Suppr超能文献

德语人群中足部功能指数的年龄和性别相关标准数据。

Age- and Sex-Related Normative Data for the Foot Function Index in a German-Speaking Cohort.

作者信息

Schneider Wolfgang, Jurenitsch Stefan

机构信息

Orthopaedic Department, Herz Jesu-Hospital, Wien/Vienna, Austria

Orthopaedic Department, Herz Jesu-Hospital, Wien/Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Nov;37(11):1238-1242. doi: 10.1177/1071100716659747. Epub 2016 Jul 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing popularity of the Foot Function Index (FFI), normative values are still unavailable for this self-administered score. This study was designed to generate age- and sex-related normative values for the FFI-total and for both subscales FFI-pain and FFI-disability.

METHODS

We used the cross-cultural adapted and validated German version of the FFI to generate a data pool using the results of 625 individuals, including staff and visitors to our hospital and excluding persons scheduled for foot surgery or in after-treatment.

RESULTS

Mean values for FFI-total were calculated: 15.3 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.3-16.9), 14.9 points for FFI-pain (CI, 13.3-16.5), and 15.6 for FFI-disability (CI, 13.8-17.4). Results showed higher values for FFI-total, FFI-pain, and FFI-disability for individuals older than 40 years. In general, normative values showed a tendency for higher values with age. A slightly inconsistent distribution over different age groups with a peak for individuals in their 40s and 50s was observed, especially for FFI-pain. Men had better scores than women. Individuals with previous surgery showed lower scores in their respective score.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data calculated normative values for a German-speaking cohort for FFI-total as well as for both subscales FFI-pain and FFI-disability. Our data quantified the increase of FFI-total, FFI-pain, and FFI-disability normative values with age but also showed a slightly inconsistent distribution of normative values over all age groups. We demonstrated higher normative values for women and slightly higher normative values for individuals with previous foot or ankle surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, prospective comparative study.

摘要

背景

尽管足部功能指数(FFI)越来越受欢迎,但该自评分数的标准值仍然不可用。本研究旨在生成与年龄和性别相关的FFI总分以及FFI疼痛和FFI残疾两个子量表的标准值。

方法

我们使用经过跨文化改编和验证的德语版FFI,通过625名个体的结果生成一个数据库,这些个体包括我院的工作人员和访客,不包括计划进行足部手术或术后治疗的人员。

结果

计算出FFI总分的平均值:15.3分(95%置信区间[CI],13.3 - 16.9),FFI疼痛为14.9分(CI,13.3 - 16.5),FFI残疾为15.6分(CI,13.8 - 17.4)。结果显示,40岁以上个体的FFI总分、FFI疼痛和FFI残疾值更高。一般来说,标准值呈现随年龄增长而升高的趋势。观察到不同年龄组的分布略有不一致,40多岁和50多岁的个体出现峰值,尤其是FFI疼痛。男性得分高于女性。曾接受手术的个体在各自的分数上得分较低。

结论

我们的数据计算出了德语队列中FFI总分以及FFI疼痛和FFI残疾两个子量表的标准值。我们的数据量化了FFI总分、FFI疼痛和FFI残疾标准值随年龄的增加,但也显示了所有年龄组标准值的分布略有不一致。我们证明了女性的标准值更高,以及曾接受足部或踝关节手术的个体的标准值略高。

证据水平

II,前瞻性比较研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验