• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮椎间孔镜减压术后脊柱骨盆矢状位参数与再次手术的相关性:一项配对病例对照研究

Association Between Spinopelvic Alignment and Reoperation Following Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression: A Matched Case-Control Study.

作者信息

Ge Yang, Wang Aobo, Song He, Fan Ning, Zang Lei

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2025 Mar 18;18:1351-1360. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S505372. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/JPR.S505372
PMID:40124537
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11929410/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression (PTED) is widely used for treating lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), yet predictors of reoperation remain unclear. This study aimed to explore the association between spinopelvic alignment and the reoperation following PTED.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A 1:2 matched case-control study was conducted, involving patients who underwent single-level PTED for LSS at our institution from May 2014 to August 2022. Cases comprised patients requiring reoperation after initial PTED, while controls were those without reoperation during the follow-up. Measured radiological parameters included pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), disc height (DH), Pfirrmann classification, and Modic changes (MCs). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine cut-off points.

RESULTS

76 cases and 152 controls were selected from 1967 enrolled patients. Both groups had an average age of 61 years, a male-to-female ratio of 43:33, and a mean BMI of 25.95 kg/m². No significant differences in baseline characteristics were found between groups. Multivariate analysis identified PT (OR = 1.061, P = 0.007), PI-LL (OR = 1.057, P = 0.021), and DH (OR = 1.194, P = 0.015) as independent risk factors for the reoperation. ROC analysis revealed PI-LL with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.662 at a cut-off of 12.95° (95% CI = 0.582-0.741), PT with an AUC of 0.685 at a cut-off of 21.98° (95% CI = 0.606-0.763), and DH with an AUC of 0.602 at a cut-off of 8.22° (95% CI = 0.521-0.683).

CONCLUSION

PI-LL ≥ 12.95°, PT ≥ 21.98°, and DH ≥ 8.22° are independent risk factors for reoperation following PTED.

摘要

目的

经皮椎间孔镜减压术(PTED)广泛应用于治疗腰椎管狭窄症(LSS),但再次手术的预测因素仍不明确。本研究旨在探讨矢状面骨盆对线与PTED术后再次手术之间的关联。

患者与方法

进行了一项1:2匹配的病例对照研究,纳入2014年5月至2022年8月在我院接受单节段PTED治疗LSS的患者。病例组为初次PTED术后需要再次手术的患者,对照组为随访期间未进行再次手术的患者。测量的影像学参数包括骨盆倾斜角(PT)、骨盆入射角(PI)、骶骨倾斜角(SS)、腰椎前凸角(LL)、骨盆入射角与腰椎前凸角的差值(PI-LL)、椎间盘高度(DH)、Pfirrmann分级和Modic改变(MCs)。进行单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析以确定预测因素。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线以确定截断点。

结果

从1967例登记患者中选取76例病例和152例对照。两组的平均年龄均为61岁,男女比例为43:33,平均体重指数为25.95kg/m²。两组间基线特征无显著差异。多因素分析确定PT(OR = 1.061,P = 0.007)、PI-LL(OR = 1.057,P = 0.021)和DH(OR = 1.194,P = 0.015)为再次手术的独立危险因素。ROC分析显示,PI-LL在截断值为12.95°时曲线下面积(AUC)为0.662(95%CI = 0.582-0.741),PT在截断值为21.98°时AUC为0.685(95%CI = 0.606-0.763),DH在截断值为8.22°时AUC为0.602(95%CI = 0.521-0.683)。

结论

PI-LL≥12.95°、PT≥21.98°和DH≥8.22°是PTED术后再次手术的独立危险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b841/11929410/2e67c78d3e70/JPR-18-1351-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b841/11929410/a3024776c5b5/JPR-18-1351-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b841/11929410/2e67c78d3e70/JPR-18-1351-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b841/11929410/a3024776c5b5/JPR-18-1351-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b841/11929410/2e67c78d3e70/JPR-18-1351-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Association Between Spinopelvic Alignment and Reoperation Following Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression: A Matched Case-Control Study.经皮椎间孔镜减压术后脊柱骨盆矢状位参数与再次手术的相关性:一项配对病例对照研究
J Pain Res. 2025 Mar 18;18:1351-1360. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S505372. eCollection 2025.
2
Influence of Spinopelvic Alignment on the Clinical Outcomes Following Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Stenosis.腰椎管狭窄减压手术后脊柱骨盆矢状位参数对临床疗效的影响
Cureus. 2023 Oct 1;15(10):e46302. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46302. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Does BMI Impact Spinopelvic Alignment after Lumbar Fusion Surgery?体重指数对腰椎融合术后脊柱骨盆矢状位参数有影响吗?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Apr 21. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005369.
4
Spinopelvic sagittal imbalance as a risk factor for adjacent-segment disease after single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion.脊柱骨盆矢状面失衡作为单节段腰椎后路椎间融合术后相邻节段疾病的危险因素。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Apr;26(4):435-440. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.SPINE16232. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
5
Impact of decompression surgery without fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis on sagittal spinopelvic alignment: minimum 2-year follow-up.非融合减压手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症对矢状位脊柱骨盆对线的影响:至少2年随访
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Feb 15;30(6):743-749. doi: 10.3171/2018.11.SPINE181092. Print 2019 Jun 1.
6
Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.术式是否有影响?单节段腰椎融合术中脊柱骨盆参数的比较影像学分析。
Spine J. 2018 Nov;18(11):1999-2008. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
7
[Relationship between alterations of spine-pelvic sagittal parameters and clinical outcomes after oblique lumbar interbody fusion].[斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术后脊柱-骨盆矢状面参数改变与临床疗效的关系]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2020 Jul 25;33(7):609-14. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2020.07.004.
8
How do spinopelvic parameters influence patient-reported outcome measurements after lumbar decompression?脊柱骨盆参数如何影响腰椎减压术后患者报告的结局测量?
Spine J. 2020 Oct;20(10):1610-1617. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.101. Epub 2020 May 20.
9
Estimation of the ideal correction of lumbar lordosis to prevent reoperation for symptomatic adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion in older people.评估老年人腰椎融合术后因症状性邻近节段疾病而再次手术的理想腰椎前凸矫正。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jul 3;21(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03463-3.
10
Mid-term changes in spinopelvic sagittal alignment in lumbar spinal stenosis with coexisting degenerative spondylolisthesis or scoliosis after minimally invasive lumbar decompression surgery: minimum five-year follow-up.微创腰椎减压术后伴退行性腰椎滑脱或脊柱侧弯的腰椎管狭窄症患者的脊柱矢状位平衡的中期变化:至少 5 年随访。
Spine J. 2022 May;22(5):819-826. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.11.012. Epub 2021 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Intraoperative changes of surgical approach and a second surgery after percutaneous endoscopic surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.经皮内镜腰椎管狭窄术后手术入路的术中变化和二次手术。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024 Sep 28;79:100498. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100498. eCollection 2024.
2
Mismatch Between Pelvic Incidence and Lumbar Lordosis After Personalized Interbody Fusion: The Importance of Preoperative Planning and Alignment in Degenerative Spine Diseases.个性化椎间融合术后骨盆入射角与腰椎前凸的不匹配:术前规划和对线在退行性脊柱疾病中的重要性。
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Aug 30;18(S1):S24-S31. doi: 10.14444/8638.
3
Preoperative Radiographic Predictors of Subsequent Fusion After Lumbar Decompression Surgery.
腰椎减压术后融合的术前影像学预测因素。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 Nov 15;49(22):1598-1606. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005109. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
4
Recompression after percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: risk factors and outcomes of two different reoperation procedures.经皮椎间孔镜下减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症后的再减压:两种不同再次手术方法的危险因素及疗效
Front Surg. 2024 Jun 24;11:1392215. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1392215. eCollection 2024.
5
Full endoscopic percutaneous stenoscopic lumbar decompression and discectomy: An outcome and efficacy analysis on 606 lumbar stenosis patients.全内镜下经皮狭窄镜腰椎减压与椎间盘切除术:606例腰椎管狭窄症患者的疗效分析
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2024 Apr-Jun;15(2):247-253. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_48_24. Epub 2024 May 24.
6
Association of spinal-pelvic parameters with recurrence of lumbar disc herniation after endoscopic surgery: a retrospective case-control study.内镜手术后腰椎间盘突出症复发与脊柱骨盆参数的相关性:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Feb;33(2):444-452. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08073-w. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
7
Correction of Spinal Sagittal Alignment after Posterior Lumbar Decompression: Does Severity of Central Canal Stenosis Matter?腰椎后路减压术后脊柱矢状面排列的矫正:中央管狭窄的严重程度有影响吗?
Asian Spine J. 2023 Dec;17(6):1089-1097. doi: 10.31616/asj.2023.0075. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
8
Role of the Paraspinal Muscles in the Sagittal Imbalance Cascade: The Effects of Their Endurance and of Their Morphology on Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment.脊柱旁肌肉在矢状面失衡级联反应中的作用:其耐力和形态对矢状面脊柱骨盆排列的影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Dec 20;105(24):1954-1961. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.01175. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
9
Clinical outcome of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression in treatment of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a matched retrospective study.经皮内窥镜腰椎减压术治疗老年腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效:一项匹配的回顾性研究。
Int Orthop. 2024 Jan;48(1):201-209. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05947-y. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
10
Long-Term Changes in Sagittal Balance After Microsurgical Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis in Elderly Patients: A Follow-Up Study for 5-Years After Surgery.老年腰椎管狭窄症患者显微减压术后矢状位平衡的长期变化:术后 5 年随访研究。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Aug;176:e384-e390. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.05.069. Epub 2023 May 24.