Thorsen Olav, Hartveit Miriam, Johannessen Jan Olav, Fosse Lars, Eide Geir Egil, Schulz Jörn, Bærheim Anders
Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Box 7800, Bergen, N-5020, Norway.
Department of Research, Stavanger University Hospital, Box 8100, Stavanger, N-4068, Norway.
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jul 18;17:76. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0495-y.
GPs' individual decisions to refer and the various ways of working when they refer are important determinants of secondary care use. The objective of this study was to explore and describe potential characteristics of GPs' referral practice by investigating their opinions about referring and their self-reported experiences of what they do when they refer.
Observational cross-sectional study using data from 128 Norwegian GPs who filled in a questionnaire with statements on how they regarded the referral process, and who were invited to collect data when they actually referred to hospital during one month. Only elective referrals were recorded. The 57 participants (44,5 %) recorded data from 691 referrals. The variables were included in a principal component analysis. A multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to identify typologies with GP's age, gender, specialty in family medicine and location as independent variables.
Eight principal components describe the different ways GPs think and work when they refer. Two typologies summarize these components: confidence characterizing specialists in family medicine, mainly female, who reported a more patient-centred practice making priority decisions when they refer, who confer easily with hospital consultants and who complete the referrals during the consultation; uncertainty characterizing young, mainly male non-specialists in family medicine, experiencing patients' pressure to be referred, heavy workload, having reluctance to cooperate with the patient and reporting sparse contact with hospital colleagues.
Training specialists in family medicine in patient-centred method, easy conference with hospital consultant and cooperation with patients while making the referral may foster both self-reflections on own competences and increased levels of confidence.
全科医生(GP)关于转诊的个人决定以及他们转诊时的各种工作方式是二级医疗服务使用的重要决定因素。本研究的目的是通过调查全科医生对转诊的看法以及他们自我报告的转诊时的经历,来探索和描述全科医生转诊实践的潜在特征。
采用观察性横断面研究,数据来自128名挪威全科医生,他们填写了一份关于他们对转诊过程看法的问卷,并被邀请在一个月内实际转诊至医院时收集数据。仅记录选择性转诊。57名参与者(44.5%)记录了691次转诊的数据。这些变量被纳入主成分分析。进行多元线性回归分析,以全科医生的年龄、性别、家庭医学专业和地点作为自变量来确定类型。
八个主成分描述了全科医生转诊时不同的思考和工作方式。两种类型总结了这些成分:自信型,主要为女性家庭医学专科医生,他们报告在转诊时以患者为中心的实践更为优先,容易与医院顾问协商,并在会诊期间完成转诊;不确定型,主要为年轻男性非家庭医学专科医生,他们感受到患者要求转诊的压力,工作量大,不愿与患者合作,且与医院同事的联系较少。
对家庭医学专科医生进行以患者为中心的方法培训、便于与医院顾问会诊以及在转诊时与患者合作,可能会促进他们对自身能力的自我反思并提高自信水平。