Hasegawa Kazuhiro, Okamoto Masashi, Hatsushikano Shun, Shimoda Haruka, Ono Masatoshi, Watanabe Kei
Niigata Spine Surgery Center, 2-5-22 Nishi-machi, Niigata, 950-0165, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Niigata University Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Eur Spine J. 2016 Nov;25(11):3675-3686. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4702-2. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
To elucidate the normative values of whole body sagittal alignment and balance of a healthy population in the standing position; and to clarify the relationship among the alignment, balance, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and age.
Healthy Japanese adult volunteers [n = 126, mean age 39.4 years (20-69), M/F = 30/96] with no history of spinal disease were enrolled in a cross-sectional cohort study. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire was administered and subjects were scanned from the center of the acoustic meati (CAM) to the feet while standing on a force plate to determine the gravity line (GL), and the distance between CAM and GL (CAM-GL) was measured in the sagittal plane. Standard X-ray parameters were measured from the head to the lower extremities. ODI was compared among age groups stratified by decade. Correlations were investigated by simple linear regression analysis. Ideal lumbar lordosis was investigated using the least squares method.
The present study yielded normative values for whole standing sagittal alignment including head and lower extremities in a cohort of 126 healthy adult volunteers, comparable to previous reports and thus a formula for ideal lumbar lordosis was deduced: LL = 32.9 + 0.60 × PI - 0.23 × age. There was a tendency of positive correlation between McGregor slope, thoracic kyphosis, PT, and age. SVA, T1 pelvic angle, sacrofemoral angle, knee flexion angle, and ankle flexion angle, but not CAM-GL, increased with age, suggesting that the spinopelvic alignment changes with age, but standing whole body alignment is compensated for to preserve a horizontal gaze. ODI tended to increase from the 40s in the domain of pain intensity, personal care, traveling, and total score. ODI weakly, but significantly positively correlated with age and PI-LL.
Whole body standing alignment even in healthy subjects gradually deteriorates with age, but is compensated to preserve a horizontal gaze. HRQOL is also affected by aging and spinopelvic malalignment.
阐明健康人群站立位时全身矢状面排列和平衡的标准值;并阐明排列、平衡、健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)与年龄之间的关系。
将无脊柱疾病史的健康日本成年志愿者[n = 126,平均年龄39.4岁(20 - 69岁),男/女 = 30/96]纳入一项横断面队列研究。采用奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数(ODI)问卷进行评估,受试者站在测力板上时,从外耳道中点(CAM)至足部进行扫描以确定重力线(GL),并在矢状面测量CAM与GL之间的距离(CAM - GL)。测量从头部到下肢的标准X线参数。对按十年分层的年龄组进行ODI比较。通过简单线性回归分析研究相关性。采用最小二乘法研究理想腰椎前凸。
本研究得出了126名健康成年志愿者队列中包括头部和下肢的全站立矢状面排列的标准值,与先前报告相当,因此推导出理想腰椎前凸的公式:LL = 32.9 + 0.60×PI - 0.23×年龄。麦格雷戈斜率、胸椎后凸、PT与年龄之间存在正相关趋势。矢状面垂直轴(SVA)、T1骨盆角、骶股角、膝关节屈曲角和踝关节屈曲角随年龄增加,但CAM - GL未增加,这表明脊柱骨盆排列随年龄变化,但站立时全身排列得到补偿以保持水平注视。在疼痛强度、个人护理、出行及总分方面,ODI从40多岁开始有升高趋势。ODI与年龄及骨盆入射角(PI)-腰椎前凸(LL)呈弱但显著的正相关。
即使是健康受试者,全身站立排列也会随年龄逐渐恶化,但会得到补偿以保持水平注视。HRQOL也受衰老和脊柱骨盆排列不齐的影响。