Freeman M L, Meredith M J
Vanderbilt Center for Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232.
Cancer Res. 1989 Aug 15;49(16):4493-8.
Chinese hamster ovary cells were exposed in vitro to various concentrations of diamide for 1 h at 37 degrees C. This treatment resulted in a dose dependent increase in cytotoxicity. Cells were also heated at 43 degrees C for 15 min, incubated at 37 degrees C for 3 h, and then exposed to various concentrations of diamide. This heat shock has been shown previously to trigger the synthesis of heat shock proteins and the development of thermotolerance. Further, under these experimental conditions both were inhibited if protein synthesis was inhibited by exposure to cycloheximide (M. L. Freeman et al., Radiat. Res., 112: 195-203, 1987). Diamide toxicity was diminished in cells made thermotolerant by the 43 degrees C/15-min heat shock. For example, at the highest dose used, 0.8 mM, survival increased from 0.93% to 6.1%. However, diamide toxicity was unaffected if the cells were exposed to diamide 3 h after a 43 degrees C/60 min heat shock. This latter heat shock produced significant inhibition of protein synthesis whereas the 15-min heat shock did not (M. L. Freeman et al., Cancer Res., 48: 7033-7037, 1988). Further, a 43 degrees C/15-min heat shock did not confer protection against diamide toxicity if the cells were simultaneously exposed to cycloheximide. Exposure to 0.8 mM diamide was shown to oxidize specific cellular proteins as measured by 2-dimensional thiol blotting. However, the degree of protein thiol modification was not affected by a prior heat shock. Nor did the heat shock increase the intracellular concentration of glutathione or the activity of glutathione reductase. The diamide treatment caused specific, as opposed to general, protein thiol oxidation and heat shock did not prevent this. It is hypothesized that it was the oxidation of protein thiols which led to cellular toxicity. Protein synthesis, triggered by heat shock, protected cells from the diamide toxicity without preventing protein thiol modification. These results suggest that the proteins synthesized after heat shock can provide protection against the consequences of aberrant proteins produced by thiol oxidation.
将中国仓鼠卵巢细胞在体外于37℃下暴露于不同浓度的二酰胺中1小时。这种处理导致细胞毒性呈剂量依赖性增加。细胞还在43℃下加热15分钟,在37℃下孵育3小时,然后暴露于不同浓度的二酰胺。先前已表明这种热休克会触发热休克蛋白的合成和耐热性的发展。此外,在这些实验条件下,如果通过暴露于环己酰亚胺抑制蛋白质合成,那么这两者都会受到抑制(M.L.弗里曼等人,《辐射研究》,112:195 - 203,1987)。43℃/15分钟热休克使细胞产生耐热性后,二酰胺毒性降低。例如,在使用的最高剂量0.8 mM时,存活率从0.93%提高到6.1%。然而,如果细胞在43℃/60分钟热休克3小时后暴露于二酰胺,二酰胺毒性不受影响。后一种热休克对蛋白质合成产生了显著抑制,而15分钟热休克则没有(M.L.弗里曼等人,《癌症研究》,48:7033 - 7037,1988)。此外,如果细胞同时暴露于环己酰亚胺,43℃/15分钟热休克不会赋予对二酰胺毒性的保护作用。通过二维硫醇印迹法测定,暴露于0.8 mM二酰胺会氧化特定的细胞蛋白质。然而,蛋白质硫醇修饰的程度不受先前热休克的影响。热休克也没有增加细胞内谷胱甘肽的浓度或谷胱甘肽还原酶的活性。二酰胺处理导致的是特异性而非一般性的蛋白质硫醇氧化,热休克并不能阻止这种情况。据推测,正是蛋白质硫醇的氧化导致了细胞毒性。热休克引发的蛋白质合成保护细胞免受二酰胺毒性,同时又不阻止蛋白质硫醇修饰。这些结果表明,热休克后合成的蛋白质可以提供保护,防止硫醇氧化产生的异常蛋白质带来的后果。