jul 16;11:34. doi: 10.1186/s12995-016-0122-9. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decisions on orthopedic interventions on upper body posture and its control have usually resulted from comparisons with the healthy state. Therefore, practitioners as well as scientists in human movement science or orthopedics need access to such kind of data which are patient-centered and well measured. Until now, these data have been missing concerning upper body posture as well as postural control and their control. That is why the aim of the current project is to measure these data with healthy participants across the lifespan.

RESULTS

For standard value determination tolerance range and confidence intervals will be calculated. In addition, Pearson- or Spearman-Rank correlations will be used as well as two-sample-t-tests or Mann-Whitney-U-tests for specific group differences. All tests will be two-sided with the level of significance of 5 %.

DISCUSSION

This project aims at improving classifications in adaptations of upper body posture and postural control. Measured standard values have not been determined before to this extent. Therefore, interventional effects may become better quantifiable and justiciable.

摘要

背景

关于上半身姿势及其控制的骨科干预决策通常是通过与健康状态进行比较得出的。因此,人类运动科学或骨科领域的从业者以及科学家需要获取这类以患者为中心且测量良好的数据。到目前为止,关于上半身姿势、姿势控制及其调节方面的数据一直缺失。这就是当前项目的目的是在整个生命周期内对健康参与者进行这些数据测量的原因。

结果

为确定标准值,将计算公差范围和置信区间。此外,将使用皮尔逊或斯皮尔曼等级相关性,以及针对特定组间差异的双样本t检验或曼-惠特尼U检验。所有检验均为双侧检验,显著性水平为5%。

讨论

本项目旨在改进对上半身姿势和姿势控制适应性的分类。此前尚未在如此程度上确定测量的标准值。因此,干预效果可能会变得更易于量化和论证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0947/4947251/8c14217d5186/12995_2016_122_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验