Lee Y J, Dewey W C
J Cell Physiol. 1987 Jul;132(1):1-11. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041320102.
During 4 hr after puromycin (PUR: 20 micrograms/ml) treatment, the synthesis of three major heat shock protein families (HSPs: Mr = 110,000, 87,000, and 70,000) was enhanced 1.5-fold relative to that of untreated cells, as studied by one-dimensional gel electrophoresis. The increase of unique HSPs, if studied with two-dimensional gels, would probably be much greater. In parallel, thermotolerance was observed at 10(-3) isosurvival as a thermotolerance ratio (TTR) of either 2 or greater than 5 after heating at either 45.5 degrees C or 43 degrees C, respectively. However, thermotolerance was induced by only intermediate concentrations (3-30 micrograms/ml) of puromycin that inhibited protein synthesis by 15-80%; a high concentration of PUR (100 micrograms/ml) that inhibited protein synthesis by 95% did not induce either HSPs or thermotolerance. Also, thermotolerance was never induced by any concentration (0.01-10 micrograms/ml) of cycloheximide that inhibited protein synthesis by 5-94%. Furthermore, after PUR (20 micrograms/ml) treatment, the addition of cycloheximide (CHM: 10 micrograms/ml), at a concentration that reduces protein synthesis by 94%, inhibited both thermotolerance and synthesis of HSP families. Thus, thermotolerance induced by intermediate concentrations of PUR correlated with an increase in newly synthesized HSP families. This thermotolerance phenomenon was compared with another phenomenon termed heat resistance and observed when cells were heated at 43 degrees C in the presence of CHM or PUR immediately after a 2-hr pretreatment with CHM or PUR. Heat protection increased with inhibition of synthesis of both total protein and HSP families. Moreover, this heat protection decayed rapidly as the interval between pretreatment and heating increased to 1-2 hr, and did not have any obvious relationship to the synthesis of HSP families. Therefore, there are two distinctly different pathways for developing thermal resistance. The first is thermotolerance after intermediate concentrations of PUR treatment, and it requires incubation after treatment and apparently the synthesis of HSP families. The second is resistance to heat after CHM or PUR treatment immediately before and during heating at 43 degrees C, and it apparently does not require synthesis of HSP families. This second pathway not requiring the synthesis of HSP families also was observed by the increase in thermotolerance at 45.5 degrees C caused by heating at 43 degrees C after cells were incubated for 2-4 hr following pretreatment with an intermediate concentration of PUR.
在用嘌呤霉素(PUR:20微克/毫升)处理后的4小时内,通过一维凝胶电泳研究发现,三个主要热休克蛋白家族(HSPs:分子量分别为110,000、87,000和70,000)的合成相对于未处理细胞增强了1.5倍。如果用二维凝胶研究独特HSPs的增加情况,可能会大得多。同时,在10⁻³等存活水平下观察到耐热性,即在分别于45.5℃或43℃加热后,耐热性比率(TTR)为2或大于5。然而,只有中间浓度(3 - 30微克/毫升)的嘌呤霉素能诱导耐热性,其抑制蛋白质合成15% - 80%;高浓度的PUR(100微克/毫升)抑制蛋白质合成95%,却不诱导HSPs或耐热性。同样,任何浓度(0.01 - 10微克/毫升)的环己酰亚胺抑制蛋白质合成5% - 94%,都从未诱导出耐热性。此外,在用PUR(20微克/毫升)处理后,添加环己酰亚胺(CHM:10微克/毫升),该浓度使蛋白质合成减少94%,会抑制耐热性和HSP家族的合成。因此,中间浓度的PUR诱导的耐热性与新合成的HSP家族增加相关。将这种耐热性现象与另一种称为热抗性的现象进行比较,当细胞在先用CHM或PUR进行2小时预处理后,立即在CHM或PUR存在下于43℃加热时观察到热抗性。热保护随着总蛋白质和HSP家族合成的抑制而增加。此外,随着预处理和加热之间的间隔增加到1 - 2小时,这种热保护迅速衰减,并且与HSP家族的合成没有明显关系。因此,产生热抗性有两条明显不同的途径。第一条是中间浓度的PUR处理后的耐热性,它需要处理后孵育,显然还需要HSP家族的合成。第二条是在43℃加热前及加热期间立即用CHM或PUR处理后的热抗性,显然它不需要HSP家族的合成。在用中间浓度的PUR预处理后孵育2 - 4小时,再于43℃加热,由此导致的45.5℃耐热性增加也观察到了这条不需要HSP家族合成的第二条途径。