Blass Rachel B
13 Gikhon St., Jerusalem, Israel.
Int J Psychoanal. 2016 Jun;97(3):591-613. doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12547.
Through a re-examination of Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality (1905), this paper reveals a fundamental tension in Freud's thinking on the nature of the individual and of his sexuality. In this text Freud portrays the individual and sexuality as inherently object-related and at the same time as inherently independent of such relatedness. The way in which Freud presents these contradictory ideas suggests that he was not merely undecided on object-relatedness and sexuality but rather that the contradiction was integral to this thinking. The paper offers an explanation of the meaning of this contradiction, of why it has been neglected in the analytic literature, and of some implications for contemporary psychoanalysis and its approach to sexuality.
通过对《性学三论》（1905年）的重新审视，本文揭示了弗洛伊德关于个体本质及其性取向思想中的一个基本矛盾。在这篇文章中，弗洛伊德将个体和性取向描绘为本质上与对象相关，同时又本质上独立于这种相关性。弗洛伊德呈现这些矛盾观点的方式表明，他并非仅仅在与对象相关性和性取向问题上犹豫不决，而是这种矛盾是其思想不可或缺的一部分。本文对这一矛盾的意义、为何在精神分析文献中被忽视以及对当代精神分析及其性取向研究方法的一些影响进行了解释。
