Heilbrun A B, Palchanis N, Friedberg E
J Pers Assess. 1986 Winter;50(4):525-39. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5004_1.
Self-report measures of Type A personality receive wide research usage despite mounting evidence that they are poor predictors of coronary heart disease. It was proposed that the limited prediction results in part from the failure to restrict measurement to only those Type A characteristics that are demonstrably related to excessive stress. The first study in this article reports a factor analysis of all items on the Jenkins Activity Survey (JAS), the most popular Type A questionnaire, along with 25 stress symptoms. Self-ratings were obtained from both male and female college students. Only one stress-related factor emerged including 12 JAS items out of 44. These were relevant to (a) hard-driving and competitive, (b) time-urgent, and (c) hostile/irritated characteristics. Study 2 reports correlations of +.50 and +.43 between the stress-relevant JAS items and stress for new samples of female and male college students. Study 3 considers the broader personality correlates of scores on the stress-relevant Type A items and reports markedly different patterns for male and female college students. Predicted correlations were found on new samples between these personality correlates, considered as scales, and stress-relevant Type A scores and stress.
尽管越来越多的证据表明,A型人格的自我报告测量方法并不能很好地预测冠心病,但它们在研究中仍被广泛使用。有人提出,预测能力有限部分是由于未能将测量仅局限于那些与过度压力明显相关的A型特征。本文的第一项研究报告了对詹金斯活动调查(JAS)(最流行的A型问卷)所有项目以及25种压力症状进行的因素分析。从男女大学生中获取了自我评分。仅出现了一个与压力相关的因素,包括44项JAS项目中的12项。这些项目与(a)积极进取和竞争、(b)时间紧迫以及(c)敌意/易怒特征相关。研究2报告了在新的男女大学生样本中,与压力相关的JAS项目与压力之间的相关性分别为+.50和+.43。研究3考虑了与压力相关的A型项目得分更广泛的人格相关性,并报告了男女大学生明显不同的模式。在新样本中发现了这些被视为量表的人格相关性与与压力相关的A型得分和压力之间的预测相关性。