• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公民科学家:通过转化咨询委员会建立社区与学术机构的伙伴关系。

The citizen scientist: Community-academic partnerships through Translational Advisory Boards.

作者信息

Patel Darpan I, Winkler Paula, Botello Jorge, Villarreal Jocelin, Puga Frank

机构信息

Department of Health Restoration and Care Systems Management, School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA; Cancer Therapy and Research Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.

South Central Area Health Education Center, Center for South Texas Programs University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Dec;99(12):2087-2090. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.013
PMID:27432015
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the effectiveness of engaging patient partners as "citizen scientists" in the research process to boost patient centered outcomes research in underrepresented populations.

METHODS

Translational Advisory Boards in South Texas have effectively collaborated with University researchers to develop community-based patient centered research. Here we describe innovative approaches in research to engage patients and offer practical methods to enhance partnerships between patients and researchers to facilitate patient engagement.

RESULTS

Three health issues identified by the TABs were diabetes, obesity and teen pregnancy Examples of other community inspired research topics include air and water quality, methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus, intimate partner violence, chronic pain, and human papilloma virus and hepatitis C vaccinations.

CONCLUSION

Patient engagement of underrepresented populations is inverse to the vast disparities they experience. In order to adequately address our nation's deficits in providing equitable healthcare, we must fully integrate disparate partners into the research process. By engaging community champions, academic health centers can fully integrate meaningful interventions on topics of interest to the catchment area in which they serve.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

These lessons can be used in developing local and regional collaborations across the country to boost active participation of patient stakeholder in PCOR to reduce healthcare disparities and improve our healthcare systems.

摘要

目的

描述让患者伙伴作为“公民科学家”参与研究过程,以促进在代表性不足人群中开展以患者为中心的结果研究的有效性。

方法

南德克萨斯州的转化咨询委员会已有效地与大学研究人员合作,开展基于社区的以患者为中心的研究。在此,我们描述研究中让患者参与的创新方法,并提供增强患者与研究人员之间伙伴关系以促进患者参与的实用方法。

结果

咨询委员会确定的三个健康问题是糖尿病、肥胖症和青少年怀孕。其他受社区启发的研究主题示例包括空气和水质、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌、亲密伴侣暴力、慢性疼痛以及人乳头瘤病毒和丙型肝炎疫苗接种。

结论

代表性不足人群的患者参与度与他们所经历的巨大差异呈反比。为了充分解决我国在提供公平医疗保健方面的不足,我们必须将不同的伙伴充分纳入研究过程。通过让社区倡导者参与,学术健康中心可以将针对其服务集水区感兴趣主题的有意义干预措施充分整合进来。

实践意义

这些经验教训可用于在全国范围内开展地方和区域合作,以促进患者利益相关者积极参与以患者为中心的结果研究,减少医疗保健差距并改善我们的医疗系统。

相似文献

1
The citizen scientist: Community-academic partnerships through Translational Advisory Boards.公民科学家:通过转化咨询委员会建立社区与学术机构的伙伴关系。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Dec;99(12):2087-2090. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
2
Using community-based participatory research in patient-centered outcomes research to address health disparities in under-represented communities.在以患者为中心的结果研究中运用基于社区的参与性研究,以解决代表性不足社区的健康差异问题。
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Sep;4(5):515-23. doi: 10.2217/cer.15.31. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
3
Bridging the divide: building infrastructure to support community-academic partnerships and improve capacity to conduct patient-centered outcomes research.弥合差距:构建基础设施以支持社区 - 学术伙伴关系并提高开展以患者为中心的结局研究的能力。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Dec;7(4):773-782. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0487-z.
4
Lessons on Patient and Stakeholder Engagement Strategies for Pipeline to Proposal Awards.从管线到提案奖的患者和利益相关者参与策略的经验教训。
Ethn Dis. 2018 Sep 6;28(Suppl 2):303-310. doi: 10.18865/ed.28.S2.303. eCollection 2018.
5
A community translational research pilot grants program to facilitate community--academic partnerships: lessons from Colorado's clinical translational science awards.一项促进社区与学术机构合作的社区转化研究试点资助计划:来自科罗拉多州临床转化科学奖的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Fall;6(3):381-7. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0036.
6
Engagement practices that join scientific methods with community wisdom: designing a patient-centered, randomized control trial with a Pacific Islander community.将科学方法与社区智慧相结合的参与式实践:与太平洋岛民社区共同设计一项以患者为中心的随机对照试验。
Nurs Inq. 2017 Apr;24(2). doi: 10.1111/nin.12141. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
7
Helping Basic Scientists Engage With Community Partners to Enrich and Accelerate Translational Research.帮助基础科学家与社区合作伙伴合作,以丰富和加速转化研究。
Acad Med. 2017 Mar;92(3):374-379. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001200.
8
Using community-based participatory research as a guiding framework for health disparities research centers.将基于社区的参与性研究作为健康差异研究中心的指导框架。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2007 Summer;1(2):195-205. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2007.0007.
9
A Community Health Initiative: Evaluation and Early Lessons Learned.一项社区健康倡议:评估与早期经验教训
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016 Spring;10(1):89-101. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0011.
10
Colorado Immersion Training in Community Engagement: Because You Can't Study What You Don't Know.科罗拉多社区参与沉浸式培训:因为你无法研究你所不了解的事物。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2014 Spring;8(1):117-24. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2014.0006.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge translation platforms: Broker, intermediary or more? A scoping review of definitions, functions and characteristics.知识转化平台:中介、媒介还是更多?对定义、功能和特征的范围综述
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Sep 1;23(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01383-z.
2
Community advisory board members' perspectives on their contributions to a large multistate cluster RCT: a mixed methods study.社区咨询委员会成员对其在一项大型多州整群随机对照试验中的贡献的看法:一项混合方法研究
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Nov 23;8(1):e1. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.673. eCollection 2024.
3
The case for citizen science in public health policy and practice: a mixed methods study of policymaker and practitioner perspectives and experiences.
公民科学在公共卫生政策和实践中的应用:决策者和实践者观点与经验的混合方法研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 May 1;21(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00978-8.
4
A Scoping Review of Citizen Science Approaches in Chronic Disease Prevention.公民科学在慢性病预防中的应用:范围综述
Front Public Health. 2022 May 9;10:743348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.743348. eCollection 2022.
5
Peer- and community-led responses to HIV: A scoping review.同伴和社区主导的艾滋病应对措施:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):e0260555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260555. eCollection 2021.
6
A rapid realist review of patient engagement in patient-oriented research and health care system impacts: part one.以患者为导向的研究中患者参与及医疗保健系统影响的快速实证综述:第一部分。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 10;7(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00299-6.
7
Deconstruction of the discourse authority of scientists in Chinese online science communication: Investigation of citizen science communicators on Chinese knowledge sharing networks.解构中国网络科学传播中科学家的话语权威:中国知识共享网络中公民科学传播者的调查。
Public Underst Sci. 2021 Nov;30(8):993-1007. doi: 10.1177/09636625211005106. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
8
Participatory praxis as an imperative for health-related stigma research.参与式实践是与健康相关的污名研究的必要条件。
BMC Med. 2019 Feb 15;17(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1263-3.
9
Ready or not? Observations from a long-standing community engagement advisory board about investigator competencies for community-engaged research.准备好了吗?一个长期存在的社区参与咨询委员会对社区参与研究中研究者能力的观察。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Jun;2(3):129-134. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.21. Epub 2018 Sep 3.