Sandford Stella
Department of Philosophy, Centre for Research in Modern European Philosophy, Kingston University, Penrhyn Road, Kingston upon Thames, KT1 2EE, UK.
Int J Psychoanal. 2017 Feb;98(1):91-110. doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12564. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
This interdisciplinary article takes a philosophical approach to The Interpretation of Dreams, connecting Freud to one of the few philosophers with whom he sometimes identified - Immanuel Kant. It aims to show that Freud's theory of dreams has more in common with Bion's later thoughts on dreaming than is usually recognized. Distinguishing, via a discussion of Kant, between the conflicting 'epistemological' and 'anthropological' aspects of The Interpretation of Dreams, it shows that one specific contradiction in the book - concerning the relation between dream-work and waking thought - can be understood in terms of the tension between these conflicting aspects. Freud reaches the explicit conclusion that the dream-work and waking thought differ from each other absolutely; but the implicit conclusion of The Interpretation of Dreams is quite the opposite. This article argues that the explicit conclusion is the result of the epistemological aspects of the book; the implicit conclusion, which brings Freud much closer to Bion, the result of the anthropological approach. Bringing philosophy and psychoanalysis together this paper thus argues for an interpretation of The Interpretation of Dreams that is in some ways at odds with the standard view of the book, while also suggesting that aspects of Kant's 'anthropological' works might legitimately be seen as a precursor of psychoanalysis.
这篇跨学科文章采用哲学方法解读《梦的解析》,将弗洛伊德与他有时认同的少数几位哲学家之一——伊曼努尔·康德联系起来。其目的是表明,弗洛伊德的梦的理论与比昂后来关于做梦的思想的共同点比通常认为的更多。通过对康德的讨论,区分了《梦的解析》中相互冲突的“认识论”和“人类学”方面,表明书中一个特定的矛盾——关于梦的工作与清醒思维之间的关系——可以从这些相互冲突的方面之间的张力来理解。弗洛伊德得出明确的结论,即梦的工作和清醒思维绝对彼此不同;但《梦的解析》的隐含结论却恰恰相反。本文认为,明确的结论是该书认识论方面的结果;而隐含结论使弗洛伊德更接近比昂,是人类学方法的结果。因此,本文将哲学与精神分析结合起来,主张对《梦的解析》进行一种在某些方面与该书标准观点相悖的解读,同时也表明康德“人类学”著作的某些方面可以合理地被视为精神分析的先驱。