• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会交换的逻辑:自然选择塑造了人类的推理方式吗?关于沃森选择任务的研究。

The logic of social exchange: has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task.

作者信息

Cosmides L

出版信息

Cognition. 1989 Apr;31(3):187-276. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(89)90023-1.

DOI:10.1016/0010-0277(89)90023-1
PMID:2743748
Abstract

In order to successfully engage in social exchange--cooperation between two or more individuals for mutual benefit--humans must be able to solve a number of complex computational problems, and do so with special efficiency. Following Marr (1982), Cosmides (1985) and Cosmides and Tooby (1989) used evolutionary principles to develop a computational theory of these adaptive problems. Specific hypotheses concerning the structure of the algorithms that govern how humans reason about social exchange were derived from this computational theory. This article presents a series of experiments designed to test these hypotheses, using the Wason selection task, a test of logical reasoning. Part I reports experiments testing social exchange theory against the availability theories of reasoning; Part II reports experiments testing it against Cheng and Holyoak's (1985) permission schema theory. The experimental design included eight critical tests designed to choose between social exchange theory and these other two families of theories; the results of all eight tests support social exchange theory. The hypothesis that the human mind includes cognitive processes specialized for reasoning about social exchange predicts the content effects found in these experiments, and parsimoniously explains those that have already been reported in the literature. The implications of this line of research for a modular view of human reasoning are discussed, as well as the utility of evolutionary biology in the development of computational theories.

摘要

为了成功地进行社会交换——两个或更多个体为了互利而展开合作——人类必须能够解决一些复杂的计算问题,而且要以特殊的效率来解决。继马尔(1982)之后,科斯米德斯(1985)以及科斯米德斯和图比(1989)运用进化原理来发展关于这些适应性问题的计算理论。关于支配人类如何对社会交换进行推理的算法结构的具体假设就是从这个计算理论推导出来的。本文呈现了一系列旨在检验这些假设的实验,采用了逻辑推理测试——沃森选择任务。第一部分报告了针对推理的可得性理论来检验社会交换理论的实验;第二部分报告了针对程和霍利约克(1985)的许可图式理论来检验社会交换理论的实验。实验设计包括八项关键测试,旨在在社会交换理论与其他这两类理论之间做出选择;所有八项测试的结果都支持社会交换理论。人类思维包含专门用于对社会交换进行推理的认知过程这一假设预测了这些实验中发现的内容效应,并且简洁地解释了文献中已经报道过的那些效应。本文讨论了这一系列研究对于人类推理的模块观的意义,以及进化生物学在计算理论发展中的作用。

相似文献

1
The logic of social exchange: has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task.社会交换的逻辑:自然选择塑造了人类的推理方式吗?关于沃森选择任务的研究。
Cognition. 1989 Apr;31(3):187-276. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(89)90023-1.
2
Domain-specific reasoning: social contracts, cheating, and perspective change.特定领域推理:社会契约、欺骗与视角转换。
Cognition. 1992 May;43(2):127-71. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90060-u.
3
No interpretation without representation: the role of domain-specific representations and inferences in the Wason selection task.没有表征就没有解释:特定领域表征与推理在沃森选择任务中的作用。
Cognition. 2000 Oct 16;77(1):1-79. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00085-8.
4
Theory of mind broad and narrow: reasoning about social exchange engages ToM areas, precautionary reasoning does not.心理理论的广义与狭义:关于社会交换的推理涉及心理理论区域,预防性推理则不然。
Soc Neurosci. 2006;1(3-4):196-219. doi: 10.1080/17470910600989771.
5
Use or misuse of the selection task? Rejoinder to Fiddick, Cosmides, and Tooby.选择任务的使用还是误用?对菲迪克、科斯米德斯和图比的回应。
Cognition. 2002 Oct;85(3):277-90. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00125-7.
6
The origin of conditional logic: does a cheater detection module exist?条件逻辑的起源:是否存在一个欺骗者检测模块?
J Genet Psychol. 2002 Dec;163(4):425-44. doi: 10.1080/00221320209598694.
7
Dissecting the computational architecture of social inference mechanisms.剖析社会推理机制的计算架构。
Ciba Found Symp. 1997;208:132-56; discussion 156-61. doi: 10.1002/9780470515372.ch8.
8
[Social exchange and inference: an experimental study with the Wason selection task].[社会交换与推理:运用沃森选择任务的一项实验研究]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2001 Apr;72(1):29-35. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.72.29.
9
Darwinian algorithms and the Wason selection task: a factorial analysis of social contract selection task problems.达尔文算法与沃森选择任务:社会契约选择任务问题的析因分析
Cognition. 1993 Aug;48(2):163-92. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90029-u.
10
Perspective effects in nondeontic versions of the Wason selection task.沃森选择任务非道义版本中的视角效应。
Mem Cognit. 2000 Apr;28(3):396-405. doi: 10.3758/bf03198555.

引用本文的文献

1
Contractualist Moral Cognition: From the Normative to the Descriptive at Three Levels of Analysis.契约主义道德认知:从规范层面到描述层面的三个分析层次
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2025 Jul-Aug;16(4):e70011. doi: 10.1002/wcs.70011.
2
Jealousy as Predicted by Allocation and Reception of Resources in an Economic Game.经济游戏中资源分配和接收所预测的嫉妒。
Evol Psychol. 2024 Oct-Dec;22(4):14747049241289232. doi: 10.1177/14747049241289232.
3
Exploring the relationships between dominance behavioral system, mentalization, theory of mind and assertiveness: analysis in a non-clinical sample.
探索支配行为系统、心理化、心理理论与自信之间的关系:非临床样本分析
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 15;15:1407933. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1407933. eCollection 2024.
4
Language models, like humans, show content effects on reasoning tasks.语言模型和人类一样,在推理任务中表现出内容效应。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jul 16;3(7):pgae233. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae233. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
A Continuity in Logical Development: Domain-General Disjunctive Inference by Toddlers.逻辑发展的连续性:幼儿的领域通用析取推理
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Jun 28;8:809-825. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00148. eCollection 2024.
6
Deciding Who Is Worthy of Help: Effect of the Probability of Reciprocity on Individuals' Willingness to Help Others.决定谁值得帮助:互惠概率对个体帮助他人意愿的影响。
Evol Psychol. 2024 Apr-Jun;22(2):14747049241254725. doi: 10.1177/14747049241254725.
7
Better-than-chance prediction of cooperative behaviour from first and second impressions.基于第一印象和第二印象对合作行为进行超机遇水平的预测。
Evol Hum Sci. 2024 Jan 8;6:e2. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2023.30. eCollection 2024.
8
Evolution, the Cognitive Sciences, and the Science of Victimization.进化、认知科学与受害学研究
Evol Psychol. 2024 Jan-Mar;22(1):14747049231225146. doi: 10.1177/14747049231225146.
9
Deontic signs increase control monitoring: evidence from a modified traffic flanker task.道义符号增加控制监测:来自改良版交通信号干扰任务的证据。
Cogn Process. 2023 Aug;24(3):327-338. doi: 10.1007/s10339-023-01139-z. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
10
Social Safety Theory: Conceptual foundation, underlying mechanisms, and future directions.社会安全理论:概念基础、潜在机制和未来方向。
Health Psychol Rev. 2023 Mar;17(1):5-59. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2023.2171900. Epub 2023 Mar 30.