Imamura Fumiaki, Micha Renata, Wu Jason H Y, de Oliveira Otto Marcia C, Otite Fadar O, Abioye Ajibola I, Mozaffarian Dariush
Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Tufts Friedman School of Nutrition Science & Policy, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS Med. 2016 Jul 19;13(7):e1002087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002087. eCollection 2016 Jul.
Effects of major dietary macronutrients on glucose-insulin homeostasis remain controversial and may vary by the clinical measures examined. We aimed to assess how saturated fat (SFA), monounsaturated fat (MUFA), polyunsaturated fat (PUFA), and carbohydrate affect key metrics of glucose-insulin homeostasis.
We systematically searched multiple databases (PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, BIOSIS, Web-of-Knowledge, CAB, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, SIGLE, Faculty1000) for randomised controlled feeding trials published by 26 Nov 2015 that tested effects of macronutrient intake on blood glucose, insulin, HbA1c, insulin sensitivity, and insulin secretion in adults aged ≥18 years. We excluded trials with non-isocaloric comparisons and trials providing dietary advice or supplements rather than meals. Studies were reviewed and data extracted independently in duplicate. Among 6,124 abstracts, 102 trials, including 239 diet arms and 4,220 adults, met eligibility requirements. Using multiple-treatment meta-regression, we estimated dose-response effects of isocaloric replacements between SFA, MUFA, PUFA, and carbohydrate, adjusted for protein, trans fat, and dietary fibre. Replacing 5% energy from carbohydrate with SFA had no significant effect on fasting glucose (+0.02 mmol/L, 95% CI = -0.01, +0.04; n trials = 99), but lowered fasting insulin (-1.1 pmol/L; -1.7, -0.5; n = 90). Replacing carbohydrate with MUFA lowered HbA1c (-0.09%; -0.12, -0.05; n = 23), 2 h post-challenge insulin (-20.3 pmol/L; -32.2, -8.4; n = 11), and homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (-2.4%; -4.6, -0.3; n = 30). Replacing carbohydrate with PUFA significantly lowered HbA1c (-0.11%; -0.17, -0.05) and fasting insulin (-1.6 pmol/L; -2.8, -0.4). Replacing SFA with PUFA significantly lowered glucose, HbA1c, C-peptide, and HOMA. Based on gold-standard acute insulin response in ten trials, PUFA significantly improved insulin secretion capacity (+0.5 pmol/L/min; 0.2, 0.8) whether replacing carbohydrate, SFA, or even MUFA. No significant effects of any macronutrient replacements were observed for 2 h post-challenge glucose or insulin sensitivity (minimal-model index). Limitations included a small number of trials for some outcomes and potential issues of blinding, compliance, generalisability, heterogeneity due to unmeasured factors, and publication bias.
This meta-analysis of randomised controlled feeding trials provides evidence that dietary macronutrients have diverse effects on glucose-insulin homeostasis. In comparison to carbohydrate, SFA, or MUFA, most consistent favourable effects were seen with PUFA, which was linked to improved glycaemia, insulin resistance, and insulin secretion capacity.
主要膳食宏量营养素对葡萄糖 - 胰岛素稳态的影响仍存在争议,且可能因所检测的临床指标而异。我们旨在评估饱和脂肪(SFA)、单不饱和脂肪(MUFA)、多不饱和脂肪(PUFA)和碳水化合物如何影响葡萄糖 - 胰岛素稳态的关键指标。
我们系统检索了多个数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、OVID、BIOSIS、Web-of-Knowledge、CAB、CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆、SIGLE、Faculty1000),以查找2015年11月26日前发表的随机对照喂养试验,这些试验测试了宏量营养素摄入量对≥18岁成年人的血糖、胰岛素、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、胰岛素敏感性和胰岛素分泌的影响。我们排除了非等热量比较的试验以及提供饮食建议或补充剂而非膳食的试验。研究由两人独立进行审查和数据提取。在6124篇摘要中,102项试验(包括239个饮食组和4220名成年人)符合纳入标准。使用多重治疗元回归,我们估计了在调整蛋白质、反式脂肪和膳食纤维后,SFA、MUFA、PUFA和碳水化合物之间等热量替代的剂量反应效应。用SFA替代5%能量的碳水化合物对空腹血糖无显著影响(+0.02 mmol/L,95%置信区间=-0.01,+0.04;试验数n = 99),但降低了空腹胰岛素水平(-1.1 pmol/L;-1.7,-0.5;n = 90)。用MUFA替代碳水化合物可降低糖化血红蛋白(-0.09%;-0.12,-0.05;n = 23)、餐后2小时胰岛素水平(-20.3 pmol/L;-32.2,-8.4;n = 11)以及胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)(-2.4%;-4.6,-0.3;n = 30)。用PUFA替代碳水化合物可显著降低糖化血红蛋白(-0.11%;-0.17,-0.05)和空腹胰岛素水平(-1.6 pmol/L;-2.8,-0.4)。用PUFA替代SFA可显著降低血糖、糖化血红蛋白、C肽和HOMA。基于十项试验中的金标准急性胰岛素反应,无论替代碳水化合物、SFA甚至MUFA,PUFA均显著改善胰岛素分泌能力(+0.5 pmol/L/分钟;0.2,0.8)。对于餐后2小时血糖或胰岛素敏感性(最小模型指数),未观察到任何宏量营养素替代的显著影响。局限性包括某些结局的试验数量较少,以及存在盲法、依从性、普遍性、未测量因素导致的异质性和发表偏倚等潜在问题。
这项对随机对照喂养试验的荟萃分析提供了证据,表明膳食宏量营养素对葡萄糖 - 胰岛素稳态具有多种影响。与碳水化合物、SFA或MUFA相比,PUFA的最一致有利影响最为明显,这与改善血糖、胰岛素抵抗和胰岛素分泌能力相关。