Joyce Angela
British Psychoanalytical Society, 25 Drylands Rd, London, N89HN.
Int J Psychoanal. 2016 Jun;97(3):915-31. doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12523.
This essay explores the place of infantile sexuality in the theories of Anna Freud and Donald W Winnicott. Both Anna Freud and D.W. Winnicott incorporated and at the same time changed the classical psychoanalytic account of infantile sexuality and the instinctual drives. Whilst Anna Freud remained closer to her father's original conceptualization, she developed a multidimensional model of development which gave the drives a foundational status whist also maintaining their significance in giving meaning and texture to children's subjective experience. Winnicott also retained much of S. Freud's original theorizing except that in a fundamental way he turned it on its head when considering earliest development. For him the establishment of the self was paramount, and the drives and infantile sexuality merely served to give substance to that self.
本文探讨了婴儿期性在安娜·弗洛伊德和唐纳德·W·温尼科特理论中的地位。安娜·弗洛伊德和D.W. 温尼科特都吸收了经典精神分析对婴儿期性和本能驱力的解释，同时又对其进行了改变。虽然安娜·弗洛伊德更接近她父亲的原始概念，但她发展出了一个多维发展模型，该模型赋予驱力以基础地位，同时也保持了它们在赋予儿童主观体验意义和质感方面的重要性。温尼科特也保留了许多弗洛伊德的原始理论，只是在考虑早期发展时，他从根本上对其进行了颠倒。对他来说，自我的建立是至关重要的，而驱力和婴儿期性仅仅是为那个自我赋予实质内容。
