• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性应激选择性损害行为学习。

Acute stress selectively impairs learning to act.

机构信息

Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London, WC1N 3BG UK.

Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, WC1N 3BG UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 20;6:29816. doi: 10.1038/srep29816.

DOI:10.1038/srep29816
PMID:27436299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4951701/
Abstract

Stress interferes with instrumental learning. However, choice is also influenced by non-instrumental factors, most strikingly by biases arising from Pavlovian associations that facilitate action in pursuit of rewards and inaction in the face of punishment. Whether stress impacts on instrumental learning via these Pavlovian associations is unknown. Here, in a task where valence (reward or punishment) and action (go or no-go) were orthogonalised, we asked whether the impact of stress on learning was action or valence specific. We exposed 60 human participants either to stress (socially-evaluated cold pressor test) or a control condition (room temperature water). We contrasted two hypotheses: that stress would lead to a non-selective increase in the expression of Pavlovian biases; or that stress, as an aversive state, might specifically impact action production due to the Pavlovian linkage between inaction and aversive states. We found support for the second of these hypotheses. Stress specifically impaired learning to produce an action, irrespective of the valence of the outcome, an effect consistent with a Pavlovian linkage between punishment and inaction. This deficit in action-learning was also reflected in pupillary responses; stressed individuals showed attenuated pupillary responses to action, hinting at a noradrenergic contribution to impaired action-learning under stress.

摘要

压力会干扰工具性学习。然而,选择也会受到非工具性因素的影响,最明显的是由巴甫洛夫联想引起的偏差,这些偏差促进了为追求奖励而采取行动,以及面对惩罚而不采取行动。压力是否通过这些巴甫洛夫联想影响工具性学习尚不清楚。在这里,在一个奖惩和行动(去或不去)正交的任务中,我们想知道压力对学习的影响是针对行动还是针对奖惩。我们让 60 名人类参与者暴露于压力(社会评价冷加压测试)或对照条件(室温水)下。我们对比了两种假设:压力会导致巴甫洛夫偏见表达的非选择性增加;或者压力作为一种厌恶状态,可能会由于不动和厌恶状态之间的巴甫洛夫联系,特别影响行动的产生。我们支持了后一种假设。压力特异性地损害了产生行动的学习,而与结果的奖惩无关,这一效应与惩罚和不动之间的巴甫洛夫联系一致。这种行动学习的缺陷也反映在瞳孔反应中;压力组的个体对行动的瞳孔反应减弱,暗示去甲肾上腺素能系统在压力下的行动学习受损中起作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd7/4951701/444d1080577f/srep29816-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd7/4951701/38e0186d8035/srep29816-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd7/4951701/f44fb844cdb1/srep29816-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd7/4951701/7b60bcedacef/srep29816-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd7/4951701/e2e886e8592a/srep29816-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd7/4951701/444d1080577f/srep29816-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd7/4951701/38e0186d8035/srep29816-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd7/4951701/f44fb844cdb1/srep29816-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd7/4951701/7b60bcedacef/srep29816-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd7/4951701/e2e886e8592a/srep29816-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bd7/4951701/444d1080577f/srep29816-f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Acute stress selectively impairs learning to act.急性应激选择性损害行为学习。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 20;6:29816. doi: 10.1038/srep29816.
2
Easy to learn, hard to suppress: The impact of learned stimulus-outcome associations on subsequent action control.易学难抑:习得的刺激-结果关联对后续动作控制的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2015 Dec;101:17-34. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Nov 8.
3
Pupil dilation reflects effortful action invigoration in overcoming aversive Pavlovian biases.瞳孔扩张反映了在克服厌恶的巴甫洛夫偏见时费力行动的激发。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Aug;24(4):720-739. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01191-y. Epub 2024 May 21.
4
Learning in anticipation of reward and punishment: perspectives across the human lifespan.期待奖惩的学习:人类生命周期的观点。
Neurobiol Aging. 2020 Dec;96:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.08.011. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
5
Adolescents exhibit reduced Pavlovian biases on instrumental learning.青少年在工具性学习上表现出较少的巴甫洛夫式偏见。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 25;10(1):15770. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72628-w.
6
The Role of the Striatum in Learning to Orthogonalize Action and Valence: A Combined PET and 7 T MRI Aging Study.纹状体在学习使动作和效价正交化中的作用:一项结合 PET 和 7T MRI 的老龄化研究。
Cereb Cortex. 2020 May 14;30(5):3340-3351. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz313.
7
Dopamine Selectively Modulates the Outcome of Learning Unnatural Action-Valence Associations.多巴胺选择性调节非自然动作-效价关联学习的结果。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 May;29(5):816-826. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01099. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
8
Catecholaminergic challenge uncovers distinct Pavlovian and instrumental mechanisms of motivated (in)action.儿茶酚胺能激发揭示了动机性(不)行动中不同的巴甫洛夫式和工具性机制。
Elife. 2017 May 15;6:e22169. doi: 10.7554/eLife.22169.
9
Neural signatures of arbitration between Pavlovian and instrumental action selection.巴甫洛夫式与工具性动作选择之间仲裁的神经特征。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Feb 10;17(2):e1008553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008553. eCollection 2021 Feb.
10
Controllability governs the balance between Pavlovian and instrumental action selection.可控性支配着巴甫洛夫式和工具性动作选择之间的平衡。
Nat Commun. 2019 Dec 20;10(1):5826. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13737-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Childhood unpredictability and the development of exploration.儿童期的不可预测性与探索行为的发展。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Dec 5;120(49):e2303869120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2303869120. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
2
Anxiety associated with perceived uncontrollable stress enhances expectations of environmental volatility and impairs reward learning.与感知到的不可控压力相关的焦虑会增强对环境波动性的预期,并损害奖励学习。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 27;13(1):18451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45179-z.
3
Comparison between the Effects of Acute Physical and Psychosocial Stress on Feedback-Based Learning.

本文引用的文献

1
Computations of uncertainty mediate acute stress responses in humans.不确定性的计算介导人类的急性应激反应。
Nat Commun. 2016 Mar 29;7:10996. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10996.
2
Stress associated changes in Pavlovian-instrumental transfer in humans.压力相关的人类巴甫洛夫式工具性转移变化。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Apr;70(4):675-685. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1149198. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
3
Relationships between Pupil Diameter and Neuronal Activity in the Locus Coeruleus, Colliculi, and Cingulate Cortex.瞳孔直径与蓝斑、丘系和扣带回皮质中神经元活动之间的关系。
急性身体应激与心理社会应激对基于反馈的学习影响的比较
Brain Sci. 2023 Jul 26;13(8):1127. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13081127.
4
Learning in a crisis moment: a randomized controlled trial in emergency bystander intervention.危机时刻的学习:急诊旁观者干预的随机对照试验。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Jul 21;11(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01146-x.
5
Stress to inflammation and anhedonia: Mechanistic insights from preclinical and clinical models.压力与炎症及快感缺失:来自临床前和临床模型的机制见解。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Sep;152:105307. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105307. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
6
Modeling Variation in Empathic Sensitivity Using Go/No-Go Social Reinforcement Learning.使用“是/否”社会强化学习对共情敏感性的个体差异进行建模。
Affect Sci. 2022 May 31;3(3):603-615. doi: 10.1007/s42761-022-00119-4. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Acute stress blunts prediction error signals in the dorsal striatum during reinforcement learning.急性应激会在强化学习过程中减弱背侧纹状体中的预测误差信号。
Neurobiol Stress. 2021 Oct 27;15:100412. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2021.100412. eCollection 2021 Nov.
8
Motivational learning biases are differentially modulated by genetic determinants of striatal and prefrontal dopamine function.动机学习偏向受纹状体和前额叶多巴胺功能遗传决定因素的差异调节。
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2021 Nov;128(11):1705-1720. doi: 10.1007/s00702-021-02382-4. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
9
Search for solutions, learning, simulation, and choice processes in suicidal behavior.寻找自杀行为中的解决办法、学习、模拟和选择过程。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2022 Jan;13(1):e1561. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1561. Epub 2021 May 18.
10
An Integrative Framework of Appraisal and Adaptation in Serious Medical Illness.重症疾病评估与适应的综合框架
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Sep;60(3):657-677.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.05.018. Epub 2020 May 21.
Neuron. 2016 Jan 6;89(1):221-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.028. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
4
CRH Engagement of the Locus Coeruleus Noradrenergic System Mediates Stress-Induced Anxiety.促肾上腺皮质激素释放激素与蓝斑去甲肾上腺素能系统的相互作用介导应激诱导的焦虑。
Neuron. 2015 Aug 5;87(3):605-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
5
Noradrenaline and dopamine neurons in the reward/effort trade-off: a direct electrophysiological comparison in behaving monkeys.奖赏/努力权衡中的去甲肾上腺素能和多巴胺能神经元:行为学猕猴的直接电生理比较
J Neurosci. 2015 May 20;35(20):7866-77. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0454-15.2015.
6
Anxious individuals have difficulty learning the causal statistics of aversive environments.焦虑的个体在学习厌恶环境的因果统计方面存在困难。
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Apr;18(4):590-6. doi: 10.1038/nn.3961. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
7
A computational and neural model of momentary subjective well-being.瞬间主观幸福感的计算和神经模型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Aug 19;111(33):12252-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407535111. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
8
Action versus valence in decision making.决策中的行动与效价
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;18(4):194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
9
Pupil diameter covaries with BOLD activity in human locus coeruleus.瞳孔直径与人类蓝斑中的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)活动共同变化。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Aug;35(8):4140-54. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22466. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
10
Decision-related pupil dilation reflects upcoming choice and individual bias.决策相关瞳孔扩张反映了即将到来的选择和个体偏好。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Feb 4;111(5):E618-25. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317557111. Epub 2014 Jan 21.