Lynch D J, Schaffer K
Department of Family Medicine Medical College of Ohio Toledo.
Behav Med. 1989 Summer;15(2):72-4. doi: 10.1080/08964289.1989.9935154.
This investigation tested Matthews's hypothesis, which proposed that reduced social support may be one of the mediators of susceptibility to coronary disease in Type A individuals. In addition, sex differences were hypothesized to be an important aspect of the findings. Subjects were 72 women and 57 men undergraduate students who completed the Jenkins Activity Survey (JAS) and the Sarason Social Support Questionnaire. For women, both the Type A and Speed and Impatience subscales of the JAS were negatively related to satisfaction with social support. For men, however, Type A scores on JAS were positively correlated with satisfaction with social support. The implications of these findings, particularly with regard to the importance of separate analyses by sex, are discussed.
本研究检验了马修斯的假设,该假设提出社会支持减少可能是A型人格个体易患冠心病的中介因素之一。此外,研究假设性别差异是研究结果的一个重要方面。研究对象为72名女性和57名男性本科生,他们完成了詹金斯活动调查(JAS)和萨拉森社会支持问卷。对于女性而言,JAS中的A型以及速度与不耐烦分量表均与社会支持满意度呈负相关。然而,对于男性来说,JAS中的A型得分与社会支持满意度呈正相关。本文讨论了这些研究结果的意义,尤其是关于按性别进行单独分析的重要性。